No CrossRef data available.
PP100 Economic Evaluation Of A New Non-Antibiotic First-line Treatment Of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 January 2018
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
INTRODUCTION:
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common in female patients in general practice. These bacterial infections affect half of all women at least once in their life. Antibiotics are usually prescribed for UTIs, and continuous low antimicrobial prophylaxis is administered to patients at high risk of recurrent UTI (rUTIs) (1). However, a major concern arises due to the increased rates of severe treatment-related side effects and emergence of antimicrobial resistance, which makes rUTIs management more challenging while seeking the use of more expensive alternatives. On this basis, clinical evaluations of rUTI interventions should be accompanied by economic evaluations in order to guide healthcare policy and decision processes about healthcare resources allocation. The aim of this work was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of a novel effective non-antibiotic treatment option for prophylaxis of female patients with a history of rUTIs, based on intravesical administration of hyaluronic acid (HA) plus chondroitin sulfate (CS), as compared to recommended 1st-line antibiotic therapy (2).
METHODS:
A cost-utility analysis was performed in order to estimate the effectiveness of each treatment, according to the number of UTIs annual episodes, and the incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER) for patients with UTI, starting from data collected during a multicentric observational case-cross-over clinical trial involving seven European centers (2). The economic model includes the costs of HA treatment and the costs associated with each UTI, such as costs of UTI diagnostics and antibiotic treatment, additional care by the elderly-care physician, additional nursing care, and hospitalizations, as well as the expected QALY, measured through the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaires administered to patients, for both groups (3).
RESULTS:
At this stage, preliminary findings suggest that HA plus CS is a cost-effective alternative to antibiotics for the treatment of recurrent UTIs, that could reduce UTIs events in female patients with a history of recurrent UTI at an acceptable cost.
CONCLUSIONS:
The results of this study support the use of HA plus CS against antimicrobials as 1st-line therapy in the management of rUTIs.
- Type
- Poster Presentations
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018
References
REFERENCES:
1. Ciani, O, Arendsen, E, Romancik, M, et al. Intravesical administration of combined hyaluronic acid (HA) and chondroitin sulfate (CS) for the treatment of female recurrent urinary tract infections: a European multicentre nested case-control study, BMJ Open. 2016;6 (3):e009669. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009669.Google Scholar
2. Cicione, A, Cantiello, F, Ucciero, G, et al. Intravesical treatment with highly-concentrated hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulphate in patients with recurrent urinary tract infections: Results from a multicentre survey, Can Urol Assoc J. 2014 Sep-Oct; 8 (9–10):E721–E727, Published online 2014 Oct 22. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1989, PMCID: PMC4216305.Google Scholar
3. Damiano, R., Quarto, G, Bava, I, et al. Prevention of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections by Intravesical Administration of Hyaluronic Acid and Chondroitin Sulphate: A Placebo-Controlled Randomised Trial, Eur Urol. 2011 Apr;59 (4):645–51. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.039. Epub 2011 Jan 18.Google Scholar
You have
Access