Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:40:04.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biocontrol potential of the lynx spider Oxyopes javanus (Araneae: Oxyopidae) against the tea mosquito bug, Helopeltis theivora (Heteroptera: Miridae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2014

Kumar Basnet  and
Ananda Mukhopadhyay
Kumar Basnet
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of North Bengal, Post Office North Bengal University, District - Darjeeling, West Bengal734 013, India
Ananda Mukhopadhyay*
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of North Bengal, Post Office North Bengal University, District - Darjeeling, West Bengal734 013, India
*
*E-mail: entoananda@gmail.com, am_nbu@yahoo.co.in
Get access

Abstract

The tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze) industry is the backbone of the agroeconomy of the North Bengal region located at the foothills of the Himalayas in North-East (NE) India. This region accounts for about 25% of the total tea production in India. The tea mosquito bug, Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse, is one of the most devastating sucking pests of tea in this region. Various kinds of synthetic insecticides are continuously sprayed to control this bug. The lynx spider Oxyopes javanus Thorell has been found to remain associated with tea plants and feed on H. theivora. The present study investigated the predation potential and efficacy of the O. javanus spider against one of its most common prey species, H. theivora. In the laboratory, with an increase in H. theivora density, the predation rate of both male and female O. javanus increased. Per capita predation rates exhibited by male and female O. javanus per day against adult H. theivora were 3.67 ± 1.52 and 11.67 ± 1.53 (mean ± standard deviation), respectively. At a reasonably small prey density, the prey consumption rate was highest, reaching up to 100%, indicating that the spider predator has the potential to eliminate smaller populations of the pest. The predation effectiveness calculated using Holling's disc equation was 6.08 and 356.58 for male and female O. javanus, respectively. The prey handling time was 0.138 day for male O. javanus and 0.012 day for female O. javanus. Female O. javanus exhibited about fivefold higher searching efficacy than male O. javanus. It appears that the conservation or augmentation of O. javanus in the tea ecosystem can provide effective biological management of the major tea pest, H. theivora, in sub-Himalayan foothills and plains of NE India.

Keywords

biocontroltea pestHelopeltis theivorafunctional responseaggregative responseOxyopes javanuspredation potential
Type
Research Papers
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 232 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhutia, D., Rai, B. K. and Pal, J. (2013) Detection of multiple cytochrome P450 in hepatic tissue of Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch) exposed to cypermethrin. Proceedings of the Zoological Society 66, 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishnu, A., Chakrabarti, K., Chakraborty, A. and Saha, T. (2009) Pesticide residue level in tea ecosystems of hill and Dooars regions of West Bengal, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 149, 457–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bora, S., Sarmah, M., Rahaman, A. and Gurusubramanian, G. (2007) Relative toxicity of pyrethroid and non-pyrethroid insecticides against male and female tea mosquito bug, Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse (Darjeeling strain). Journal of Entomological Research 31, 37–41.Google Scholar
Carter, P. E. and Rypstra, A. L. (1995) Top-down effects in soybean agroecosystems: spider density affects herbivore damage. Oikos 72, 433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, W. W. (ed.) (1987) Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences (Probability & Mathematical Statistics). 4th edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York; Chichester. 752 pp.Google Scholar
Das, S., Roy, S. and Mukhopadhyay, A. (2010) Diversity of arthropod natural enemies in the tea plantations of North Bengal with emphasis on their association with tea pests. Current Science (Bangalore) 99, 1457–1463.Google Scholar
Das, S., Sarker, M. and Mukhopadhyay, A. (2005) Changing diversity of hymenopteran parasitoids from organically and conventionally managed tea-ecosystem of North Bengal, India. Journal of Environmental Biology 26, 505–509.Google ScholarPubMed
Fagan, W. F. and Hurd, L. E. (1991) Direct and indirect effects of generalist predators on a terrestrial arthropod community. American Midland Naturalist 126, 380–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givens, R. P. (1978) Dimorphic foraging strategies of a salticid spider (Phidippus audax). Ecology 59, 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstone, M. H. (1999) Spider predation: how and why we study it. Journal of Arachnology 27, 333–342.Google Scholar
Gurr, G. M., Barlow, N. D., Memmot, J., Wratten, S. D. and Greathead, D. J. (2000) A history of methodological, theoretical and empirical approaches to biological control, pp. 3–38. In Biological Control: Measures of Success (edited by Gurr, G. and Wratten, S.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurusubramanian, G., Rahman, A., Sarmah, M., Ray, S. and Bora, S. (2008) Pesticide usage pattern in tea ecosystem, their retrospects and alternative measures. Journal of Environmental Biology 29, 813–826.Google ScholarPubMed
Hoefler, C. D., Chen, A. and Jakob, E. M. (2006) The potential of a jumping spider, Phidippus clarus, as a biocontrol agent. Journal of Economic Entomology 99, 432–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holland, J. M., Winder, L. and Perry, J. N. (2000) The impact of dimethoate on the spatial distribution of beneficial arthropods in winter wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 136, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. (1959) The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. The Canadian Entomologist 91, 293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. (1965) The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 97 (Suppl. S45), 5–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komagata, O., Kasai, S. and Tomita, T. (2010) Overexpression of cytochrome P450 genes in pyrethroid-resistant Culex quinquefasciatus . Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 40, 146–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marc, P., Canard, A. and Ysnel, F. (1999) Spiders (Araneae) useful for pest limitation and bioindication. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 74, 229–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, S. D. and Rypstra, A. L. (1999) Spider competition in a structurally simple ecosystem. Journal of Arachnology 27, 343–350.Google Scholar
Morin, P. J. (2011) Community Ecology, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, Massachusetts. 424 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukhopadhyay, A. and Roy, S. (2009) Changing dimensions of IPM in the tea plantations of the North Eastern sub Himalayan region, pp. 290–302. In Proceedings of the National Symposium on IPM Strategies to Combat Emerging Pests in the Current Scenario of Climate Change (edited by Ramamurthy, V. V., Gupta, G. P. and Puri, S. N.). Entomology Society of India, New Delhi and Central Agricultural University, Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh.Google Scholar
Muraleedharan, N. (2007) Tea insects: ecology and control, pp. 672–764. In Encyclopaedia of Pest Management, 2nd edn. (edited by Pimentel, D.). CRC Press, London.Google Scholar
Nyffeler, M. and Sunderland, K. D. (2003) Composition, abundance and pest control potential of spider communities in agroecosystems: a comparison of European and US studies. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 95, 579–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyffeler, M., Sterling, W. L. and Dean, D. A. (1994) How spiders make a living. Environmental Entomology 23, 1357–1367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oraze, M. J. and Grigarick, A. A. (1989) Biological control of aster leafhopper (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) and midges (Diptera: Chironomidae) by Pardosa ramulosa (Araneae: Lycosidae) in California rice fields. Journal of Economic Entomology 82, 745–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedigo, L. P. (2002) Entomology and Pest Management, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. 608 pp.Google Scholar
Rattan, P. S. (1992) Pest and disease control in Africa, pp. 331–352. In Tea: Cultivation to Consumption (edited by Wilson, K. C. and Clifford, M. N.). Chapman & Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray Chaudhuri, D. (2011) Assessment of spiders as second order of biocontrol agents in tea ecosystem with special reference to Assam and Dooars of West Bengal, p. 14. In Annual progress report 2010–11. National Tea Research Foundation, Tea Board, B. T. M. Sarani, Kolkata.Google Scholar
Riechert, S. E. and Lawrence, K. (1997) Test for predation effects of single versus multiple species of generalist predators: spiders and their insect prey. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 84, 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riechert, S. E. and Lockley, T. (1984) Spiders as biological control agents. Annual Review of Entomology 29, 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, S., Mukhopadhyay, A. and Gurusubramanian, G. (2010) Development of resistance to endosulphan in populations of the tea mosquito bug Helopeltis theivora (Heteroptera: Miridae) from organic and conventional tea plantations in India. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 30, 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rypstra, A. L. (1995) Spider predators reduce herbivory; both by direct consumption and by altering the foraging behaviour of insect pests. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 76 (Suppl. 3), 383.Google Scholar
Scharf, M. E., Neal, J. J. and Bennett, G. W. (1998) Changes of insecticide resistance levels and detoxification enzymes following insecticide selection in the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 59, 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiller, D. A. (1986) Interspecific competition between spiders and its relevance to biological control by generalist predators. Environmental Entomology 15, 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiling, P. and Cornelissen, T. (2005) What makes a successful biocontrol agent? A meta-analysis of biological control agent performance. Biological Control 34, 236–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunderland, K. (1999) Mechanisms underlying the effects of spiders on pest populations. Journal of Arachnology 27, 308–316.Google Scholar
Symondson, W. O., Sunderland, K. D. and Greenstone, M. H. (2002) Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents? Annual Review of Entomology 47, 561–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, K., Endo, S. and Kazano, H. (2000) Toxicity of insecticides to predators of rice planthoppers: spiders, the mirid bug, and the drynid wasp. Applied Entomology and Zoology 35, 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hook, R. I. Jr. (1971) Energy and nutrient dynamics of spider and orthopteran populations in a grassland ecosystem. Ecological Monographs 41, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, S. E. and Rypstra, A. L. (2002) Sexual dimorphism in tropic morphology and feeding behavior of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) as a result of differences in reproductive roles. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80, 679–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, D. H. and Chen, B. (1999) Impact of intraguild predators on survival of a forest-floor wolf spider. Oecologia 121, 129–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yardim, E. N. and Edwards, C. A. (1998) The influence of chemical management of pests, diseases and weeds on pest and predatory arthropods associated with tomatoes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 70, 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar