Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T09:06:56.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Iran-United States, Case No. A/18

Iran-United States Claims Tribunal.  06 April 1984 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Claims — Nationality of claims — Dual nationals — Claimant possessing nationality of the respondent State — Whether claim against respondent State precluded by claimant’s nationality — Theory of dominant and effective nationality — Hague Convention Concerning Certain Questions regarding the Conflict of Nationality Laws, 1930, Articles 4 and 5 — Iran-United States Claims Tribunal — Whether possessing jurisdiction over claims by persons having nationality of Iran and the United States — Iran-United States Claims Settlement Declaration, 1981, Articles II and VII

International tribunals — Iran-United States Claims Tribunal — Nature and function of Tribunal — Whether inter-State tribunal — Whether claims brought before Tribunal in exercise of right of diplomatic protection — Direct access of individual to the Tribunal — Whether jurisdiction clause should always be construed narrowly

Nationality — Individuals — Dual nationality — Whether exceptional — Effect in international law — Circumstances in which nationality acquired — Dominant and effective nationality — Criteria for determining which nationality is dominant and effective

Treaties — Interpretation — Iran-United States Claims Settlement Declaration, 1981 — Principles of interpretation — Reference to general international law as aid to interpretation — Whether necessary to demonstrate “converging will” of parties to treaty to establish a particular interpretation — Whether jurisdiction clause to be construed narrowly

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Municipal law concepts in international law — Nationality and citizenship — Effect in international law — The law and practice of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)