Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:11:25.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Four Plant Growth Regulators on Development of the Melon Fruit Fly, Bactrocera Cucurbitae (Coquillett)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Rabinder Kaur  and
P. J. Rup
Rabinder Kaur
Affiliation:
Insect Physiology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar-143 005, India
P. J. Rup*
Affiliation:
Insect Physiology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar-143 005, India
*
Corresponding author: PJR. E-mail: pushp@angelfire.com
Get access

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to assess the effect of four plant growth regulators (PGRs), namely coumarin, kinetin, gibberellic acid (GA3) and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), on the development of the melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae). All four compounds exerted growth-and development-inhibitory effects on the fly. Coumarin was most potent, followed by kinetin, GA3 and IAA. The first and second instars of the fly were more sensitive than the third instar. Treatment with the PGRs also prolonged the fly's developmental period, reduced percentage emergence and increased percentage of abnormal flies emerging. At the higher concentrations tested (125, 625 and 3125 µg/ml) coumarin, kinetin and GA3 caused 100% mortality in first instars.

Résumé

Des expérimentations ont été conduites pour évaluer les effets de 4 régulateurs de croissance de plante (RCP), la coumarine, la kinétine, l'acide gibbérélique (AG) et l'acide indole-3-acétique (AIA), sur le développement de la mouche du melon, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Les 4 composés ont des effets inhibiteurs sur la croissance et le développement de la mouche. La coumarine est peu active, suivie de la kinétine, de l'AG et de l'AIA. Les premiers et seconds stades de la mouche sont plus sensibles que le troisième stade. Le traitement avec les RCP prolonge également la période de développement de la mouche, réduit le pourcentage d'émergence et augmente le pourcentage de mouches adultes anormales. Aux plus fortes concentrations utilisées (125, 625 et 3125 µg/ml) la coumarine, la kinétine et l'AG sont responsables de 100% de mortalité au premier stade.

Keywords

Bactrocera cucurbitaedevelopmentcoumaringibberellic acidindole-3-acetic acidkinetinBactrocera cucurbitaedéveloppementcoumarineacide gibbéréliqueacide indole-3-acétiquekinétine
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 2003 , pp. 121 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alonso, C. (1971) The effects of gibberellic acid upon developmental processes in Drosophila hydei. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 14, 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenbaum, M.R., Nitao, J.K. and Zangerl, A. R. (1991) Adaptive significance of furanocoumarin diversity in Pastinacea sativa (Apiaceae). J. Chem. Ecol. 17, 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhathal, S. S. and Singh, D. (1994) Evaluation of plant extracts and related products for biological activity against the mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach). Pest Manage. Econ. Zool. 2, 53–57.Google Scholar
Brattsten, L.B., Evans, C.K., Bonetti, S. and Zalkow, L.H. (1984) Induction by carrot allelochemicals of insecticide metabolizing enzymes in the southern armyworm (Spodoptera eridania). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 77C, 29–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Bur, M. (1985) Influence of plant growth hormones on development and reproduction of aphids (Homoptera: Aphidinea: Aphididae). Entomol. Gener. 10, 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhaliwal, G.S. and Opender, K. (2001) Biopesticides: A global perspective, p. 716. In Proceedings of the Biopesticide Conference, Biopesticides: Emerging Trends. 7–9 February 2001, Chandigarh, India (Edited by Opender, K., Dhaliwal, G.S., Marwaha, S.S. and Arora, J.K.). Insect Biopesticide Research Centre, Jalandhar, India.Google Scholar
Greany, P.D. (1989) Host plant resistance to tephritids: An underexploited control strategy, pp. 353–362. In World Crop Pests, Vol. 3A: Fruit Flies—Biology, Natural Enemies and Control (Edited by Robinson, A. S. and Hooper, G.). Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Gupta, J.N., Verma, A.N. and Kashyap, R. K. (1978) An improved method for mass rearing of melon fruit fly Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett. Indian J. Entomol. 40, 470–471.Google Scholar
Honeyborne, C.H.B. (1969) Performance of Aphis fabae and Brevicoryne brassicae on plants treated with growth regulators. J. Sci. Food Agric. 20, 388–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamada, M. and Ito, S. (1984) Growth promoting effect of plant hormones on silkworm. J. Agric. Chem. Soc. Japan 58, 779–784.Google Scholar
Magadum, S.B. and Hooli, M.A. (1989) Effect of indole-3-acetic acid on the polyvoltine silkworm, the pure Mysore breed of Bombyx mori L. Sericologia 29, 507–517.Google Scholar
Mansour, M.H. (1981) Efficiency of two allelochemics on the conversion of ingested and digested food into the body tissues of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Z. Angew. Entomol. 92, 493–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, J. L. and Robinson, F. A. (1966) Gibberellic acid: Effects of feeding in an artificial diet for honeybees. Science 152, 1765–1766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neale, M. (2000) The regulation of natural products as crop protection agents. Pest Manage. Sci. 56, 677–680.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattan, S.I.S. and Clark, B.F.C. (1994) Kinetin delays the onset of ageing characteristics in human fibroblasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 201, 665–672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Remadevi, O.K., Magadum, S.B., Nair, K.S. and Datta, R.K. (1998) Plant growth hormones and silk. Indian Text. J. 108, 78–80.Google Scholar
Roseland, C.R. and Grosz, T.J. (1997) Induced responses of common annual sunflower Helianthus annuus L. from geographically diverse populations and deterrence of feeding by sunflower beetle. J. Chem. Ecol. 23, 517–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rup, P.J. and Dhillon, M.K. (1999) Morphogenetic and biochemical responses of the mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) (Homoptera: Aphididae) to indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). J. Aphidol. 13, 31–38.Google Scholar
Rup, P.J. and Kalia, S. (1993) Effect of gibberellic acid on the development of banana fruit fly, Zaprionus paravittiger (Godbole and Vaidya) (Drosophilidae: Diptera). Pest Manage. Econ. Zool. 1, 27–31.Google Scholar
Rup, P.J., Kaur, P. and Sohal, S. K. (1998) Influence of coumarin (a secondary plant compound) on the morphology and biochemistry of the mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.). J. Environ. Biol. 19, 251–257.Google Scholar
Rup, P.J., Kumari, S. and Sohal, S. K. (1997) Morphogenetic responses of Zaprionus paravittiger to indole acetic acid, pp. 289–293. In Environment and Development (Edited by Grover, I.S. and Thukral, A. S.). Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, India.Google Scholar
Sammour, E.A. and Abdalla, E.F. (1991) Acute and delayed effects of teflubenzuron, S-21149 and coumarin on the American bollworm, Heliothis armigera (Hubn.). Bull. Entomol. Soc. Egypt, Econ. Ser. 17, 111–119.Google Scholar
Scheurer, S. (1976) The influence of phytohormones and growth regulating substances on insect development processes. Symp. Biol. Hung. 16, 255–259.Google Scholar
Schooley, D.A., Judy, K. J., Bergot, B. J., Hall, M. S. and Jennings, R.C. (1976) Determination of the physiological levels of juvenile hormones in several insects and biosynthesis of the carbon skeletons of the juvenile hormones, pp. 101–117. In The Juvenile Hormones (Edited by Gilbert, L. I.). Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shantakumari, M., Sreedhara, V.M. and Fletcher, R.A. (1989) Gibberellic acid improves the commercial characteristics of silkworm. Sericologia 29, 347–351.Google Scholar
Sharma, S. P., Kaur, P. and Rattan, S. I. S. (1995) Plant growth hormone kinetin delays ageing, prolongs the life-span and slows down development of the fruit fly, Zaprionus paravittiger. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 216, 1067–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srivastava, B.G. (1975) A chemically defined diet for Dacus cucurbitae (Coq.) larvae under aseptic conditions. Entomol. News Lett. 5, 24.Google Scholar
Visscher, S.N. (1980) Regulation of grasshopper fecundity, longevity and egg viability by plant growth hormones. Experientia 36, 130–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R.J. (1972) Plant Growth Substances in Agriculture. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
Yesilada, E. and Bozcuk, A. N. (1996) The effects of ABA and kinetin on the developmental period of Drosophila melanogaster. Turkish J. Biol. 20, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar