Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:47:42.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The limits of international adjudication: authority and resistance of regional economic courts in times of crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2018

Salvatore Caserta  and
Pola Cebulak
Salvatore Caserta*
Affiliation:
Postdoc at iCourts, Danish National Research Foundation's Centre of Excellence for International Courts
Pola Cebulak
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor in European Law, University of Amsterdam, and formerly Postdoc at iCourts, University of Copenhagen
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: salvatore.caserta@jur.ku.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper compares the involvement of four regional economic courts in legal disputes mirroring constitutional, political and social crises at national or regional levels. These four judicial bodies of the EU, the Andean Community, the East African Community and the Central American Integration System have all faced varied forms of resistance to their involvement and their general authority. By comparing these four case-studies from across the globe, the paper identifies institutional and contextual factors that explain the uneven resistance. While the regional economic courts in Central America and East Africa were subject to backlash from the Member States, their counterparts in Europe and Latin America avoided backlash but at the price of achieving only a narrow authority.

Keywords

regional economic courtsrule of lawcrisesresistanceauthority of international courts
Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 14 , Special Issue 2: Resistance to International Courts , June 2018 , pp. 275 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alter, KJ (2014) The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, KJ and Helfer, LR (2010) Nature or nurture? Judicial law making in the European Court of Justice and the Andean Tribunal of Justice. International Organizations 64, 563–592.Google Scholar
Alter, KJ and Helfer, LR (2017) Transplanting International Courts: The Law and Politics of the Andean Tribunal of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, KJ, Gathii, JT and Helfer, LR (2016 a) Backlash against international courts in West, East, and Southern Africa: causes and consequences. European Journal of International Law 27, 293–328.Google Scholar
Alter, KJ, Helfer, LR and Guerzovitch, FM (2009) Islands of effective international adjudication: constructing an intellectual property rule of law in the Andean community. American Journal of International Law 103, 1–46.Google Scholar
Alter, KJ, Helfer, LR and Madsen, MR (2016 b) How context shapes the authority of international courts. Law and Contemporary Problems 79, 1–36.Google Scholar
Batory, A (2017) Referendums in the ‘new’ Member States: politicisation after a decade of support. In Benjamin, L, Nicholas, S and Usherwood, S (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Euroscepticism. London/New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, pp. 256–267.Google Scholar
Bermeo, N (2016) On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy 27, 5–19.Google Scholar
Blauberger, M and Schmidt, SK (2017) The European Court of Justice and its political impact. West European Politics 40, 907–918.Google Scholar
Buchanan, A and Keohane, R (2006) The legitimacy of global governance institutions. Ethics and International Affairs 20, 405–437.Google Scholar
Burt, J-M and Mauceri, P (2004) Politics in the Andes: Identity, Conflict, Reform. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Caserta, S (2016) Institutionalizing Regional International Courts: Creation, Authority and Power of the Central American and Caribbean Courts of Justice, (PhD thesis), Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Caserta, S (2017 a) Regional integration through law: the central American and Caribbean cases. Leiden Journal of International Law 30, 579–601.Google Scholar
Caserta, S (2017 b) Regional international courts in search of relevance: adjudicating politically sensitive disputes in central America and the Caribbean. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 28, 59–97.Google Scholar
Closa, C and Kochenov, D (eds) (2016) Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, G (2014) Legislative control of the european court of justice. Common Market Law Review 51, 1579–1607.Google Scholar
Drake, PW and Hershberg, E (2006) State and Society in Conflict: Comparative Perspective on Andean Crises. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Ebobroah, ST (2013) International human rights courts. In Romano, CPR , Alter, KJ and Shany, Y (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 225–248.Google Scholar
European Commission (2017) Rule of law: European Commission acts to defend judicial independence in Poland, press release, 20 December. Available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-5367_en.htm (accessed 8 March 2018).Google Scholar
Gastorn, K (2015) The inevitable reforms of the legislative competencies of the East African Legislative Assembly. VRÜ Verfassung und Recht in Übersee 48, 28–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathii, JT (2012) Mission creep or a search for relevance: the East African Court of Justice's human rights strategy. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 24, 249–296.Google Scholar
Gathii, JT (2016) Variation in the use of subregional integration courts between business and human rights actors: the case of the East African Court of Justice. Law and Contemporary Problems 79, 37–62.Google Scholar
Gostyńska-Jakubowska, A (2016) Why the commission is treating Poland more harshly than Hungary in its rule of law review, LSE Blog, 4 February 2016. Available at http://bit.ly/1o9D4Pj (accessed 28 February 2018).Google Scholar
Gotev, G (2017 a) Hungarian vote badly divides EPP Group, Euractiv, 18 May. Available at https://www.euractiv.com/section/freedom-of-thought/news/hungarian-vote-badly-divides-epp-group/ (accessed 28 February 2018).Google Scholar
Gotev, G (2017 b) With Hungarian support, Poland defies EU over rule of law, Euractiv, 21 February. Available at https://www.euractiv.com/section/justice-home-affairs/news/supported-by-hungary-poland-defies-eu-over-rule-of-law/ (accessed 28 February 2018).Google Scholar
Helfer, LR and Slaughter, A-M (1997) Toward a theory of effective supranational adjudication. Yale Law Journal 107, 273–392.Google Scholar
Hillion, C (2016) Overseeing the rule of law in the EU: legal mandate and means. In Carlos, C and Dimitry, K (eds), Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 59–81.Google Scholar
Hirschl, R (2008) The judicialization of mega-politics and the rise of political courts. Annual Review of Political Science 11, 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaltwasser, CR et al. (eds) (2017) The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelemen, DR (2013) Judicialisation, democracy and European integration. Representation 49, 295–308.Google Scholar
Kelemen, DR (2016) The Court of Justice of the European Union in the twenty-first century. Law and Contemporary Problems 79, 117–140.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B (2011) International Courts: Uneven Judicialization in Global Order, NYU School of Law Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Working Paper N.11–05, 1–22.Google Scholar
Koncewicz, TT (2017) Understanding the politics of resentment, verfassungsblog. Available at http://verfassungsblog.de/understanding-the-politics-of-resentment/ (accessed 28 February 2018).Google Scholar
Kosař, D and Šipulová, K (2017) The strasbourg court meets abusive constitutionalism: Baka v. Hungary and the rule of law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 1–28. Available at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40803-017-0065-y (accessed 19 April 2018).Google Scholar
Lenaerts, K (2009) Le traité de lisbonne et la protection juridictionnelle des particuliers en droit de l'union. Cahiers du Droit Europeen 5, 711–745.Google Scholar
Levrat, N (2004) Valeurs démocratiques contre procédures démocratiques. In Levrat, N and Rider, JL (eds), La Crise Autrichienne de la Culture Politique Europpéenne. Brussels/Bern/Berlin/Frankfurt Am Mein/New York/Oxford/Vienna: P.I.E. Peter Lang, pp. 152–165.Google Scholar
Madsen, MR, Cebulak, P and Wiebusch, M (2018) Backlash against international courts: explaining the forms and patterns of resistance to international courts. International Journal of Law in Context 14, 5–28.Google Scholar
Malamud, C (2006) Venezuela's Withdrawal from the Andean Community of Nations and the Consequences for Regional Integration, Real Instituto Elcano Working Paper (WP) 28/2006, 30 May. Available at http://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/wcm/connect/e2093c004f018b51b3cbf73170baead1/ARI54-2006_Malamud_Venezuela_CAN_partI.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=e2093c004f018b51b3cbf73170baead1 (accessed 19 April 2018).Google Scholar
Matczak, M (2017) How to demolish an independent judiciary with the help of a constitutional court, verfassungsblog. Available at http://verfassungsblog.de/how-to-demolish-an-independent-judiciary-with-the-help-of-a-constitutional-court/ (accessed 28 February 2018).Google Scholar
Mudde, C (2016) On Extremism and Democracy in Europe. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nyman-Metcalf, K and Papageorgiou, I (2005) Regional Integration and Courts of Justice. Antwerp/Oxford: Intersentia.Google Scholar
Odermatt, J (2018) Patterns of avoidance: political questions before international courts. International Journal of Law in Context 14, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Onoria, H (2010) Botched-up elections, treaty amendments and judicial independence in the East African community. Journal of African Law 54, 74–94.Google Scholar
Romano, CPR, Alter, KJ and Shany, Y (eds) (2014) The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saldias, O (2013) The Judicial Politics of Economic Integration: The Andean Court as an Engine of Development. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sanahuja, JA (2011) Post-Liberal Regionalism in South America: The Case of UNASUR, EUI RSCAS Working Papers 2012/05, European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/1814/20394 (accessed 8 March 2018).Google Scholar
Schepple, KL (2015) Understanding Hungary's constitutional revolution in constitutional crisis in the European constitutional area. In von Bogdandy, A and Sonnevend, P (eds), Theory, Law and Politics in Hungary and Romania. Oxford/Portland, OR: C.H.BECK – Hart – Nomos, pp. 111–124.Google Scholar
Shany, Y (2014) Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soley, X and Steininger, S (2018) Parting ways or lashing back? Withdrawals, backlash and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. International Journal of Law in Context 14, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A (1999) Judicialization and the construction of governance. Comparative Political Studies 31, 147–184.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M (2009) Judicial leadership. In Kane, J, Patapan, H and Hart, P (eds), Dispersed Democratic Leadership: Origins, Dynamics, and Implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 141–158.Google Scholar
Von Bogdandy, A and Venzke, I (2014) In Whose Name? A Public Law Theory of International Adjudication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar