Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:50:59.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Young, James and Webster Case (Closed Shop Case)

European Court of Human Rights.  13 August 1981 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Treaties — Interpretation — Consideration of preparatory work — Significance of preparatory work — Preparatory work revealing deliberate omission of any express mention of particular freedom — Whether that freedom entirely excluded from treaty — European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 1951

Disputes — Other international courts — European Court of Human Rights — Procedure — Whether court should consider question proprio motu

The individual in international law — Human rights and freedoms — Freedom of association — Trade union closed shop — Employees engaged before introduction of closed shop required to join specified trade unions when closed shop introduced — Employees refusing to join dismissed — No remedy under domestic law — Whether freedom of association includes freedom not to join an association — Whether being compelled to join a trade union contrary to one's convictions violates freedom of thought and expression — Treaties — Interpretation — Preparatory work — Significance of preparatory work — International courts — Procedure — Whether court should examine questions proprio motu — European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 1950

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)