Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:10:01.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jonathan Moore (ed.) Hard choices: Moral dilemmas in humanitarian Intervention, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Oxford, 1998, 322 pages

Review products

Jonathan Moore (ed.) Hard choices: Moral dilemmas in humanitarian Intervention, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Oxford, 1998, 322 pages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2010

Frédéric Mégret
Frédéric Mégret
Affiliation:
Ph.D. candidate, University of Paris I
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Livres et revues/Books and reviews
Information
International Review of the Red Cross , Volume 81 , Issue 833: Débat humanitaire/Humanitarian Debate , March 1999 , pp. 182 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © International Committee of the Red Cross 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

l Larry Minear makes a similar point in relation to the dual nature of sanctions as a means of implementation and thus an «effective expression of international law and expression of human rights and humanitarian values» on the one hand, and as a cause of «hardship for the targeted country» on the other.

2 Colin Granderson's reminder that the joint OAS/UN International Civilian Mission in Haiti (MICIVIH) ended up having to monitor the human rights record ofthe UN Mission in Haiti (UNMIH) also highlights the need for such independence.

3 Mary B. Anderson makes a similar point when she remarks that the growing profession-alization of humanitarian aid, and its control by Western donors, contributes to the alienation of victims. Treating “victims as partners” instead is likely to substantially affect the way in which humanitarian work can be conducted.

4 Particularly noteworthy for their frankness and their willingness to accept failure in some circumstances are the contributions of Kofi Annan and Romeo Dallaire.