Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T22:05:16.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reflections on wisdom at the end of life: qualitative study of hospice patients aged 58–97 years

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2018

Lori P. Montross-Thomas ,
Jamie Joseph ,
Emily C. Edmonds ,
Lawrence A. Palinkas  and
Dilip V. Jeste
Lori P. Montross-Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of Family Medicine & Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA Sam and Rose Stein Institute for Research on Aging, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
Jamie Joseph
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
Emily C. Edmonds
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
Lawrence A. Palinkas
Affiliation:
Department of Children, Youth, and Families, University of Southern California School of Social Work, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Dilip V. Jeste*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA Sam and Rose Stein Institute for Research on Aging, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Dilip V. Jeste, M.D., University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code #0664, La Jolla, California 92093-0664, USA. Phone: +1-858-534-4020. Email: djeste@ucsd.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Wisdom is a complex trait, and previous research has identified several components of wisdom. This study explored the possible impact of a diagnosis of a terminal illness on the conceptualization and evolution of wisdom while facing the end of life.

Design and Participants:

Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 21 hospice patients aged 58–97 years who were in the last six months of their life.

Methods:

Hospice patients were asked to describe the core characteristics of wisdom, as well as how their terminal illness might have impacted their understanding of this concept. The interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and coded by the research team using a grounded theory analytic approach based on coding consensus, co-occurrence, and comparison.

Results:

Broad concepts of wisdom described by the hospice patients align with the extant literature, thereby supporting those general conceptualizations. In addition, hospice patients described how their life perspectives shifted after being diagnosed with a terminal illness. Post-illness wisdom can be characterized as a dynamic balance of actively accepting the situation while simultaneously striving for galvanized growth. This delicate tension motivated the patients to live each day fully, yet consciously plan for their final legacy.

Conclusion:

The end of life offers a unique perspective on wisdom by highlighting the modulation between actively accepting the current situation while continuing the desire to grow and change at this critical time. This paradox, when embraced, may lead to even greater wisdom while facing one's own mortality.

Keywords

palliative carecancerspiritualityresilience
Type
Original Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 30 , Issue 12: Issue Theme: Positive Psychiatry , December 2018 , pp. 1759 - 1766
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ardelt, M. (2004). Wisdom as expert knowledge system: a critical review of a contemporary operationalization of an ancient concept. Human Development, 47, 257–285. doi:10.1159/000079154.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B. and Smith, J. (2008). The fascination of wisdom: its nature, ontogeny, and function. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 56–64. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00062.x.Google Scholar
Bangen, K. J., Meeks, T. W. and Jeste, D. V. (2013). Defining and assessing wisdom: a review of the literature. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21, 1254–1266. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2012.11.020.Google Scholar
Bellizzi, K. M. (2004). Expressions of generativity and posttraumatic growth in adult cancer survivors. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 58, 267–287. doi:10.2190/DC07-CPVW-4UVE-5GK0.Google Scholar
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. London; New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. and Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: a theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181. PMID:10199217.Google Scholar
Chochinov, H. M. (2007). Dignity and the essence of medicine: the A, B, C, and D of dignity conserving care. BMJ, 334, 184–197. doi:10.1136/bmj.39244.650926.47.Google Scholar
Clayton, V. (1975). Erikson's theory of human development as it applies to the aged: wisdom as contradictive cognition. Human Development, 18, 119–128.Google Scholar
Damon, W. (2000). Setting the stage for the development of wisdom: self-understanding and moral identity during adolescence. In Understanding Wisdom: Sources, Science, and Society (pp. 339–360). Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Dedoose (2015). Web Application for Managing, Analyzing, and Presenting Qualitative and Mixed Method Research Data. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC.Google Scholar
Depp, C. A. and Jeste, D. V. (2006). Definitions and predictors of successful aging: a comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14, 6–20. doi:10.1097/01.JGP.0000192501.03069.bc.Google Scholar
Diamond, L. M. and Aspinwall, L. G. (2003). Emotion regulation across the life span: an integrative perspective emphasizing self-regulation, positive affect, and dyadic processes. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 125–156.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and Society, revised 1963. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldrine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Glück, J., Bluck, S., Baron, J. and McAdams, D. P. (2005). The wisdom of experience: autobiographical narratives across adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 197–208. doi:10.1177/01650250444000504.Google Scholar
Hammarskjöld, D., Auden, W. H. and Sjöberg, L. (1964). Markings ["Vägmärken"] by Dag Hammarskjöld. Translated by Leif Sjöberg and W.H. Auden, with a Foreword by WH Auden. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Happé, F. G. E., Winner, E. and Brownell, H. (1998). The getting of wisdom: theory of mind in old age. Developmental Psychology, 34, 358–362. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.34.2.358.Google Scholar
Jeste, D. V. and Vahia, I. V. (2008). Comparison of the conceptualization of wisdom in ancient Indian literature with modern views: focus on the Bhagavad Gita. Psychiatry, 71, 197–209. doi:10.1521/psyc.2008.71.3.197.Google Scholar
Jeste, D. V., Ardelt, M., Blazer, D., Kraemer, H. C., Vaillant, G. and Meeks, T. W. (2010). Expert consensus on characteristics of wisdom: a delphi method study. The Gerontologist, 50, 668–680. doi:10.1093/geront/gnq022.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1843). Journalen JJ. In Søren Kierkegaards Skrifter (vol. 18, p. 306). Copenhagen: Søren Kierkegaard Research Center.Google Scholar
Kross, E. and Grossmann, I. (2012). Boosting wisdom: distance from the self enhances wise reasoning, attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 43–48.Google Scholar
Lerner, R. M. (2008). Spirituality, positive purpose, wisdom, and positive development in adolescence: comments on Oman, Flinders, and Thoresen's ideas about “Integrating spiritual modeling into education”. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 18, 108–118.Google Scholar
Meier, E., Gallegos, J. V., Thomas, L.P., Depp, C.A., Irwin, S. A. and Jeste, D. V. (2016). Defining a good death (successful dying): literature review and a call for research and public dialogue. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 24, 261–271.Google Scholar
Montross-Thomas, L. P. (2015). What are the most loving moments of your life? Journal of Palliative Medicine, 18, 398. doi:10.1089/jpm.2015.0006.18.5.Google Scholar
Morley, J. E. (2004). The top 10 hot topics in aging. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 59, M24–M33. doi:10.1093/gerona/59.1.M24.Google Scholar
Morse, J. M. (1995). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 147–149. doi:10.1177/104973239500500201.Google Scholar
Murray, S. A., Kendall, M., Grant, E., Boyd, K., Barclay, S. and Sheikh, A. (2007). Patterns of social, psychological, and spiritual decline toward the end of life in lung cancer and heart failure. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 34, 393–402. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.12.009.Google Scholar
NHPCO (2015). Facts and Figures: Hospice Care in America. (vol. 2016, p. 7). Alexandria, VA: National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, R. (2015). Major works on religion and politics. In Sifton, E. (ed.), The Library of America. New York, NY: Literary Classics of the United States, Inc.Google Scholar
Pasupathi, M., Staudinger, U. M. and Baltes, P.B. (2001). Seeds of wisdom: adolescents' knowledge and judgment about difficult life problems. Developmental Psychology, 37, 351–361. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.37.3.351.Google Scholar
Pinder, M. M. and Hayslip, B. Jr. (1981). Cognitive, attitudinal, and affective aspects of death and dying in adulthood: implications for care providers. Educational Gerontology: An International Quarterly, 6, 107–123. doi:10.1080/0380127810060201.Google Scholar
Smith, J. and Baltes, P. B. (1990). Wisdom-related knowledge: age/cohort differences in response to life-planning problems. Developmental Psychology, 26, 494. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.26.3.494.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Wisdom: Its Nature, Origins, and Development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Takahashi, M. (2000). Toward a culturally inclusive understanding of wisdom: historical roots in the East and West. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 51, 217–230. doi:10.2190/H45U-M17W-3AG5-TA49.Google Scholar
Thomas, M. L. et al. (2017). A new scale for assessing wisdom based on common domains and a neurobiological model: the San Diego Wisdom Scale (SD-WISE). Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.09.005.Google Scholar
Vachon, M., Fillion, L. and Achille, M. (2009). A conceptual analysis of spirituality at the end of life. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 12, 53–59. doi:10.1089/jpm.2008.0189.Google Scholar
Willms, D. G. et al. (1990). A systematic approach for using qualitative methods in primary prevention research. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 4, 391–409. doi:10.1525/maq.1990.4.4.02a00020.Google Scholar