Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:56:02.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Crop Damage Caused by the Sugar-cane Borer, Diatraea saccharalis (F.), and the Ratoon Stunting Disease Bacterium on Sugar-cane Yield in Louisiana*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

E. O. Ogunwolu
Affiliation:
Louisiana Agricultural Experimental Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Centre, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA
T. E. Reagan
Affiliation:
Louisiana Agricultural Experimental Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Centre, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA
K. E. Damann Jr.
Affiliation:
Louisiana Agricultural Experimental Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Centre, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA
S. D. Hensley Jr
Affiliation:
Louisiana Agricultural Experimental Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Centre, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA
Get access

Abstract

The sugar-cane borer (SCB), Diatraea saccharalis (F.), and the ratoon stunting disease (RSD) bacterium independently caused significant reductions in stalk weight, cane tonnage and sugar yield. A three-fold difference was found in the comparison of per cent loss of cane tonnage due to RSD alone with that due to the disease in combination with SCB damage in first ratoon sugar-cane. Variance analysis failed to detect interaction between damage by SCB and that by RSD. The data analysed were obtained from an experiment of six replication which evaluated the effects of SCB damage and RSD on sugar-cane yield in Louisiana. We used the randomized complete-block experimental design with split-plot arrangement of treatments. Three schedules of insecticide application to the growing cane, against SCB were the main plots whilst the subplots comprised of RSD inoculation vs. no inoculation of sugar-cane plants grown from seed canes with light vs. severe SCB damage.

Résumé

La canne à sucre foreur (SCB), Diatraea saccharalis (F.), et la maladie d'état rabougri de ratoon (RSD) bacteria causent séparement des diminutions en poids de l'approche, le tonnage de la canne, et la production du sucre dans une six réproduction, fait au hasard complete, en utilisant le niveau de dégâts de SCB sur la canne croissante comme les terrains entiers et la combinaision de deux types de graines de canne, plus deux autres niveaux de RSD comme sous-terrains. Une différence était découverte on trois catégories dans la comparaison pour cent perte de tonnage, de canne occasioné par le RSD seulement, par contraste avec cela occasioné a la maladie en commbinaision avec SCB dégâts dans la prémière ratoon canne à sucre. Une analyse donnée par une procédé incompatible ou par des méthodes de regressions, échouent de découvir la réciproque ou une corrélation entre le dégât par le SCB et celui par le RSD.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abbott, E. V. (1954) Progress report on the study of stunting disease. Sugar Bull. 32, 170171.Google Scholar
Ayquipa, G. E., Sirlopu, J. D. and Angulo, E. E. (1979) Influencia de Diatraea saccharalis en el brotamiento y macollamiento de la cana de azucar. (Influence of Diatraea saccharalis on the germination and tillering of sugar-cane). Rev. Per. Ent. 22, 3335.Google Scholar
Charpentier, L. J., Mathes, R., McCormick, W. J. and Sanford, J. W. (1965) Injury and losses caused by the sugar-cane borer in Louisiana. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 12, 13831387.Google Scholar
Damann, K. E. Jr, (1983) Detection of ratoon stunting disease of sugar-cane by metaxylem autofluorescence. Phytopath. 73, 500.Google Scholar
Damann, K. E. Jr and Benda, G. T. A. (1983) Evaluation of commercial heat treatment methods for control of ratoon stunting disease of sugar-cane. Plant Disease 67, 966967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damann, K. E. Jr, Ogunwolu, E. O. and Reagan, T. E. (1983) Ratoon stunting disease in Louisiana sugar-cane: A preliminary survey. Louisiana Agriculture 27, 67.Google Scholar
Eiland, R. R. and Lyrene, P. M. (1977) The effect of skips on sugar-cane yield in variety CP 63–588. J. Am. Soc. Sugar-Cane Technol. 6, 2930.Google Scholar
Goodnight, J. H. (1979) SAS User's Guide. SAS Inst. Inc., North Carolina.Google Scholar
Harcourt, D. G. (1970) Crop life tables as a pest management tool. Can. Ent. 102, 950955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensley, S. D. (1971) Management of sugar-cane borer populations in Louisiana, a decade of change. Entomophaga 16, 133146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, W. E. and Osterberger, B. A. (1933) Sugar-cane borer effect upon value of seed cane. La. Agric. Exp. Stn Bull. 240, 111.Google Scholar
Koike, H. (1974) Interaction between diseases on sugar-cane: Sugar-cane mosaic and ratoon stunting disease. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar-Cane Technol. 15, 258265.Google Scholar
Koike, H. (1976) Diseases as a factor influencing sugar-cane yields in Louisiana during the last decade. J. Am. Soc. Sugar-cane Technol. 5, 178181.Google Scholar
Koike, H., Gillapsie, A. G. Jr and Benda, G. T. A. (1982) Cane yield response to ratoon stunting disease. Int. Sugar J. 84, 131133.Google Scholar
Liu, L. J. Ramirez-Oliveras, Serapion, J. L. and Gonzalez-Molina, L. (1979) Further developments in the study of the ratoon stunting disease of sugar-cane in Puerto Rico. J. Agric. Univ. Puerto Rico 63, 146151.Google Scholar
Long, W. H. and Concienne, E. J. (1964) Critical period for controlling the sugar-cane borer in sugar-cane in Louisiana. J. Econ. Ent. 57, 350353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loppe, D. T. (1978) Cultural practice recommendations for sugar-cane production in Louisiana for 1978. Sugar Bull. 56, 1012.Google Scholar
Lopez-Rosa, J. H. and Adsuar, J. (1970) Effect of ratoon stunting disease on yield of some sugar-cane varieties in Puerto Rico. J. Agric. Univ. Puerto Rico 54, 149160.Google Scholar
Mathes, R., McGuire, J. W. Jr and Charpentier, L. J. (1965) First ratoon crop yields affected by sugar-cane borer damage to plant cane. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar-cane Technol. 12, 13971400.Google Scholar
Mathes, R., McCormick, W. J. and Charpentier, L. J. (1968) Components of aggregate crop loss caused by the sugarcane borer. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar-cane Technol. 13, 12961299.Google Scholar
McMartin, A. (1949) Sugar-cane yields as influenced by crop development. The S. Afr. Sugar J. 23, 451461.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J. R. (1969) The estimation of loss caused by sugar-cane moth borers. Pests of Sugar-cane. (Edited by Williams, J. R., Metcalfe, J. R., Mungomery, R. W. and Mathes, R.). Elsevier Publ. Co., New York.Google Scholar
Pollett, D. K., Reagan, T. E. and Hensley, S. D. (1978) Pest management of sugar-cane insects. La Coop Ext. Publ.Google Scholar
Roe Richard, M., Hammond, A. M. Jr, Reagan, T. E. and Hensley, S. D. (1981) A bibliography of the sugar-cane borer, Diatraea saccharalis (Fabricius), 1887–1980. Agric. Reviews and Manuals ARM-S-20/Nov. 1981, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Steib, R. J. (1981) The ratoon stunting disease of sugar-cane and its control by use of an aerated steam treatment. Proc. First Inter-American Sugar-cane Seminar on Cane Diseases—1980 pp. 107108. Florida International University, Miami, Florida.Google Scholar
Steib, R. J. and Chilton, J. P. (1959) Control and rate of increase of the ratoon stunting disease in hot-air treated sugar-cane in Louisiana. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar-cane Technol. 10, 10611068.Google Scholar
Steib, R. J. and Chilton, J. P. (1965) Interrelationship studies of mosaic and ratoon stunting diseases in sugar-cane in Louisiana. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar-cane Technol. 12, 10611070.Google Scholar
Steib, R. J. and Chilton, J. P. (1974) Losses due to sugar-cane mosaic reduced by use of a greater amount of seed cane. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar-cane Technol. 15, 300304.Google Scholar
Williams, J. R., Metcalfe, J. R., Mungomery, R. W. and Mathes, R. (1969) Pests of sugar-cane. Elsevier Publ. Co., New York.Google Scholar