We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Aldrich, D.P., Oum, S. and Sawada, Y. (eds) (2015). Resilience and Recovery in Asian Disasters. Community Ties, Market Mechanisms, and Governance. Tokyo. Springer Japan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baverstock, K. (2014). 2013 UNSCEAR Report on Fukushima. A critical appraisal. Egaku84(10), 1–8.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society. Toward a New Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. and Wildawsky, A. (1982). Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: UC Press.Google Scholar
Feld, S. and Basso, K. (1996). Senses of Place. Santa Fe: SAR Press.Google Scholar
Fortun, K. (2001). Advocacy after Bhopal: Environmentalism, Disaster, New Global Orders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ICRP. (1966). Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 9. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Kimura, A.H. (2016). Radiation Brain Moms. The Gender Politics of Food Contamination after Fukushima. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kimura, A.H. (2017). Citizen science in post-Fukushima Japan: the gendered scientization of radiation measurement, Science as Culture28(3), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2017.1347154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumaki, H. (2022). Suspending nuclearity: ecologics of planting seeds after the nuclear fallout in Fukushima, Japan. Cultural Anthropology37(4), 707–737. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca37.4.05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morimoto, R. (2021). Ethnographic lettering: “Pursed Lips: A Call to Suspend Damage in the Age of Decommissioning”, criticalasianstudies.org Commentary Board, March 22. https://doi.org/10.52698/ASPR7364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polleri, M. (2019). Conflictual collaboration: citizen science and the governance of radioactive contamination after the Fukushima nuclear disaster. American Ethnologist46(2), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, D.H., Morioka, R. and Danzuka, H. (2014). Micropolitics of radiation. Critical Asian Studies46(3), 485–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2014.935138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Chernobyl Forum: 2003–2005 (second revised edition). (2006). Chernobyl's Legacy: Health, Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts and Recommendations to the Governments of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine. IAEA Division of Public information, Vienna.Google Scholar
Tsuda, T., Y., Miyano and E., Yamamoto (2022). Demonstrating the undermining of science and health policy after the Fukushima nuclear accident by applying the toolkit for detecting misused epidemiological methods. Environmental Health21, 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00884-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuck, E. (2009). Suspending damage: a letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review79(3), 409–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar