No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
European plans for perpetual peace and their impact upon the law of war
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 January 2010
Extract
Writers have expressed the view that man's interest in projects for establishing perpetual peace is as old as man's participation in warfare. We cannot be certain that Europe can be considered the cradle of such projects for peace, although the Greek city states certainly elaborated a complex system of treaty relationships between themselves to that end. Europe was not to see a like network of sophisticated treaty relationships until the 19th century. Supporting these elaborate treaty networks was the fact that the Greeks enjoyed a common religious-legal and linguistic substratum which tended to mitigate the harshness of the intense intercity rivalries and enmities. The Greeks, as in so many other excursions in thought, were the architects of the modern array of different kinds of political treaties, e.g., of alliance, confederation, federation and, from the 4th century B.C., peace treaties of unlimited duration. In particular, religious leagues were established for the common defence of a shared and sacred shrine. Such were the Amphictyonys of the 5th century B.C. The religious bond between the cities parties to such compacts extended into the political sphere so that the city states bound thereby became confederated by the terms of the amphictyony, as was the case of the confederate association for the protection of the great shrine at Delphi.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- International Review of the Red Cross (1961 - 1997) , Volume 19 , Issue 213 , December 1979 , pp. 283 - 300
- Copyright
- Copyright © International Committee of the Red Cross 1979
Footnotes
Paper delivered as a public lecture in the University of Sussex, 5 March 1979.
References
page 292 note 1 Original title: “Le Nouveau Cynée, ou Discours d'état représentant les occasions et moyens d'établir une paix générale.”
page 294 note 1 Repeated in his Contrat social, Book 1, chap. 4. This view was adopted by Portalis in 1801.—See Lassudrie-Duchêne, , Jean-Jacques Rousseau et le droit des gens (1906).Google Scholar
page 296 note 1 Named after the then American Secretary of State, John Jay.