Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:08:05.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tuberculin (TB) Skin Testing After Exposure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

William M. Valenti*
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
*
University of Rochester Medical Center 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14642

Extract

Many employee health programs perform skin-tests on employees after exposure to pulmonary tuberculosis. This activity has become standard in employee health programs. The scenario in most health care facilities involves employees who are exposed to patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis. Many of these patients have active disease that is not detected during their hospitalization, and personnel are exposed unknowingly. The diagnosis of tuberculosis is often made after the patient is discharged which may result in contact tracing of exposed employees. This activity seems straightforward at first glance but is usually time-consuming and cumbersome. The first questions often asked are: what constitutes a dangerous patient and what is the definition of an exposure?

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Williams, WW: CDC guideline for infection control in hospital personnel. Infect Control 1983; 4(suppl):326349.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Valenti, WM: Infection control and employee health: Prevention and Control of Tuberculosis. Infect Control 1985; 6:169170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.American Thoracic Society: Control of Tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983; 126:336342.Google Scholar
4.Lordi, GM, Reichman, LB: Tuberculosis: When not to order roentgenograms. JAMA 1985; 253:17801781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar