Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:38:20.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are family caregivers willing to pay for support interventions?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2021

Richard Schulz  and
Scott R. Beach
Richard Schulz*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and University Center for Social and Urban Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Scott R. Beach
Affiliation:
University Center for Social and Urban Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
*
Email: schulz@pitt.edu
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentary
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 33 , Special Issue 4: Issue Theme: Caring for Caregivers of People with Dementia , April 2021 , pp. 335 - 336
Copyright
© International Psychogeriatric Association 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butler, M. et al. (August 2020). Care interventions for people living with dementia and their caregivers. Comparative Effectiveness Review, 231. (Prepared by the Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2015-00008-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 20-EHC023. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Posted final reports are located on the Effective Health Care Program search page. doi: 10.23970/AHRQEPCCER231Google Scholar
Duff, P. and Dolphin, C. (2007). Cost-benefit analysis of assistive technology to support independence for people with dementia - Part 2: Results from employing the ENABLE cost-benefit model in practice. Technology and Disability, 19(2), 79–90. doi: 10.3233/TAD-2007-192-305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ENABLE Project. Retrieved from http://www.enableproject.org/Google Scholar
Hollingworth, W., McKell-Redwood, D., Hampson, L. and Metcalfe, C. (2013). Cost–utility analysis conducted alongside randomized controlled trials: Are economic end points considered in sample size calculations and does it matter? Clinical Trials, 10(1), 43–53. doi: 10.1177/1740774512465358 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jutkowitz, E. et al. (2021). A longitudinal evaluation of family caregivers’ willingness to pay for an in-home nonpharmacologic intervention for people living with dementia: Results from a randomized trial. International Psychogeriatrics, 33, 419–428.Google Scholar
Mahoney, D.M., Mutschler, P.H., Tarlow, B. and Liss, E. (2008). Real world implementation lessons and outcomes from the Worker Interactive Networking (WIN) project: workplace-based online caregiver support and remote monitoring of elders at home. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health, 14, 224–234. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2007.0046 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marti, J. (2012). Assessing preferences for improved smoking cessation medications: a discrete choice experiment. The European Journal of Health Economics, 13, 533–548. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0333-z CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Seniors Productive Ageing Centre. (2007). Using assistive technology to manage health in ageing communities: a consumer perspective. Research Bulletin, 3, 1–4.Google Scholar
Schulz, R. et al. (2014). Willingness to pay for quality of life technologies to enhance independent functioning among baby boomers and the elderly adults. The Gerontologist, 54, 363–374. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt016 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulz, R. et al. (2016). Caregivers’ willingness to pay for technologies to support caregiving. The Gerontologist, 56(5), 817–829. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv033 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed