Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:28:20.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of host-plant resistance in pest management in sorghum in india*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

K. Leuschner ,
S. L. Taneja  and
H. C. Sharma
K. Leuschner
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru PO, Andhra Pradesh 502 324, India
S. L. Taneja
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru PO, Andhra Pradesh 502 324, India
H. C. Sharma
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru PO, Andhra Pradesh 502 324, India
Get access

Abstract

The paper stresses the fact that an integrated pest management system is not a new concept leading to a more stable agroecosystem, but was practiced by the farmers for centuries; host-plant resistance is one of its major components. The system was destabilized by the introduction of new sorghum varieties and hybrids not resistant against the major sorghum insect pests like shootfly Atherigona soccata (Rondani); stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe); midge, Contarinia sorghicola (Coquillet); and headbugs, Calocoris angustatus (Lethiery). In order to balance the agroecosystem again, an integrated insect pest management system for sorghum has to be developed based on traditional pest management practices. These are host-plant resistance, cultural control and biological control. Insecticides should be used only if absolutely necessary. For a better understanding of such a control approach, a summary of the biology and population dynamics of the major insects is given, together with a brief account on the levels and mechanisms of host-plant resistance so far known. Based on this information, the rainfall pattern, plant duration to maturity, time of planting, natural enemies and insecticides, a sorghum based integrated pest management system is proposed for the monsoon and post-monsoon season in which host-plant resistance alone or in combination with the above mentioned control methods could be used.

Résumé

L'article souligne qu'un système intégré de contrôle des insectes n'est pas un nouveau concept conduisant à un agroécosystème plus stable, mais qu'il a été pratiqué pendant des siècles, par des agriculteurs, la résistance de la plante hôte est un de ses composés majeurs. Le système a été déstabilisé par l'introduction de nouvelles variétés de sorgho et des hybrides non résistant aux insectes majeurs nuisibles au sorgho tels que Atherigona soccata (Rondani), le Chilo partellus (Swinhoe), le Contarinia sorghicola (coquillet) et les Calocoris angustatus (Lethiery). Pour réequilibrer l'agroécosystème, un système intégré de contrôle des insectus nuisibles au sorgho doit être développé, basé sur les pratiques traditionelles de contrôle des insectus suivantes; résistance de la plante hôte, contrôle cultural, contrôle biologique. Les insecticides ne doivent être utilisés que quand c'est absolument nécessaire. Pour une meilleure compréhension d'une telle approche, un résumé des dynamiques de la biologie et de la population des insectes importants est donné avec un text bref expliquant les niveaux et mecanismes connus de la résistance de la plante hôte. Sur la base de ces informations, les types de précipitations, la période avant maturité, moment de la plantation, les ennemis naturels et les insecticides, un système intégré de contrôle des insectes nuisibles au sorgho est proposé pour la mousson et la saison suivant la mousson dans lequel la résistance de la plante hôte seule ou en combinaison avec les méthodes de contrôle citées plus haut pourrait être utilisé.

Keywords

Sorghum shootflystem borermidgeheadbugshost-plant resistanceintegrated pest managementIndiaAtherigona soccata (Rondani)Chilo partellus (Swinhoe)Contarinia sorghicola (Coquillet)Calocoris angustatus (Lethiery)résistance de la plante hôtecontrôle intégré des insectesInde
Type
Section VI: Host plant resistance and pest management
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 6 , Special Issue 3: Host Plant Resistance and its Significance in Pest Management , June 1985 , pp. 453 - 460
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adkisson, P. L. and Dyck, V. A. (1980) Resistant varieties in pest management systems. In Breeding Plants Resistance to Insects (Edited by Maxwell, F. G. and Jennings, P. R.), pp. 233–251. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Dabrowski, Z. T. and Kidiaval, E. L. (1983) Resistance of some sorghum lines to the spotted stalk borer Chilo partellus under western Kenya conditions. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 119–126.Google Scholar
Dogget, H. (1972) Breeding for resistance to sorghum shootfly in Uganda. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on control of Sorghum Shootfly (Edited by Jotwani, M. G. and Young, W. R.), pp. 192–201. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi.Google Scholar
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) (1982) Annual Report. Patancheru, India.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. W., Rosenow, D. T. and Teetes, G. L. (1973) Resistance to the sorghum midge in converted exotic sorghum cultivars. Crop Sci. 13, 754–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jotwani, M. G., Srivastava, K. P., Kundu, C. G., Kishore, P. and Sukhani, T. R. (1978) Management of the stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) infesting sorghum through the use of resistant varieties and chemical control. J. ent. Res. 2, 203–205.Google Scholar
Jotwani, M. G., Young, W. R. and Teetes, G. L. (1980) Elements of integrated control of sorghum pests. FAO plant production and protection paper, FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Pant, N. C., Pathak, M. D. and Pant, J. C. (1961) Resistance of Chilo zonellus (Swin.) in diiferent host plants. Indian J. Ent. 23, 128–136.Google Scholar
Raina, A. K., Thindwa, H. Z., Othieno, S. M. and Corkhill, R. T. (1981) Resistance in sorghum to the sorghum snootily: Larval development and adult longitivity and fecundity on selected cultivars. Insect Sci. Applic. 2, 99–103.Google Scholar
Seshu Reddy, K. V. and Davies, J. C. (1979) Pests of sorghum and pearl millet and their parasites and predators, recorded at ICRISAT Centre, India up to December 1979. Departmental Progress Report, Cereal Entomology—l.Google Scholar
Sharma, H. C., Vidyasagar, P. and Leuschner, K. (1983) Factors influencing host finding and oviposition by the sorghum midge, Contarinia sorghicola. Paper presented at International Conference on Regulation of Insect Reproduction Through Natural Products, 29 September-l October 1983. Regional Research Laboratory, Jammun, India.Google Scholar
Sharma, H. C. (1984a) Future strategies for pest control in sorghum. In National Seminar on Pest Management in Citrus, Cotton, Sugar Cane and Sorghum, 5–7 January 1984. College of Agriculture, Nagpur, India.Google Scholar
Sharma, H. C. (1984b) Future strategies for pest control in sorghum. Presented at the National Seminar on Pest Management in Citrus, Cotton, Sugar Cane and Sorghum, College of Agriculture, Nagpur, India.Google Scholar
Shimura, I. (1972) Breeding of chestnut varieties to chestnut gall wasp, Dryocosmus kuriphicus Yasumatsa. Jap. agric. Res. Quart. 6, 224–230.Google Scholar
Singh, S. R., Vedamoorty, G., Thobbi, V. V., Jotwani, M. G., Young, W. R., Balan, J. S., Srivastava, K. P., Sandhu, G. S. and Krishnananda, N. (1968) Resistance to stem borer, Chilo zonellus (Swinhoe) and stemfly, Atherigona varia soccata Rond. In the world sorghum collection in India. Mem. ent. Soc. India 7, 79.Google Scholar
Soto, P. E. (1972) Mass rearing of the sorghum snootily and screening for host-plant resistance under green-house conditions. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Control of Sorghum Shootfly (Edited by Jotwani, G. and Young, W. R.), pp. 137–148. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi.Google Scholar
Soto, P. E. (1974) Ovipositional preference and antibiosis in relation to resistance to a sorghum shootfly. J. econ. Ent. 67, 265–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srivastava, K. P. and Jotwani, M. G. (1981) Recent advances in the chemical control of shootfly. Insect Sci. Applic. 2, 117–121.Google Scholar
Swarup, V. and Chaugale, D. S. (1962) A preliminary study on resistance to stemborer, Chilo zonellus (Swin.) in Bombay Province. Indian J. Ent. 24, 47–59.Google Scholar
Teetes, G. L. and Johnson, J. W. (1978) Insect resistance in sorghum. In Proceedings 33rd Annual Corn and Sorghum Research Conference, pp. 167–189. Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Woodhead, S., Bernays, E. H. and Chapman, R. F. (1983) Report of work done during visits to ICRISAT in 1981 and 1982. Collaborative project on the stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe), Centre for Overseas Pest Research/International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.Google Scholar