Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:30:33.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reduction in Abdominal Hysterectomy Surgical Site Infection Rates After the Addition of Anaerobic Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2020

Kyle Jenn
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics
Noelle Bowdler
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Stephanie Holley
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics
Mary Kukla
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Healthcare
Oluchi Abosi
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics
Angie Dains
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics
Holly Meacham
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics
Daniel Diekema
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine
Michael Edmond
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Jorge Salinas
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background: Antimicrobial prophylaxis is one of the strongest surgical site infection (SSI) prevention measures. Current guidelines recommend the use of cefazolin as antimicrobial prophylaxis for abdominal hysterectomy procedures. However, there is growing evidence that anaerobes play a role in abdominal hysterectomy SSIs. We assessed the impact of adding anaerobic coverage on abdominal hysterectomy SSI rates in our institution. Methods: The University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics is an 811-bed academic medical center that serves as a referral center for Iowa and neighboring states. Each year, ~33,000 major surgical operations are performed here, and on average, 600 are abdominal hysterectomies. Historically, patients have received cefazolin only, but beginning November 2017, patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy received cefazolin + metronidazole for antimicrobial prophylaxis. Order sets within the electronic medical record were modified, and education was provided to surgeons, anesthesiologists, and other ordering providers. Procedures and subsequent SSIs were monitored and reported using National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definitions. Infection rates are calculated using all depths (superficial, deep and organ space) and by deep and organ space only, as this is how they are publicly reported. We used numerator (SSIs) and denominator (number of abdominal hysterectomy procedures) data from the NHSN from January 2015 through September 2019. We performed an interrupted time-series analysis to determine how the addition of metronidazole was associated with abdominal hysterectomy SSIs (all depths, and deep and organ space). Results: From January 2015 through October 2017, the hysterectomy SSI rates were 3.2% (all depths) and 1.5% (deep and organ space). After the adjustment was made to antimicrobial prophylaxis in November 2017, the rates decreased to 1.6% (all depths) and 0.6% (deep and organ space). Of the SSIs with pathogens identified, the proportion of anaerobes decreased from 59% to 25% among all depths and from 82% to 50% among deep and organ-space SSIs. The rate of SSI decline after the intervention was statistically significant (P = .01) for deep and organ-space infections but not for all depths (P = .73). Conclusions: The addition of anaerobic coverage with metronidazole was associated with a decrease in deep and organ-space abdominal hysterectomy SSI rates at our institution. Hospitals should assess the microbiology of abdominal hysterectomy SSIs and should consider adding metronidazole to their antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Type
Oral Presentations
Copyright
© 2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.