Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T19:34:15.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Albert and Le Compte Case

European Court of Human Rights.  28 May 1982 ; 10 February 1983 ; 24 October 1983 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

State responsibility — Nature and kinds of — For breaches of treaty obligations — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Right to a fair and public trial in proceedings relating to the determination of civil rights or of a criminal charge — Article 6(1) — Proceedings before disciplinary bodies of professional association — Imposition of sanctions — Whether within ambit of Article 6(1) — Prohibition of inhuman or degrading punishment — Object of sanctions — Whether State party in breach of guarantees of fair trial and freedom of association — Article 50 — Just satisfaction

State responsibility — Damages (Measure of damages) — Grounds for awarding damages — Non — pecuniary damages — Causal links between established violation and alleged damage — Legal fees — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950

Disputes — Other international courts — European Court of Human Rights — Relinquishment of jurisdiction of Chamber in favour of plenary Court — Whether case raises serious questions affecting interpretation of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950

The individual in international law — In general — Human rights and freedoms — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, Article 6(1) — Right to a fair and public trial in proceedings relating to determination of civil rights or of a criminal charge — Proceedings before disciplinary bodies of professional association — Imposition of sanctions — Whether within ambit of Article 6(1) — Existence of a dispute (contestation) — Direct relationship between dispute and a right — Nature of the right — Whether a civil right — Impartiality of tribunal — Whether providing for public hearings and public pronouncements of decisions — Prohibition of inhuman or degrading punishment — Article 3 — Object of sanctions — Guarantees of fair trial — Article 6(2) and (3) (a), (b) and (d) — Freedom of association — Article 11 — European Court of Human Rights — Relinquishment of jurisdiction of Chamber in favour of plenary Court — Whether case raises serious questions affecting interpretation of Convention

Article 50 — Breach of right to public trial established — Just satisfaction — Non-pecuniary damage — Whether earlier judgment furnished reparation — Competence to direct State party to annul disciplinary sanctions and criminal sentences — Causal links between established violation and alleged damage — Reimbursement of legal costs

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)