Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:35:53.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Susceptibility of the human head and body louse, Pediculus humanus (Anoplurar:Pediculidae) to insecticides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

K.Y. Mumcuoglu ,
Jacqueline Miller  and
Rachel Galun
K.Y. Mumcuoglu
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, The Kuvin Center, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, P.O. Box 1172, 91010 Jerusalem, Israel
Jacqueline Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, The Kuvin Center, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, P.O. Box 1172, 91010 Jerusalem, Israel
Rachel Galun
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, The Kuvin Center, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, P.O. Box 1172, 91010 Jerusalem, Israel
Get access

Abstract

The susceptibility of head lice, Pediculus humanus capitis collected from children in Israel and that ofa laboratory colony of body lice, Pediculus humanus humanus to the insecticides malathion, deltamethrin, permethrin, fenitrothion and dieldrin has been evaluated using standard WHO papers. The LT50 and LT95 were established using different exposure times. Deltamethrin had the highest“knock-down”effect, followed by permethrinand malathion. All insecticidesexcept dieldrin gave higher mortality for body lice than for head lice. No differences in the susceptibility between adult and nymph lice could be observed.

Résume

L'activité d'insecticides, malathion, deltamethrine, permethrine, fenitrothion et dieldrine a été etudiée sur les poux de tête, Pediculus humanus capitis ramassés chez des enfants en Israel et sur les p'oux de corps, Pediculus humanus humanus d' un élevage de laboratoire. A cet effet, les papiers standards de l'OMS ont été utilisés. Les DL50 et DL95. ont été determinees a differents temps d'exposition. La meilleure toxicité immediate a été obtenue avec la deltamethrine, suivie de la permethrine et du malathion. Tous les insecticides à l'exception de la dieldrine ont provoqué une mortalité plus elevée pour les poux de corps que pour les poux de tête. Aucune difference de sensibilite entre les poux adultes et les nymphs n'a été observée.

Keywords

Pediculus humanushuman licebase-linesusceptibilityinsecticidesPediculus humanuspoux humainstoxicitéinsecticides
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , April 1990 , pp. 223 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anonymous (1976) Lice—yes, lice again a problem. Infect. Dis. 6, 21.Google Scholar
Armoni, M., Bibi, H., Schlesinger, M., Pollak, S. and Metzker, A. (1988) Pediculosis capitis—why prefer a solution to shampoo or spray. Pediatr. Dermatol. 5, 273–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blommers, L. (1979) Insecticidal tests on immature head lice, Pediculus capitis (Anoplura)—a new technique. J. Med. Entomol. 16, 82–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Blommers, L. (1980) Susceptibility of the head louse for 6 insecticides. Z. Angew. Entomol. 90, 202–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommers, L. and van Lennep, M. (1978a) Head lice in the Netherlands: Susceptibility for insecticides in field samples. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 23, 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommers, L. and van Lennep, M. (1978b) Miscellaneous notes on the toxicity of some insecticides for the head louse, Pediculus capitis De Geer (Anoplura). Acta Leiden. 46, 9–15.Google Scholar
Busvine, J. R. (1967) Inheritance of DDT-resistance to body lice. Bull. W.H.O. 6, 431–434.Google Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1950) The Louse. 3rd. Edition. Arnold, London.Google Scholar
Gratz, N. G. (1977a) Epidemiology of louse infestations. In Scabies and Pediculosis (Edited by Orkin, M., Maibach, H. I., Parish, L. C. and Schwartzman, R. M.) pp. 157–167. Lippincott, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Gratz, N. G. (1977b) Treatment resistance in louse control, In Scabies and Pediculosis (Edited by Orkin, M., Maibach, H. I., Parish, L. C. and Schwartzman, R. M.), pp. 179–190.Google Scholar
Maunder, J. W. (1971) Use of malathion in the treatment of lousy children. Community Med. 126, 148–150.Google Scholar
Mumcuoglu, K. Y. (1988) Head lice in Israel (in Hebrew). The Family Physician 15, 350–357.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, J. E. (1984) Pediculosis and the pediatrician. Pediatr. Dermatol. 2, 74–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sasaki, N. and Cortez, J. R. B. (1985) Clinical evaluation of the use of decamethrin in the treatment of pediculosis of the scalp (in Portuguese). Rev. Saude Publ. 19, 300–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taplin, D. and Meinking, T. L. (1987) Py rethrins and pyrethroids for the treatment of scabies and pediculosis. Semin. Dermatol. 6, 125–135.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1981) Instructions for Determining the Susceptibility or Resistance of Body Lice and Head Lice to Insecticides. WHO/VBC/81.808.Google Scholar