Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T10:17:41.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Field infestation and damage to soybean and cowpea by pod-sucking bugs in Benue State, Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

E. O. Ogunwolu
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Production, University of Agriculture, P. M. B. 2373, Makurdi, Nigeria
Get access

Abstract

Soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merril, and cowpea, Vigna unguiculta (L.) Walp., were grown in field plots in 1988 and 1989 to compare infestation and damage by pod-sucking bugs (PSBs). Population of PSB was monitored by counting adults and nymphs on rows two and six of each plot from 5 to 14 weeks after planting. Cowpea was infested mainly by Clavigralla tomentosicollis (Stal.), C. shadabi (Germ.), Mirperus jaculus (Thnb.) and Aspavia armigera F., while soybean was infested by M. jaculus, Anoplocnemis curvipes (F.) and Riptortus dentipes F. Soybean had exceedingly low PSB density, ≺ 1 bug/2 m-row, in 1988 and 1989. Four sprays of 400 g a.i./ha. dimethoate had no significant effect on pod and seed damage, yield and germination, compared to the unsprayed control. In contrast, cowpea attracted high populations of PSBs, 30 and 1 bug/2 m-row, in 1988 and 1989, respectively. Dimethoate sprayed against PSBs on cowpea resulted in two- to four-fold reductions (P < 0.05) in pod and seed damage and yield increases of 1500 kg/ha. (P < 0.05) in 1988 and 300 kg/ha. (P < 0.05) in 1989.

Résumé

La graine de soja, Glycine max (L.) Merril, et le niébé, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp, sont été cultivés dans le terrain de champ en 1988 et en 1989 à fin de comparer le dégât crie par les insectes (punaises) surtout le Clavigralla tomentosicollis (Stal.), C. shadabi (Germ.), Mirperus jaculus (Thnb.) et Aspavia armigera F.

La graine de soja avait la densité PSB excessivement base, 2 punaises/10 m d'une rangée en 1988 et 1 punaise/10 m d'une rangée en 1988 et 1 punaise/10 m d'une rangée en 1989, contre lequel 400 g a.i./ha. dimethoate pulverisateur avait aucun choc importante, en ce qui concerne la prevention de dégât de la cosse et la graine, et aussi de plus la production et la germination pourcentage de la graine.

Le cowpea au contraire avait attiré la population de PSB très haute; 152 punaises et 4 punaises/10 m d'une rangée en 1988 et 1989 respectivement. Le pulvérisateur de dimethoate contre PSB sur le niébé a resulte en 2–4 pilé reduction (P < 0.05) dans le dégât de la cosse et la graine et aussi dans la production de 1.5 t/ha (P < 0.05) en 1988 et 03 t/ha (P > 0.05) en 1989.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Booker, R. H. (1965) Pests of cowpea and their control in Northern Nigeria. Bull. Entomol. Res. 25, 63672.Google Scholar
Ezueh, M. I. and Dina, S. O. (1979) Pest problems of soybeans and control in Nigeria. In Proc. World Soybean Res. (Edited by Corbin Fredrick, T.), No. II, pp. 275283.Google Scholar
Jackai, L. E. N. and Kueneman, E. A. (1982) Survey of the major pests of soybeans at two locations in Nigeria. In Proc. II Natl. Meeting of Nigerian Soybean Scientists (Edited by Emechebe, A. M., Pal, U. R. and Olufajo, O. O.), Pub. No. II, 142149.Google Scholar
Jackai, L. E. N. and Daoust, R. A. (1986) Insect pests of cowpeas. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 31, 95119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackai, L. E. N., Dashiell, K. E. and Bello, L. L. (1988) Evaluation of soybean genotypes fof field resistance to stink bugs in Nigeria. Crop Protection 7, 4854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackai, L. E. N., Atropo, P. K. and Odebiyi, J. A. (1989) The response of two growth stages of cowpea to different population densities of the coreid bug, Clavigralla tomentosicollis (Stal.) to determine action threshold levels. Crop Protection 8, 422428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, T. and Cosenza, G. W. (1987) Integrated control of soybean stink bugs in the Cerrados. Jarq 20, 229236. (Abstracton Tropical Agric. 13, No. 62112).Google Scholar
Libby, J. L. (1968) Insect pests of Nigerian crops. University of Wisconsin Res. Bull. No. 269.Google Scholar
Ogun, F. G. (1987) Impact of insecticide application at various soybean growth stages on insect pest abundance, crop damage and yield. Project Report. University of Jos, Makurdi Campus, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Ogunwolu, E. O. and Ogun, F. G. (1987) Yield effects of insect infestation at different stages of soybean growth in Benue State. In Proc. VIINatl. Meeting of Nigerian Soybean Scientists (Edited by Oyekan, P.O. and Olufajo, O. O.), Publ. No. VII, 91101.Google Scholar
Raheja, A. K. (1976) Assessment of losses caused by insect pests to cowpea in Northern Nigeria. PANS 22, 229233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schalk, J. M. and Fery, R. L. (1982) Southern green stink bug and leaf-footed bug: Effect on cowpea production. J. Econ. Entomol. 75, 7275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S. R. and Jackai, L. E. N. (1985) Insect pests of cowpea in Africa: Their life cycle, economic importance and potential for control. In Cowpea Research Production and Utilization (Edited by Singh, S. R. and Rachie, K. O.), pp. 217231. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. (1960) Principles and Procedures of Statistics with Special Reference to the Biological Sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Todd, J. W. and Turnipseed, S. G. (1974) Effect of southern stink bug damage on yield and quality of soybeans. J. Econ. Entomol. 67, 421426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar