Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T09:20:57.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

William Twining: the man who radicalised the middle ground

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2021

David Sugarman*
Affiliation:
Professor Emeritus, Law School, Lancaster University; Senior Associate Research Fellow, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, University of London; Senior Associate, Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, University of Oxford
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: d.sugarman@lancaster.ac.uk

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This essay draws on conversations, interviews and e-mail exchanges with William Twining over many years. All interpretations of his life and work are mine alone.

References

Arthurs, HW (2019) Connecting the Dots: The Life of an Academic Lawyer. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartie, S (2010) The lingering core of legal scholarship. Legal Studies 30, 345369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevan, A (1953) Quoted in The Observer, 6 December.Google Scholar
Collier, R (2005) We're all socio-legal now? Sydney Law Review 26, 503536.Google Scholar
Galanter, M (1974) Why the ‘haves’ come out ahead. Law and Society Review 9, 95160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, RW (1992–1993) Lawyers, scholars and the ‘middle ground’. Michigan Law Review 91, 20752112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, RW (2002) Modes of legal education and the social conditions that sustain them. SELA Papers. Paper 5, Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository, 9.Google Scholar
McCann, M (1994) Rights at Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mertz, E (2007) The Language of Law School. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelken, D (2009) Beyond Law in Context. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pollock, F (1933) For My Grandson: Remembrances of an Ancient Victorian. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Sandomierski, D (2020) Aspiration and Reality in Legal Education. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheingold, SA (2004) The Politics of Rights. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, AWB (2011) Reflections on The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugarman, D (1986) Legal theory, the common law mind and the making of the textbook tradition. In Twining, W (ed.) Legal Theory and Common Law. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 2662.Google Scholar
Sugarman, D (2009) Beyond ignorance and complacency: Robert Stevens’ journey through Lawyers and the Courts. International Journal of the Legal Profession 16, 731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugarman, D (2011) A special relationship? American influences on English legal education, c. 1870–1965. International Journal of the Legal Profession 18, 757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugarman, D (2012) Brian Simpson's approach to legal scholarship and the significance of Reflections on ‘The Concept of Law’. Transnational Legal Theory 3, 112126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlins, C (2007) How autonomous is law? Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3, 4568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twining, W (2009) Punching our weight? Legal scholarship and public understanding. Legal Studies 29, 519533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twining, W (2018) Rethinking legal education. Law Teacher 52, 241260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twining, W (2019) Jurist in Context: A Memoir. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twining, WL (1967) Pericles and the plumber. Law Quarterly Review 83, 396426.Google Scholar
Twining, W and Sugarman, D (2020) Jurist in context: William Twining in conversation with David Sugarman. Journal of Law and Society 47, 195220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar