Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:33:40.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reproductive risk: its role in maternal mental health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Carol Henshaw*
Affiliation:
Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK, email chenshaw@doctors.org.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For many women, pregnancy and childbirth are not without substantial risk in terms of new-onset, recurrent or existing mental disorder. This has consequences not only in terms of poor maternal mental health but also in terms of increased pregnancy- and delivery-related morbidity and can have a significant negative impact on the wellbeing of the fetus or neonate. New-onset disorders such as postnatal depression and puerperal psychosis have been recognised for some considerable time but it is also becoming apparent that, with the exception of anorexia nervosa, severe intellectual disability and possibly schizophrenia, conception rates among women with all types of mental disorder are the same as those in the general population. In high-income countries, the widespread use of atypical antipsychotics, most of which do not impair reproductive function, may lead to increased conception rates in women with schizophrenia. In addition, pregnancy and childbirth are multifactorial stressors which may render women with previous mental disorders vulnerable to a recurrence. Hence it is no surprise that studies in urban, low-income and ethnically diverse populations in the USA estimate that around a third of pregnant women are suffering from a mental disorder when substance misuse is included (e.g. Kim et al, 2006).

Type
Special Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2010

References

Astrachan-Fletcher, E., Veldhuis, C., Lively, N., et al (2008) The reciprocal effects of eating disorders and the postpartum period: a review of the literature and recommendations for clinical care. Journal of Women's Health, 17, 227239.Google Scholar
Bloch, M., Rotenberg, N., Koren, D., et al (2005) Risk factors associated with the development of postpartum mood disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders, 88, 918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halbreich, U. & Karkun, S. (2006) Cross-cultural and social diversity of prevalence of postpartum depression and depressive symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders, 91, 97111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, H. G., Mandell, M., Crandall, C., et al (2006) Antenatal psychiatric illness and adequacy of prenatal care in an ethnically diverse inner-city obstetric population. Archives of Women's Mental Health, 9, 103107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, R. C. (2007) Maternal depression and infant growth: a review of recent evidence. Maternal and Child Nutrition, 3, 94107.Google Scholar
Viguera, A. C., Whitfield, T., Baldessarini, R. J., et al (2007) Risk of recurrence in women with bipolar disorder during pregnancy: prospective study of mood stabilizer discontinuation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 18171824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.