Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T19:56:20.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analyses of Vector Magnetograms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Jingxiu Wang
Jingxiu Wang*
Affiliation:
Beijing Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

(1) Current techniques may now permit an acceptable resolution of the 180 degree ambiguity in determining the direction of transverse fields. (2) The non-potentiality of active regions can be described by parameters of angular shear, source field, line-of-sight current, force-free factor and force-free current. A 2-dimensional description of angular shear is necessary, and an alternative, FFT method of calculating the line-of-sight current seems recommendable. (3) For a sampling region, the degree of non-potentiality quantified by all the parameters shows great enhancement right before a 1M flare, and reduces somehow during the flare. (4) A highly intermittent distribution of force-free factor with fully mixed signs is obtained, consistent with a theoretical approach.

Type
Session 7. Magnetic Shear and Electric Currents
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 141: The Magnetic and Velocity Fields of Solar Active Regions , 1993 , pp. 425 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 1993

References

Ai, G. and Kong, F. 1982, Acta Astronomica Sinica, 23, 211.Google Scholar
Ai, G. and Hu, Y. 1986, Publ. Beijing Astron. Obs, 8, 1.Google Scholar
Ai, G., Zhang, H., Li, W., Li, J., and Chen, J. 1990, in Solar-Terrestrial Prediction, Proceedings of a Workshop at Leura, Australian, p.264.Google Scholar
Aly, J.I. 1989, Sol. Phys., 120, 19.Google Scholar
de La Beaujardiere, J-F., Canfield, R.C., and Leka, K.D. 1992, submitted to Ap.J. Google Scholar
Cacciani, A., Varsik, J., and Zirin, H. 1989, Sol. Phys., 125, 173.Google Scholar
Canfield, R.C., Fan, Y., Leka, K.D., Mccymont, A.N., Wiilser, J., Lites, B.W., and Zirin, H. 1991, Solar Polarimetry, ed November, L., NSO/SP Summer Workshop Series No. 11, p. 296.Google Scholar
Canfield, R.C., de La Beaujardiere, J.-F., Fan, Y., Leka, K.D., McClymont, A.N., Metcalf, T.R., Mickey, D.L., Wiilser, J-P., and Lites, B.W. 1992 submitted to Ap. J. Google Scholar
Chen, J., and Zhang, H. 1992, Acta Astrophysica Sinica, 12, 82.Google Scholar
Cuperman, S., Ofman, L., and Semel, M. 1990, A and A, 227, 227.Google Scholar
DeLoach, A.C., Hagyard, M.J., Rabin, D., Moore, R.L., Smith, J.B. Jr., West, E.A., and Tandberg-Hanssen, E. 1984, Sol. Phys., 91, 235.Google Scholar
Ding, Y., Hagyard, M.J., Deloach, A.C., Hong, Q.F., and Liu, X.P. 1987, Sol. Phys., 109, 307.Google Scholar
Gary, G.A., Moore, R.L., Hagyard, M.J., and Haisch, B.M. 1987, Ap. J., 314, 782.Google Scholar
Gary, G.A. and Hagyard, M.J. 1990, Sol. Phys., 126, 21.Google Scholar
Hagyard, M.J. 1988, Sol. Phys., 115, 107.Google Scholar
Hagyard, M.J. 1990, Mem. S.A. It, Vol.61, No.2, 337.Google Scholar
Hagyard, M.J., Low, B.C., and Tandberg-Hanssen, E. 1981, Sol. Phys., 73, 257.Google Scholar
Hagyard, M.J., Smith, J.B. Jr., Teuber, D., and West, E.A. 1984, Sol. Phys., 91, 115.Google Scholar
Hagyard, M.J., West, E.A., and Smith, J.B. Jr. 1985, in Proceedings of the Kunming Workshop on Solar Physics and Interplanetary Traveling Phenomena, ed de Jagar, C. and Chen, B., Science Press, Beijing, P. 179.Google Scholar
Hagyard, M.J. and Rabin, D.M. 1986, Adv. Space Res., 6, 7.Google Scholar
Haisch, B.M., Bruner, M.E., Harvey, M.J., and Bonnet, R.M. 1986, AP. J., 300, 428.Google Scholar
Harvey, J.W. 1969, Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado University.Google Scholar
Ichimoto, K., Sakurai, T., Nishino, Y., Shinoda, K., Noguchi, M., Imai, H, Irie, M, Miyashita, M., Tanaka, N., and Sano, I. 1993, this volume.Google Scholar
Krall, K.R., Smith, J.B., Hagyard, M.J., West, E.A., and Cummings, N.P. 1982, Sol. Phys., 79, 59.Google Scholar
Leka, K.D., Canfield, R.C., McMlymont, A.N., Fan, Y., and Tang, F. 1992, submitted to Ap.J.Google Scholar
Lin, Y. and Gaizauskas, V. 1987, Sol. Phys., 109, 81.Google Scholar
Lin, Y., Wei, X., and Zhang, H. 1993, this volume.Google Scholar
Lites, B.W., Elmore, D.F., Tomczyk, S., Seagragves, P., Skumanich, A., and Streander, K.V. 1993, this volume.Google Scholar
Mickey, D.L., Canfield, R.C., LaBonte, B.J., and Smith, W.H. 1992, private communication.Google Scholar
Ming, C, Han, F., Zhang, H., Ai, G., and Kong, F. 1988, Acta Astronomica Sinica, 29, 346.Google Scholar
O’byrne, J.W., Rust, D.M., and Harris, T. 1989, Bull AAS, 21(2), 849.Google Scholar
Sakurai, T., Makita, M., and Shibasaki, K. 1985, in Theoretical Problems in High Resolution Solar Physics, ed. Schmidt, H.U., MPA 212, p.313.Google Scholar
Seehafer, N. 1990, Sol. Phys., 125, 219.Google Scholar
Shi, Z., Wang, J., and Patterson, A. 1986, BBSO ≠257.Google Scholar
Title, A. 1993, this volume.Google Scholar
Wang, H. and Lin, Y. 1993, this volume.Google Scholar
Wang, J. 1992, Acta Astrophysica Sinica, 12, 75.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L.K., Emslie, A.G., and Gary, G.A. 1989, Sol. Phys., 119, 77.Google Scholar
Wu, L. 1993, this volume.Google Scholar
Wu, L. and Ai, G. 1990, Acta Astrophysica Sinica, 10, 371.Google Scholar