Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:53:39.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Öcalan v. Turkey (No 2)

European Court of Human Rights.  18 March 2014 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Human rights — Prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 3 — Whether life sentence irreducible — Whether prospect of release — Whether possibility of review — Whether possibility to reform and rehabilitate — Whether prospect of release if rehabilitation achieved — Whether dedicated mechanism guaranteeing review — Whether periodic reviews thereafter — Vinter v. United Kingdom — Whether finding of violation giving applicant prospect of imminent release — Whether Turkey violating Article 3 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950

Human rights — Prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 3 — Whether applicant’s conditions of detention amounting to inhuman treatment — Solitary confinement — Detention conditions in İmralı prison prior to 17 November 2009 — Detention conditions in İmralı prison after 17 November 2009 — Whether detention conditions attaining severity threshold to constitute inhuman treatment — Whether Turkey violating Article 3 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950

Human rights — Right to respect for private and family life — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 8 — Restrictions on visits by and communication with family members — Whether in accordance with law — Whether pursuing legitimate aims — Whether necessary in a democratic society — Whether Turkey violating Article 8 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950

Human rights — No punishment without law — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 7 — Whether applicant convicted and sentenced under law applicable at material time — Whether death penalty imposed on applicant equivalent from outset to maximum thirty-six-year prison sentence — Whether any law providing applicant with possibility of release on parole after minimum period of incarceration — Social isolation — Whether Turkey violating Article 7 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950

Treaties — Interpretation — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Articles 3, 7 and 8 of European Convention — Article 3 of European Convention prohibiting inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment — Whether imposition of life sentence without possibility of release on parole violating Article 3 of European Convention — Whether life sentence irreducible — Whether prospect of release — Whether possibility of review — International jurisprudence — When any incompatibility with Article 3 arising — Whether finding of violation giving applicant prospect of imminent release

Terrorism — Threat from terrorism — Relevance — Applicant convicted of terrorism charges in Turkey — Article 3 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment in absolute terms — Applicability of Article 3 in fight against terrorism – Applicant’s conduct — Relevance — Conditions of detention — Irreducibility of life sentence

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)