Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 March 2013
The 1980s and 1990s were decades of great creativity in Indian labor history. The study of labor moved from a long-standing institutional focus on trade unions to a study of workers themselves, as well as from the economism and determinism that had characterized many previous writings. A growing interest in labor led to the first conference devoted to Indian labor history at the International Institute of Social History in Amsterdam in 1995 and the founding of the Association of Indian Labour Historians the following year. The dynamism and the new intellectual horizons of Indian labor history in that period are captured in the work of three major historians: Dipesh Chakrabarty, Rajnarayan Chandavarkar, and Chitra Joshi. For the purposes of this essay, there is no need to review their contributions in detail (not least because such overviews may be found elsewhere), but it is nevertheless essential to provide a quick sketch of the arguments of each.
1. Rethinking Working Class History: Bengal 1890–1940 (Princeton, 1989)Google Scholar; “Conditions for Knowledge of Working-Class Conditions: Employers, Government and the Jute Workers of Calcutta, 1890–1940,” in Subaltern Studies II: Writings on South Asian History and Society, ed. Guha, Ranajit (Delhi, 1983)Google Scholar; “Trade Unions in a Hierarchical Culture: The Jute Workers of Calcutta, 1920–50,” in Subaltern Studies III: Writings on South Asian History and Society, ed. Guha, Ranajit (Delhi, 1984)Google Scholar.
2. The Origins of Industrial Capitalism in India: Business Strategies and the Working Classes in Bombay, 1900–1940 (Cambridge, 1994)Google Scholar; “Workers' Politics and the Mill Districts in Bombay between the Wars,” Modern Asian Studies 15 (1981), 603–647 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “Industrialization in India before 1947: Conventional Approaches and Alternative Perspectives,” Modern Asian Studies 19 (1985), 623–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3. Lost Worlds: Indian Labour and its Forgotten Histories (New Delhi, 2003)Google Scholar; “Kanpur Textile Labour: Some Structural Features of Formative Years,” Economic and Political Weekly, xvi (1981), 1823–28Google Scholar; “Bonds of Community, Ties of Religion: Kanpur Textile Workers in the Early Twentieth Century,” Indian Economic and Social History Review 22 (1985), 251–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4. van der Linden, Marcel and Mohapatra, Prabhu P., eds, Labour Matters: Towards Global Histories, Studies in Honour of Sabyasachi Bhattacharya (New Delhi, 2009)Google Scholar.
5. International Review of Social History, vol. 51, Supplement S14 (2006)Google Scholar.
6. Breman, Jan, Patronage and Exploitation: Changing Agrarian Relations in South Gujarat, India (Berkeley, CA, 1974)Google Scholar.
7. See, for example, Tinker, Hugh, A New System of Slavery: The Export of Indian Labour Overseas, 1830–1920 (London, 1974)Google Scholar.
8. Some of these themes are explored in my Transition to a Colonial Economy: Weavers, Merchants and Kings in South India, 1720–1800 (Cambridge, 2001)Google Scholar.
9. Contrast, for example, Parthasarathi, Transition to a Colonial Economy with Ahuja, Ravi, “Labour Relations in Early Colonial India, Madras 1750–1800,” Modern Asian Studies, 37 (2002).Google Scholar
10. Chandavarkar, Origins of Industrial Capitalism, chap. 4; Joshi, Lost Worlds, 135–136.
11. Parthasarathi, Transition to a Colonial Economy, chaps. 1 and 4.
12. Joshi, Lost Worlds, 183.
13. Chandavarkar, Origins of Industrial Capitalism, 100.
14. Parthasarathi, Transition to a Colonial Economy, 56–61.
15. Banerjee, Nirmala, “Working Women in Colonial Bengal: Modernization and Marginalization,” in Recasting Women: Essays in Indian Colonial History ed. Sangari, Kumkum and Vaid, Sudesh (New Brunswick, 1990)Google Scholar.
16. Joshi, Lost Worlds, chap. 3.
17. Sen, Contrast Samita, Women and Labour in Late Colonial India: The Bengal Jute Industry (Cambridge, 1999), 133–41Google Scholar; Joshi, Lost Worlds, 87.
18. Sen, Samita, “Offences Against Marriage: Negotiating Custom in Colonial Bengal,” in A Question of Silence? The Sexual Economies of Modern India, ed. John, Mary E. and Nair, Janaki (New Delhi, 1998), 105Google Scholar.
19. Mohapatra, Prabhu P., “Regulated Informality: Legal Constructions of Labour Relations in Colonial India 1814–1926,” in Workers in the Informal Sector: Studies in Labour History 1800–2000, ed. Bhattacharya, Sabyashachi and Lucassen, Jan (Delhi, 2005)Google Scholar.
20. Anderson, Michael, “India, 1858–1930: The Illusion of Free Labor,” in Masters, Servants, and Magistrates in Britain and the Empire, 1562–1955, ed. Hay, Douglas and Craven, Paul (Chapel Hill, NC, 2004), 422Google Scholar.
21. Aditya Sarkar, “The Work of Law: Three Factory Narratives from Bombay Presidency, 1881–1884,” in Labour Matters.
22. See, for example, Papers Relating to the Introduction of a New Mode of Settlement of the Land Revenue for the District of Tanjore (no place or date of publication available), consulted in the Tamil Nadu State Archives, Chennai.
23. Chowdhury, Subhanil, “Employment in India: What Does the Latest Data Show?” Economic and Political Weekly, xlvi, 32 (2011), 23Google Scholar; also see Himanshu, “Employment Trends in India: A Re-examination,” Economic and Political Weekly, xlvi, 37 (2011), 43–59 Google Scholar.
24. Mazumdar, Indrani, “Women's Unpaid Labour in Neo-Liberal India,” Indian Historical Review, 35 (2008), 77–97 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chowdhury, “Employment in India,” 24.
25. Ghosh, Jayati, “The Macroeconomic Context of Rising Domestic Work,” Labour File, 8, 3 (2010), 16–18 Google Scholar.
26. Sivakumar, Sowmya, “A Political Agenda to Minimise Wages,” Economic and Political Weekly, xlv, 50 (2010), 10–12 Google Scholar.
27. Vijayabaskar, M., “Global Crises, Welfare Provision and Coping Strategies of Labour in Tiruppur,” Economic and Political Weekly, xlvi, 22 (2011), 38–45 Google Scholar.
28. “Workers Struggles at Maruti,” Economic and Political Weekly, xlvi, 37 (2011), 7–8 Google Scholar.