Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T15:59:21.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

VP174 Atlases Of Quality: Assessing Integrated Care In Chronic Diseases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2018

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
INTRODUCTION:

The Comprehensive Public Healthcare System of Catalonia (SISCAT) Atlases of Quality aim to evaluate the quality of care in relation to specific diseases or procedures in the Catalan territory with a focus on outcomes of care in order to promote best practices. The first Atlas of Quality aimed to assess the quality of integrated care for chronic patients.

METHODS:

Methodology was articulated in four stages:(i) Establishment of a conceptual framework of reference specific for each intervention/technology being assessed, (ii) Definition and consensus of the assessment indicators, and (iii) Implementation of indicators using the Basic Health Areas (ABS) of Catalonia as a unit of analysis, comparing ABS with vs without the intervention (such as integrated care for chronicity). Indicators were obtained from the SISCAT databases and implemented through risk adjustment models. For performance assessment, we calculated the observed and expected indicator rates for each ABS, and for the benchmarking analysis, these ratios were represented in funnel plots (Confidence Interval, CI 95 percent and 99.8 percent for exclusion zones). (iv) Evaluation of the intervention and identification of specific success factors.

RESULTS:

For the assessment of integrated care interventions for chronicity, the defined framework in stage 1 was base on the Kaiser Pyramid (population distribution), and the Porter and the Donabedian's approaches (structure, processes, outcomes) (1). In stage 2 more than 500 experts, using several qualitative techniques, considered 18 indicators as relevants and feasibles for the assessment (2). Ten of them were implemented in stage 3 for congestive heart failure and pulmonary obstructive chronic disease. Significant values were found both in ABS with and without chronicity care programms (phase 3).

CONCLUSIONS:

The subsequent analysis (phase 4) will allow identification of practices of each ABS that best explain these results. Some limitations must be considered such as the availability of the consensued indicators in the SISCAT databases.

Type
Vignette Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

References

REFERENCES:

1. Grup de Treball d'Avaluació de la Cronicitat. Desenvolupament d'un marc conceptual i indicadors per avaluar l'atenció a la cronicitat. Primer informe. Barcelona: Agència de Qualitat i Avaluació Sanitàries de Catalunya. Departament de Salut. Generalitat de Catalunya; 2013.Google Scholar
2. Grup de Treball d'Avaluació de la Cronicitat. Desenvolupament d'un marc conceptual i indicadors per avaluar l'atenció a la cronicitat. Segon informe. Barcelona: Agència de Qualitat i Avaluació Sanitàries de Catalunya. Departament de Salut. Generalitat de Catalunya; 2013.Google Scholar