Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:13:44.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemoreception of adult stem-borers: tarsal and ovipositor sensilla on Chilo partellus and Eldana saccharina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

S. M. Waladde
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

Preliminary electrophysiological tests on certain tarsal and ovipositor sensilla of stem-borers, Chilo partellus and Eldana saccharina, show that the sensilla are innervated by mechano- and contact chemoreceptor cells. Tarsal receptors are sensitive to sucrose, whereas the ovipositor sensilla are not and responses of the ovipositor mechanoreceptor units can be related to the oviposition behaviour of the moths.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, A. L. (1932) The sensitivity of the legs of common butterflies to sugars. J. exp. Zool. 63, 235259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, R. L. and Schuster, D. J. (1981) Oviposition stimulant for tomato pinworms from surface of tomato plants. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 74, 512515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadha, G. K. and Roome, R. E. (1980) Oviposition behaviour and the sensilla of the ovipositor of Chilo partellus and Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Zool. Lond. 192, 169178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dethier, V. G. (1971) A surfeit of stimuli: a paucity of receptors. Am. Sclent. 59, 70715.Google Scholar
Dethier, V. G. and Hanson, F. E. (1968) Electrophysiological responses of the chemoreceptors of the blowfly to sodium salts of fatty acids. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 60, 12961303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frings, H. and Frings, M. (1949) The loci of contact chemoreceptors in insects. Am. Midi. Natur. 41, 602658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frings, H. and Frings, M. (1956) The loci of contact chemoreceptors involved in feeding reactions of certain Lepidoptera. Biol. Bull. 110, 291299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, E. S. (1958) Electrophysiological studies of arthropod chemoreception—III. Chemoreceptors of terrestrial and fresh water arthropods. Biol. Bull. 115, 114125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, E. S., Lettvin, J. Y. and Roeder, K. D. (1955) Physiology of a primary chemoreceptor unit. Science, N.Y. 122, 417418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, W. C. and Schoonhoven, L. M. (1973) Tarsal contact chemosensory hairs of the large white butterfly Pieris brassicae and their possible role in oviposition behaviour. Ent. exp. appl. 16, 343357.Google Scholar
Morita, H., Doira, S., Takeda, K. and Kuwabara, M. (1957) Electrical responses of contact chemoreceptors on the tarsus of the butterfly Vanessa indica. Mem. Fac. Kyushu Univ., series E (Biology) 2, 119–139.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, B. F., Beevor, P. S., Hall, D. R., Lester, R., Davies, J. C. and Seshu Reddy, K. V. (1979) Components of the sex pheromone of the female spotted stalk-borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): identification and preliminary field trials. J. chem. Ecol. 5, 149159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Städler, E. and Seabrook, W. D. (1975) Chemoreceptors on the proboscis of the female Eastern spruce budworm: electrophysiological study. Ent. exp. appl. 18, 153160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takeda, K. (1961) The nature of impulses of single tarsal chemoreceptors in the butterfly Vanessa indica. J. cell, comp. Physiol. 58, 233245.Google ScholarPubMed
Yamaoka, K. and Hirao, T. (1973) Releasing signals of oviposition behaviour in Bombyx mori (Lep., Bombycidae). J. Insect Physiol. 19, 22152223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaoka, K., Hoshiwo, M. and Hirao, T. (1971) Role of sensory hairs on the anal papillae in oviposition behaviour of Bombyx mori (Lep., Bombycidae). J. Insect Physiol. 17, 897911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar