Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
2007.
Current World Literature.
Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 6,
p.
605.
Scheibler, Fülöp
Scheike, Inger M.
and
Dintsios, Charalabos-Markos
2008.
Patientenpartizipation bei Festlegung und Gewichtung von Behandlungszielen – Status quo und Entwicklungspotenziale.
Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen,
Vol. 102,
Issue. 6,
p.
373.
Potter, Beth K.
Avard, Denise
Graham, Ian D.
Entwistle, Vikki A.
Caulfield, Timothy A.
Chakraborty, Pranesh
Kennedy, Christine
McGuire, Marissa
Griener, Glenn G.
Montgomery, Mark
Wells, George A.
and
Wilson, Brenda J.
2008.
Guidance for considering ethical, legal, and social issues in health technology assessment: Application to genetic screening.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 04,
p.
412.
Husereau, Don
Morrison, Andra
Battista, Renaldo
and
Goeree, Ron
2009.
Health Technology Assessment: A Review of International Activity and Examples of Approaches With Computed Tomographic Colonography.
Journal of the American College of Radiology,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 5,
p.
343.
Gauvin, Francois-Pierre
Abelson, Julia
Giacomini, Mita
Eyles, John
and
Lavis, John N.
2010.
“It all depends”: Conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies.
Social Science & Medicine,
Vol. 70,
Issue. 10,
p.
1518.
Facey, Karen
Boivin, Antoine
Gracia, Javier
Hansen, Helle Ploug
Lo Scalzo, Alessandra
Mossman, Jean
and
Single, Ann
2010.
Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: A route to robust evidence and fair deliberation.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 3,
p.
334.
Nielsen, Camilla PalmhøJ
Funch, Tina Maria
and
Kristensen, Finn Børlum
2011.
Health technology assessment: Research trends and future priorities in Europe.
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 2_suppl,
p.
6.
Danner, Marion
Hummel, J. Marjan
Volz, Fabian
van Manen, Jeannette G.
Wiegard, Beate
Dintsios, Charalabos-Markos
Bastian, Hilda
Gerber, Andreas
and
IJzerman, Maarten J.
2011.
Integrating patients' views into health technology assessment: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as a method to elicit patient preferences.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 4,
p.
369.
Menon, Devidas
and
Stafinski, Tania
2011.
Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions.
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 1,
p.
75.
Ahern, Eleanor
Thavaneswaran, Prema
Babidge, Wendy
and
Maddern, Guy J.
2011.
Consumer perspectives in surgical research and audit.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 4,
p.
337.
Gauvin, François-Pierre
Abelson, Julia
Giacomini, Mita
Eyles, John
and
Lavis, John N.
2011.
Moving cautiously: Public involvement and the health technology assessment community.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 1,
p.
43.
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
Desmartis, Marie
Lepage-Savary, Dolorès
Gagnon, Johanne
St-Pierre, Michèle
Rhainds, Marc
Lemieux, Renald
Gauvin, Francois-Pierre
Pollender, Hugo
and
Légaré, France
2011.
Introducing patients' and the public's perspectives to health technology assessment: A systematic review of international experiences.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 1,
p.
31.
Deverka, Patricia A
Lavallee, Danielle C
Desai, Priyanka J
Esmail, Laura C
Ramsey, Scott D
Veenstra, David L
and
Tunis, Sean R
2012.
Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement.
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 2,
p.
181.
Messina, Josie
and
Grainger, David L.
2012.
A Pilot Study to Identify Areas for Further Improvements in Patient and Public Involvement in Health Technology Assessments for Medicines.
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 3,
p.
199.
Lavallee, Danielle C
Williams, Carla J
Tambor, Ellen S
and
Deverka, Patricia A
2012.
Stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: how will we measure success?.
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 5,
p.
397.
Messina, Josie
and
Grainger, David. L.
2012.
A Pilot Study to Identify Areas for Further Improvements in Patient and Public Involvement in Health Technology Assessments for Medicines.
The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 3,
p.
199.
Whitty, Jennifer A.
2013.
An International Survey of the Public Engagement Practices of Health Technology Assessment Organizations.
Value in Health,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 1,
p.
155.
Drummond, Michael
Tarricone, Rosanna
and
Torbica, Aleksandra
2013.
Assessing the Added Value of Health Technologies: Reconciling Different Perspectives.
Value in Health,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 1,
p.
S7.
Kreis, Julia
and
Schmidt, Harald
2013.
Public Engagement in Health Technology Assessment and Coverage Decisions: A Study of Experiences in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 1,
p.
89.
Hailey, David
Werkö, Sophie
Bakri, Rugayah
Cameron, Alun
Göhlen, Britta
Myles, Susan
Pwu, Jasmine
and
Yothasamut, Jomkwan
2013.
INVOLVEMENT OF CONSUMERS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES BY INAHTA AGENCIES.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 1,
p.
79.