Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T09:50:04.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Due Deference: Cosmopolitan Social Identity and the Psychology of Legal Obligation in International Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2017

A. Burcu Bayram
Get access

Abstract

Why are some politicians guided by a sense of obligation toward international law but others are not? Why do some politicians have a social as opposed to an egoistic preference over compliance with international legal rules? Existing approaches largely assume that the structural features of the compliance environment shape preferences. As a result, they neglect the heterogeneity across decision makers' subjective beliefs in the legitimacy of international law, which is critical for explaining who exhibits a sense of obligation and has a non-egoistic preference for compliance. Drawing upon a large body of psychological research on social identity and influence, I argue that obligation toward international law has a behavioral foundation shaped by cosmopolitan social identity. Using data from an original survey of German politicians that includes two compliance experiments, I show that politicians with a high degree of cosmopolitanism are driven by a sense of legal obligation that results in a social preference for compliance while those low on cosmopolitanism lack the same sense of normative respect. Replicated in a second experimental study conducted with a convenience sample, my results indicate that strategic rationality in compliance applies, but only to a particular set of actors. By illuminating the psychological underpinnings of obligation toward international law, this study contributes to a richer understanding of compliance preferences and builds a bridge between instrumental and normative models.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 71 , Supplement S1 , April 2017 , pp. S137 - S163
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth W., Keohane, Robert, Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie, and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. The Concept of Legalization. International Organization 54 (3):401–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization 54 (3):421–56.Google Scholar
Abrams, Dominic, and Hogg, Michael A.. 1990. Social Identification, Self-Categorization and Social Influence. European Review of Social Psychology 1 (1):195–228.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W., Frenkel-Brunswik, Else, Levinson, Danie J., and Nevitt, Stanford R.. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Akerlof, George A., and Kranton, Rachel E.. 2010. Identity Economics: How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages, and Well-Being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ashmore, Richard D., Deaux, Kay, and McLaughlin-Volpe, Tracy. 2004. An Organizing Framework for Collective Identity: Articulation and Significance of Multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin 130 (1):80–114.Google Scholar
Bandura, Albert. 1991. Social Cognitive Theory of Moral Thought and Action. In Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development, vol. 1, edited by Kurtines, William M. and Gerwirtz, Jacob L., 45–103. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Baumeister, Roy F., and Vohs, Kathleen D.. 2007. Self-Regulation, Ego Depletion, and Motivation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 1 (1):115–28.Google Scholar
Bayram, A. Burcu. 2015. What Drives Modern Diogenes? Individual Values and Cosmopolitan Allegiance. European Journal of International Relations 21 (2):451–79.Google Scholar
Bayram, A. Burcu. 2016a. Good Europeans? How European Identity and Costs Interact to Explain Politician Attitudes Towards Compliance with European Union Law. Journal of European Public Policy. Online first 26 January. DOI:10.1080/13501763.2015.1114659.Google Scholar
Bayram, A. Burcu. 2016b. On the Psychological Face of Legal Obligation in International Politics. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Civic and Political Studies 11 (2):1–18.Google Scholar
Bicchieri, Cristina. 2006. The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn B., and Gardner, Wendi. 1996. Who Is This “We”? Levels of Collective Identity and Self Representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (1):83–93.Google Scholar
Brown, Garrett W., and Held, David, eds. 2010. The Cosmopolitan Reader. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J.. 2010. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buchan, Nancy R., Brewer, Marilynn B., Grimalda, Gianluca, Wilson, Rick K., Fatas, Enrique, and Foddy, Margaret. 2011. Global Social Identity and Global Cooperation. Psychological Science 22 (6):821–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchanan, Allen. 2010. The Legitimacy of International Law. In The Philosophy of International Law, edited by Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John, 79–96. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 2002. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. 3rd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald T. 1958. Common Fate, Similarity, and Other Indices of Status of Aggregates of Persons as Social Entities. Behavioral Sciences 3 (1):14–25.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler. 1995. The New Sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2001. Why Comply: Social Learning and European Identity Change. International Organization 55 (3):553–88.Google Scholar
Chen, Yan, and Li, Sherry Xin. 2009. Group Identity and Social Preferences. The American Economic Review 99 (1):431–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chittick, William O., Billingsley, Keith R., and Travis, Rick. 1995. A Three-Dimensional Model of American Foreign Policy Beliefs. International Studies Quarterly 39 (3):313–31.Google Scholar
Conover, W.J., and Iman, R. L. 1979. On Multiple-comparisons Procedures. Technical Report. LA-7677-MS. Los Alamos, NM: Scientific Laboratory.Google Scholar
Downs, George W., and Jones, Michael A.. 2002. Reputation, Compliance, and International Law. The Journal of Legal Studies 31 (1):95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter N.. 1996. Is the Good News About Compliance Good News About Cooperation? International Organization 50 (3):379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., and Kam, Cindy. 2011 Students as Experimental Participants: A Defense of the “Narrow Data Base.” In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, edited by Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., and Lupia, Arthur, 70–95. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Jonathan St. B.T. 2008. Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59 (1):255–78.Google Scholar
Falkner, Gerda, Hartlapp, Miriam, and Treib, Oliver. 2007. Worlds of Compliance: Why Leading Approaches to European Union Implementation Are Only “Sometimes True Theories.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (3):395–416.Google Scholar
Fearon, James, and Wendt, Alexander. 2002. Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth, 52–72. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Toope, Stephen J.. 2001. Alternatives to “Legalization”: Richer Views of Law and Politics. International Organization 55 (3):743–58.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas D. 1990. The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1969. The Morality of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Galpin, Charlotte. 2015. Has Germany “Fallen Out of Love” with Europe? The Eurozone Crisis and the “Normalization” of Germany's European Identity. German Politics and Society 33 (1/2):25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldgeiger, James M., and Tetlock, Philip E.. 2001. Psychology and International Relations Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 4 (1):67–92.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L., and Posner, Eric A.. 2005. The Limits of International Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Ryan, and Jinks, Derek. 2004. How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law. Duke Law Journal 54 (3):621–703.Google Scholar
Gries, Peter Hays. 2005. Social Psychology and the Identity-Conflict Debate: Is a “China Threat” Inevitable? European Journal of International Relations 11 (2):235–65.Google Scholar
Gurin, Patricia, and Townsend, Aloen. 1986. Properties of Gender Identity and Their Implications for Gender Consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology 25 (2):139–48.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T. 2008. How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Hughes, D. Alex, and Victor, David G.. 2013. The Cognitive Revolution and the Political Psychology of Elite Decision Making. Perspectives on Politics 11 (2):368–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., LeVeck, Brad L., Victor, David G., and Fowler, James H.. 2014. Decision Makers' Preferences for International Cooperation. International Organization 68 (4):845–76.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Haggard, Stephan, Lake, David A., Victor, David G.. 2017. The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S1–S31.Google Scholar
Haslam, Alexander S., McGarty, Craig, and Turner, John C.. 1996. Salient Group Memberships and Persuasion: The Role of Social Identity in the Validation of Beliefs. In What's Social About Social Cognition? Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups, edited by Nye, Judith L. and Brower, Aaron M., 29–56. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis. 1979. How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hermann, Richard K. 2017. How Attachments to the Nation Shape Beliefs About the World: A Theory of Motivated Reasoning. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S61–S84.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Richard K., Isernia, Pierangelo, and Segatti, Paolo. 2009. Attachment to the Nation and International Relations: Dimensions of Identity and Their Relationship to War and Peace. Political Psychology 30 (5):721–54.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Richard K., and Shannon, Vaughn P.. 2001. Defending International Norms: The Role of Obligation, Material Interest, and Perception in Decision Making. International Organization 55 (3):621–54.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Richard K., Tetlock, Philip E., and Visser, Penny S.. 1999. Mass Public Decisions to Go to War: A Cognitive-Interactionist Framework. American Political Science Review 93 (3):553–73.Google Scholar
Hicks, Raymond, and Tingley, Dustin. 2011. Causal Mediation Analysis. Stata Journal 11 (4):605–19.Google Scholar
Hogg, Michael A., and Terry, Deborah J.. 2000. Attitudes, Behavior, and Social Context: The Role of Norms and Group Membership. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hollingworth, Harry L. 1949. Psychology and Ethics: A Study of the Sense of Obligation. New York: The Ronald Press Company.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole, and James Rosenau, J. 1988. The Domestic and Foreign Policy Beliefs of American Leaders. Journal of Conflict Resolution 32 (2):248–94.Google Scholar
Huber, George P., and Lewis, Kyle. 2010. Cross-Understanding: Implications for Group Cognition and Performance. Academy of Management Review 35 (1):6–26.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie. 2001. From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory. Political Psychology 22 (1):127–56.Google Scholar
Hudson, Valerie M. 2005. Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations. Foreign Policy Analysis 1 (1):1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 2007. After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Huy Quy. 2011. How Middle Managers’ Group-Focus Emotions and Social Identities Influence Strategy Implementation. Strategic Management Journal 32 (13):1387–1410.Google Scholar
Imai, Kosuke, Keele, Luke, Tingley, Dustin, and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2011. Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning About Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies. American Political Science Review 105 (4):765–89.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith. 2007. Who Keeps International Commitments and Why? The International Criminal Court and Bilateral Non-Surrender Agreements. American Political Science Review 101 (3):574–89.Google Scholar
Kelman, Herbert C. 2006. Interests, Relationships, Identities: Three Central Issues for Individuals and Groups in Negotiating Their Social Environment. Annual Review of Psychology 57:1–26.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1997. International Relations and International Law: Two Optics. Harvard International Law Journal 38 (2):487–502.Google Scholar
Kertzer, Joshua D. 2017. Resolve, Time, and Risk. 2017. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S109–S136. Google Scholar
Klein, Naomi. 2000. No Logo. London: Flamingo.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold. 1997. Why Do Nations Obey International Law? Yale Law Journal 106 (8):2599–659.Google Scholar
Larson, Deborah Welch, and Shevchenko, Alexei. 2010. Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to US Primacy. International Security 34 (4):63–95.Google Scholar
Major, Brenda. 1994. From Social Inequality to Personal Entitlement: The Role of Social Comparisons, Legitimacy Appraisals, and Group Membership. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 26:293–356.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1998. The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization 52 (4):943–69.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2004. The Feeling of Rationality: The Meaning of Neuroscientific Advances for Political Science. Perspectives on Politics 2 (4):691–706.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose, and Lopez, Anthony. 2012. Psychology and Constructivism: Uneasy Bedfellows? In Psychology and Constructivism in International Relations: An Ideational Alliance, edited by Shannon, Vaughn P. and Kowert, Paul A., 197–215. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McFarland, Sam, Webb, Matthew, and Brown, Derek. 2012. All Humanity Is My Ingroup: A Measure and Studies of Identification with all Humanity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103 (5):830–53.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 1994/95. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19 (3):5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 2005. Rationality and Psychology in International Politics. International Organization 59 (1):77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Miller. 2010. Cosmopolitanism. In The Cosmopolitan Reader, edited by Brown, Garret Wallace and Held, David, 377–93. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Sarah, and Hensel, Paul R.. 2007. International Institutions and Compliance with Agreements. American Journal of Political Science 51 (4):721–37.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1985. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 2007. When Do States Follow the Laws of War? American Political Science Review 101 (3):559–72.Google Scholar
Newman, Abraham L. 2010. Flight from Risk: Unified Germany and the Role of Beliefs in the European Response to the Financial Crisis. German Politics and Society 28 (2):151–64.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 2017. Research Bets. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S265–S277.Google Scholar
Pufong, Marc G. 2001. State Obligation, Sovereignty, and Theories of International Law. Politics and Policy 29 (3):478–519.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C., Kertzer, Joshua D., and Paradis, Mark. 2017. Homo Diplomaticus: Mixed-Method Evidence of Variation in Strategic Rationality. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S33–S59.Google Scholar
Reese, Gerhard, Proch, Jutta, and Finn, Christine. 2015. Identification with All Humanity: The Role of Self-Definition and Self-Investment. European Journal of Social Psychology 45 (4): 426–40.Google Scholar
Reese, Gerhard, Rosenmann, Amir, and McGarty, Craig. 2015. Globalisation and Global Concern: Developing a Social Psychology of Human Responses to Global Challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology 45 (7):799–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renshon, Jonathan, Lee, Julia J., and Tingley, Dustin. 2017. Emotions and the Micro-Foundations of Commitment Problems. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S189–S217.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2003. Politics and International Legal Obligation. European Journal of International Relations 9 (4):591–625.Google Scholar
Reysen, Stephen, and Katzarska-Miller, Iva. 2013. A Model of Global Citizenship: Antecedents and Outcomes. International Journal of Psychology 48 (5):858–70.Google Scholar
Roccas, Sonia, and Brewer, Marilynn B.. 2002. Social Identity Complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review 6 (2):88–106.Google Scholar
Saunders, Elizabeth N. 2017. No Substitute for Experience: Presidents, Advisers, and Information in Group Decision Making. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S219–S247.Google Scholar
Shannon, Vaughn P. 2000. Norms Are What States Make of Them: The Political Psychology of Norm Violation. International Studies Quarterly 44 (2):293–316.Google Scholar
Shannon, Vaughn P., and Kowert, Paul A., eds. 2012. Psychology and Constructivism in International Relations: An Ideational Alliance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth. 2010. Treaty Compliance and Violation. Annual Review of Political Science 13 (1):273–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiro, Peter J. 2000. The New Sovereigntists: American Exceptionalism and Its False Prophets. Foreign Affairs 79 (6):9–15.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henry, and Turner, John C.. 1979. An Integrative Theory of Inter-Group Conflict. In The Social Psychology of Inter-Group Relations, edited by Austin, William G. and Worchel, Stephen, 33–47. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.Google Scholar
Terry, Deborah J., Hogg, Michael A., and McKimmie, Blake M.. 2000. Attitude-Behavior Relations: The Role of In-Group Norms and Mode of Behavioral Decision-Making. British Journal of Social Psychology 39 (3):337–61.Google Scholar
Tingley, Dustin. 2017. Rising Power on the Mind. In The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations, supplement, International Organization 71 (S1):S165–S188.Google Scholar
Turner, John C. 2005. Explaining the Nature of Power: A Three-Process Theory. European Journal of Social Psychology 35 (1):1–22.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1974. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science 185 (4157):1124–32.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 2006. Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology 57 (1):375–400.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., and Blader, Steven L.. 2003. The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review 7 (4):349–61.Google Scholar
Von Stein, Jana. 2005. Do Treaties Constrain or Screen? Selection Bias and Treaty Compliance. American Political Science Review 99 (4):611–22.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1968. Economy and Society, edited by Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Welch, Stephen, and Wittlinger, Ruth. 2011. The Resilience of the Nation-State: Cosmopolitanism, Holocaust Memory and German Identity. German Politics and Society 29 (3):38–54.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1994. Collective Identity Formation and the International State. American Political Science Review 88 (2):384–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, Michael, and Jobling, Prita. 2006. Legitimacy of Regulatory Authorities as a Function of Inclusive Identification and Power over Ingroups and Outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology 36 (2):239–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Wendy. 2000. Attitude Change: Persuasion and Social Influence. Annual Review of Psychology 51 (1):539–70.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bayram supplementary material

Bayram supplementary material

Download Bayram supplementary material(File)
File 55.8 KB