Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:07:16.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The gum leaf skeletonizer, Uraba lugens, and its hosts: Possible selection of strains of insects that are able to feed on resistant trees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

J. R. Cobbinah
Affiliation:
Forest Products Research Institute, Kumasi, Ghana
Get access

Abstract

The marked differences in the suitability of different Eucalyptus spp. for growth of the larvae of Uraba lugens was further investigated. It is suggested that non-iarval food-plants and poor larval food-plants regularly selected as ‘egg hosts’ may provide a substrate for the development of resistant strains or biotypes assuming the occurrence of matings between individuals that survive and genetic basis for survival in such difficult food-plants.

Résumé

Les différences marquées d'être propice des essences Eucalyptus differents pour la croissance des larves de Uraba lugens ont été etudiés. Il est suggéré que les aliments vegétaux non-larvaires et les mauvais aliments vegetaux larvaires selectionnés habituellement comme des hôtes des oeufs, doivent faire provision pour une couche pour la developpment des lignees resistantes ou biotype en supposant l'occurrence des accouplements, entre les individus qui survivent et la base genetique pour la survivance dans tels aliments vegetaux difficiles.

Type
Section II: Factors influencing the expression and stability of host plant resistance
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beck, S. D. (1974) Theoretical aspect of host-plant specificity in insects. In Proc. Summer Inst. Conf. Plants and Insects (Edited by Maxwell, F. G. and Harris, H. A.), pp. 291311. Mississippi University Press, Mississippi.Google Scholar
Brown, J. F. (1980) The genetics of resistance in plants to infection by pathogens. In A Course Manual in Plant Protection (Edited by Brown, J. F.), pp. 267275. Hedges & Bell, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Cobbinah, J. R. (1983) Suitability of various eucalypts for growth of the larvae of Uraba lugens (Walk). For. Ecol. Manage. 6, 361366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, A. (1847) The hessian fly, its history, character. transformations and habits. Trans. N. Y. agric. Soc. 6, 1213.Google Scholar
Harris, J. A. (1974) The gum leaf skeletonizer, Uraba lugens. For Tech., paper 21. Forest Commission, Victoria.Google Scholar
Hatchett, J. H. and Gallum, R. L. (1970) Genetics of the ability of the hessian fly, Mayetiola destructor, to survive on wheats having different genes for resistance. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63, 14001407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, L. A. S. (1972) Evolution and classification of Eucalyptus. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 97, 1153.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. F. and Cobbinah, J. R. (1977) The oviposition and establishment of the gum leaf skeletoniser, Uraba lugens (Walk). Aust. For. 40, 4455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Painter, R. H. (1951) Insect Resistance in Crop Plants. Macmillan, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stackman, E. C. and Levin, M. N. (1922) The determination of biologic forms of Puccinia graminis on Triticum spp. Minnesota agric. exp. St Bull. 8, 110.Google Scholar
Sutherland, O. R. W. (1976) A chemical basis for plant resistance to grass grub and black beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Proc. N.Z. Grassld Ass. 37, 126131.Google Scholar
Wallof, N. and Blackith, R. E. (1962) The growth and distribution of mounds of Lasius flavus (Fabricius Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Silwood Park, Berkshire. J. Anim. Ecol. 31, 421437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellington, W. G. (1957) Individual difference as a factor in population dynamics. The development of a problem. Can. J. Zool. 35, 293323.Google Scholar
Wellington, W. G. (1959) Individual differences in larvae and egg masses of the Western tent caterpillar. Can. Dept. Agric. For. Biol. Div. Bimonthly Prog. Rept 15(6).Google Scholar
Wiklund, C. (1975) The evolutionary relationship between adult oviposition preferences and larval host plant range in Papilio machaon L. Oecologia, Berl. 18, 185197.Google Scholar