Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:03:48.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sapphire International Petroleums Ltd. v. National Iranian Oil Company.

Commission of Enquiry (Denmark-United Kingdom).  15 March 1963 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

International Law — Sources — General principles of law — Meaning and content — Distinguished from equity — Application as law governing concession agreement between State corporation and foreign company — Respect for acquired rights as general principle of law — Pacta sunt servanda — Compensation for breach of concession — Damnum emergens and lucrum cessans.

State responsibility — Damages — Measure of — Indirect damages and damages for loss of profits — Breach of concession agreement — Claim for expenses incurred in concluding agreement — Claim for expenses in performing agreement — Compensation for loss of chance to discover oil in concession area — Valuation of right to unworked and unexplored areas — Applicable method of valuation — Expert evidence — Assessment of compensation ex aequo et bono.

State responsibility — Interest — Rate of interest — Direct and indirect damages for breaches of concession agreement — " Usual rate " of interest — Dies a quo.

Arbitration — The law applied by arbitral tribunals — Arbitration under concession agreement between State corporation and foreign company — Procedural law — Right of parties to choose this law — Effect of giving arbitrator power to determine seat of arbitration Competence of arbitrator to select procedural law — Substantive law — Application of general principles of law — Agreement with no express choice of law — Whether private international law of seat of arbitration governs — Relevance of common intention of parties — Applicability of lex loci contractus and lex loci executionis — Special nature of long-term concession agreement with foreign company — Significance of arbitration clause — Whether intention to reject exclusive application of local law implied.

Arbitration — In general — Appointment and withdrawal of arbitrators — Constitution of arbitral tribunal — Initial failure of one party to appoint arbitrator — Request to third party to appoint sole arbitrator — Claim that appointment null — Non-appearance of party making this claim — Validity of appointment of sole arbitrator — Whether this issue res judicata in subsequent arbitration.

Arbitration — Procedure — Procedure before the tribunal — Effect of default and refusal to appear by one party — Whether arbitrator may proceed to determine merits.

State responsibility — For revocation of, or interference with, concessions — Concession agreement between State corporation and foreign company — Undertaking by Government and State corporation not to cancel or amend concession or hinder its performance — Disputes clause — Provision for reference to arbitration — Application of principle pacta sunt servanda — Responsibility of State corporation for fundamental breach of concession — Measure of damages — Direct and indirect damages — Damages for loss of profits.

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)