Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:52:59.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surveillance of Hospital-Acquired Infection in England, Germany, and The Netherlands Will International Comparison of Rates Be Possible?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Rosa Coello ,
Petra Gastmeier  and
Annette S. de Boer
Rosa Coello*
Affiliation:
Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Unit, PHLS Central Public Health Laboratory, London, UK
Petra Gastmeier
Affiliation:
Institut für Hygiene, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany
Annette S. de Boer
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases Epidemiology, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, and the Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Utrecht, The Netherlands
*
Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Unit, PHLS Central Public Health Laboratory, 61 Colindale Ave, London, NW9 5HT, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three national surveillance systems for nosocomial infection have been developed independently and implemented successfully in England, Germany, and The Netherlands. All three are based on the American National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System and have adopted a surveillance strategy that is targeted at specific infections or groups of patients for limited time periods. Case-finding methods, the minimum data set, and analysis of data are similar and could be standardized easily. Resolution of the differences in the definitions of infection, the study population, and follow-up should make possible the international comparison of infection rates. Such comparisons may identify differences in healthcare practices between countries and suggest areas for improvement.

Type
Reader's Forum
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 22 , Issue 6 , June 2001 , pp. 393 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Mertens, R, Jans, B, Kurz, X. A computerized nationwide network for nosocomial infection surveillance in Belgium. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Mertens, R, Van den Berg, JM, Veerman-Brenzikofer, MLV, Kurz, X, Jans, B, Klazinga, N. International comparison of results of infection surveillance: The Netherlands versus Belgium. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:574–580.Google Scholar
3.Widmer, AF, Sax, H, Pittet, D. Infection control and hospital epidemiology outside the United States. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:17–21.Google Scholar
4.Emori, TG, Culver, DH, Horan, TC, Jarvis, WR, White, JW, Olson, DR, et al. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (NNIS): description of surveillance methods. Am J Infect Control 1999;19:19–35.Google Scholar
5.National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NNIS Manual. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Heath Service, CDC;1994.Google Scholar
6.Gaynes, RP, Horan, TC. Surveillance of nosocomial infections. In: Mayhall, CG, ed. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1996:1017–1054.Google Scholar
7.Gaynes, RP. Surveillance of surgical-site infections: the world coming together? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:309–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Cooke, EM, Coello, R, Sedgwick, J, Ward, V, Wilson, J, Charlett, A, et al. A national surveillance scheme for hospital-associated infections in England. J Hosp Infect 2000;46:1–3.Google Scholar
9.Gastmeier, P, Sohr, D, Just, H-M, Nassauer, A, Daschner, F, Rüden, H. How to survey nosocomial infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:366–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Geubbels, ELPE, Mintjes-de Groot, AJ, Berg van den, JMJ, de Boer, AS. An operating surveillance system of surgical-site infections in The Netherlands: results of the PREZIES national surveillance network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:311–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Glynn, A, Ward, V, Wilson, J, Charlett, A, Cookson, B, Taylor, L, et al. Hospital-Acquired Infection. Surveillance Policies and Practice. London, UK: Public Health Laboratory Service; 1997.Google Scholar
12.de Boer, AS, Mintjes-de Groot, AJ, Severijnen, AJ, van den Berg, JMJ, van Pelt, W. Risk assessment for surgical-site infections in orthopedic patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:402–407.Google Scholar
13.Garner, JS, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:28–140.Google Scholar
14.Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, Martone, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:606–608.Google Scholar
15.Gastmeier, P, Hentschel, J, de Veer, I, Obladen, M, Rüden, H. Device-associated nosocomial infection surveillance in neonatal intensive care using specific criteria for neonates. J Hosp Infect 1998;38:51–60.Google Scholar
16.Culver, DH, Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, Martone, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index: National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 1991;91(suppl 3B):152S–157S.Google Scholar
17.Wilson, J, Ward, V, Coello, R, Charlett, A, Sedgwick, J, Pearson, A. Surveillance of surgical site infection in England: the value of a national scheme. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:148. Abstract.Google Scholar
18.Gaynes, RP. Surgical-site infections and the NNIS SSI risk index: room for improvement. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:184–185.Google Scholar
19.Jarvis, WR, Edwards, JR, Culver, DH, Hughes, JM, Horan, T, Emori, TG, et al. Nosocomial infection rates in adult and pediatric intensive care units in the United States: National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 1991;91(suppl 3B):185S–191S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System, Centers for Disease Control. Nosocomial infection rates for interhospital comparison: limitations and possible solutions. A Report from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:609–621.Google Scholar
21.Coello, R, Charlett, A, Sedgwick, J, Ward, V, Wilson, J, Pearson, A. Hospital-acquired bacteraemia in England: where to focus preventative measures. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:94. Abstract.Google Scholar
22.Archibald, LK, Gaynes, RP. Hospital-acquired infections in the United States: the importance of interhospital comparisons. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1997;11:245–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Vincent, JL, Bihani, DJ, Suter, PM, Bruining, HA, White, J, Nicolas-Chanoin, MH, et al. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe: results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. JAMA 1995;274:639–644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed