Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:43:43.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2014

Barak Medina
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Israel Law Review , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , Winter 2006 , pp. 6 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Co-editor of the Israel Law Review and Joseph H. & Belle R. Braun Senior Lecturer in Law, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

References

1 Tamir, Yael, Two Concepts of Multiculturalism, 29 J. Phil. Edu. 161 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 See, e.g., Raz, Joseph, Disagreement in Politics, 43 Am. J. Juris. 25 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gutmann, Amy & Thompson, Dennis, Democracy and Disagreement (1996)Google Scholar; Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement (Macedo, Stephen ed., 1999)Google Scholar.

3 See, e.g., Gavison, Ruth, The Role of Courts in Rifted Democracies, 33 Isr. L. Rev. 216 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Issacharoff, Samuel, Constiutionalizing Democracy in Fractured Societies, 82 Tex. L. Rev. 1861 (2004)Google Scholar.

4 Waldron, Jeremy, Law and Disagreement (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Id. at 254.

6 Id. at 109.

7 See, e.g., Cooter, Robert D., The Strategic Constitution 17–78 (2002)Google Scholar; Mashaw, Jerry L., Greed, Chaos, and Governance: Using Public Choice to Improve Public Law (1997)Google Scholar; Elhauge, Einer R., Does Interest Group Theory Justify More Intrusive Judicial Review?, 101 Yale L.J. 31 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 See also Waldron, Jeremy, The Dignity of Legislation (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 See, e.g., Tushnet, Mark, Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (1999)Google Scholar; Constitutional Politics (Barber, Sotirios A. & George, Robert P. eds., 2001)Google Scholar.

10 For the use of this term see, e.g., Allan, James, Liberalism, Democracy, and Hong Kong, 28 Hong Kong L.J. 156, 167 (1998)Google Scholar; Allan, James & Huscroft, Grant, Constitutional Rights Coming Home To Roost? Rights Internationalism In American Courts, 43 San Diego L. Rev. 1, 36 (2006)Google Scholar.

11 Posner, Richard A., Book Review: Review of Jeremy Waldron, Law And Disagreement, 100 Colum. L. Rev. 582 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Eskridge, William N. Jr., The Circumstances of Politics and the Application of Statutes, 100 Colum. L. Rev. 558 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Estlund, David, Jeremy Waldron on Law and Disagreement, 99 Phil. Stud. 111 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Downs, Donald A., Review of Law and Disagreement by Jeremy Waldron, 94 Am. Political Science Rev. 182 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Christiano, Thomas, Waldron on Law and Disagreement, 19 L. & Phil. 513 (2000)Google Scholar; Smith, D., Disagreeing with Waldron: Waldron on Law and Disagreement, 7 Res Publica 57 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ripstein, Arthur, Book Review: Law and Disagreement, 110 Phil. Rev. 611 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stone, Adrienne, Book Review: Law and Disagreement, 26 Melbourne U. L. Rev. (2002)Google Scholar; Marmor, Andrei, Book Review of J. Waldron, Law and Disagreement & The Dignity of Legislation, 112 Ethics 410 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; North, Richard, A Response to Jeremy Waldron's Law and Disagreement, 1 Political Stud. Rev. 167 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kavanagh, Aileen, Participation and Judicial Review: A Reply to Waldron, 22 L. & Phil. 451 (2003)Google Scholar.

12 Geller, Joshua R., Symposium Issue: Foreword: Legislatures, Courts, and the Contestability of Rights, 6 N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub. Pol'y 1 (2002–2003)Google Scholar. This symposium includes comments by Lawrence G. Sager, Keith E. Whittington, Cristopher L. Eisgruber, and John E. Ferejohn.

13 Waldron himself has recently published an updated version of his view against judicial review. See Waldron, Jeremy, The Core of the Case against Judicial Review, 115 Yale L.J. 1346 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 CA 6821/93 United Bank Hamizrahi v. Migdal [1995] IsrSC 49(4) 221. See, e.g., Barak-Erez, Daphne, From an Unwritten to a Written Constitution: the Israeli Challenge in American Perspective, 26 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 309 (1995)Google Scholar; Hofhung, Menahem, The Unintended Consequences of Unplanned Constitutional Reform: Constitutional Politics in Israel, 44 Am. J. Comp. L. 585 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barak, Aharon, The Constitutionalization of the Israeli Legal System as Result of the Basic Laws and its Effect on Procedural and Substantive Criminal Law, 31 Isr. L. Rev. 3 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gavison, Ruth, A Constitutional Revolution?, in Towards a New European Ius Commune 517 (Gambaro, A. & Rabello, A.M. eds., 1999)Google Scholar; Domer, Dalia, Does Israel have a Constitution?, 43 St. Louis L.J. 1325 (1999)Google Scholar; Mandel, Michael, Democracy and the New Constitutionalism in Israel, 33 Isr. L. Rev. 259 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jacobsohn, Gary J., After the Revolution, 34 Isr. L. Rev. 139, 140 (2000)Google Scholar; Cohen, Barak, Empowering Constitutionalism with Text from an Israeli Perspective, 18 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 585 (2003)Google Scholar.

15 This argument is elaborated in Eylon, Yuval & Harel, Alon, The Right to Judicial Review, 92 Va. L. Rev. 991 (2006)Google Scholar.

16 These qualifications are elaborated in Waldron, supra note 11.