Article contents
The Colonial Office, British Business Interests and the Reform of Cocoa Marketing in West Africa, 1937–1945*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2009
Extract
This article examines the actions of the British Colonial Office and British business interests in the international marketing of cocoa from Ghana and Nigeria in the later 1930s, when problems in cocoa marketing were brought to head by the expatriate firms forming a ‘Pool’ and the farmers responding to this — and to a sudden fall in their terms of trade — with a ‘hold-up’, which was followed by a British commission of inquiry, and during the second world war and immediate post-war era, when the C.O. imposed a marketing system designed by the expatriate merchant firms and subsequently decided to make it into a permanent peacetime reorganization. The close contact between the CO. and British firms such as the United Africa Company and Cadbury Bros. is brought out, as is the support given by the officials to these companies before and during the war. A further theme is a certain antipathy displayed by the officials for African capitalists in general and cocoa traders in particular and the way in which the war-time scheme squeezed African and other non-British small cocoa-export firms in many cases out of business.
The war-time scheme convinced the C.O. that a peacetime system of fixed buying prices which were set well below the world price was desirable as a means of eradicating ‘middleman abuses’ and of building up large ‘stabilization funds’ to protect the cocoa farmers in future years when prices might fall. Continuation of the scheme was thus seen as an act of trusteeship. It was also attractive to the British Treasury because it maximized U.S. dollar earnings for Britain from the sale of West African cocoa. In contrast to interpretations put forward by some other historians, this article argues that the Colonial Office had close, day-to-day contact with the leading British firms involved, that it strongly supported the ‘Pool’ system before and during the early stages of the war, and that the post-war marketing structure was an outcome of the war-time scheme and not of the Nowell Commission report of 1938. Finally, having lost in an unequal struggle with the expatriate firms and the Colonial Office between 1937 and 1944, African international shippers of cocoa were permanently excluded.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988
References
1 Bauer, P. T., ‘Origins of statutory export monopolies of British West Africa’, Business Hist. Rev. XXVIII (1954), 205.Google Scholar
2 Meredith, David, ‘State controlled marketing and economic “development”: the case of West African produce during the Second World War’, Econ. Hist. Rev. 2nd ser., xxxix, I (1986), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Westcott, Nicholas, ‘The East African sisal industry, 1929–1949: the marketing of a colonial commodity during depression and war’, J. Afr. Hist. xxv, 4 (1984), 445–61;CrossRefGoogle ScholarPalmer, Robin, ‘The Nyasaland tea industry in the era of international tea restrictions, 1933–1950’,J. Afr. Hist. XXVI, 2–3 (1985), 211–39.Google Scholar
4 Milburn, Josephine, ‘The 1938 Gold Coast cocoa crisis: British business and the Colonial Office’, Afr. Hist. Studies, III, I (1970), 72;Google ScholarIdem, British Business and Ghanian Independence (1977), 26.
5 Hopkins, A. G., ‘Big Business in African Studies’, J. Afr. Hist. XXVIII, 1 (1987), 129–30.Google Scholar
6 League of Nations, Journal of the Economic and Monetary Conference (London, 1933),60;Google ScholarC.O. to Foreign Office, 9 February. 1934, Public Records Office (London), CO. 323/1300/31925/34.Google Scholar
7 Minute by Eastwood, C. C., 24 September 1937, C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar
8 Minute by Clauson, G. (Assistant Secretary, Colonial Office and Head of the Economic Department,) 27 November 1937, C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar
9 C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar
10 C.O. 85267/15006/3/37.Google Scholar
11 C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar
12 On the Gold Coast cocoa hold-up see Miles, John, ‘Rural protest in the Gold Coast:the cocoa hold-ups, 1908–1938’, in Hopkins, A. G. and Dewey, Clive (eds), The Imperial Impact: Studies in the Economic History of Africa and India (London, 1978);Google ScholarGrier, Beverly C., ‘Cocoa marketing in colonial Ghana: capitalist enterprise and the emergence of a rural African bourgeoisie’, paper presented to the African Studies Association Conference, Los Angeles, 1979;Google ScholarGrier, ‘Cocoa, class formation and the state in Ghana’ (Ph.D. thesis, Yale University, 1979).Google Scholar
13 Minute by Fiddian, A. J. (Principal, Colonial Oflice), 5 Feb. 1931, CO. 96/696/ 6844/31.Google Scholar
14 The terms of trade have been calculated from trade statistics in Gold Coast, Blue Book, Trade Returns, 1928–1938.Google Scholar
15 Evening Standard (London) 24 Oct. 1937;Google ScholarFinancial News (London) 30 Oct. 1937;Google ScholarThe Times (London) 30 Oct. 1937.Google Scholar
16 Lord Trenchard, Chairman of U.A.C., telephoned Sir Cosmo Parkinson (Assistant Under Secretary of State) with news of the hold-up on 15 Nov. 1937, C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar
17 C.O. to Gold Coast, telegram, 15 Nov.. 1937, CO. 852/67/25006/3/37.Google Scholar
18 CO. to Gold Coast, telegram (2),24 Nov. 1937, C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar
19 C.O. to Gold Coast, telegram, 1 Dec. 1937, C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar
20 Gold Coast to CO., telegram, 3 Dec. 1937, C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar
21 Hodson to Ormsby-Gore, 11 Nov. 1937, CO. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar
22 Cadbury and Samuel to Trenchard, 3 Dec. 1937, C.O. 15006/3/37; notes of meeting between Messrs. Mellor and Knight (U.A.C,) and Sir Cecil Bottomley (Assistant Under Secretary of State) at C.O., 4 Dec. 1937, C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar
23 Meeting, 4 Dec. 1937, C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar
24 Notes of meeting between Cadbury and Trenchard and Ormsby-Gore, 7 Dec. 1937, C.O. 852/67/15006/3/37.Google Scholar
25 CO. to Gold Coast, telegram, 24 June. 1938, C.O. 852/133/15006/3/38.Google Scholar
26 Minute by Clauson, 5 June. 1938, CO.852/133/15006/3/38.Google Scholar
27 Notes of meeting between Samuel and Cadbury and Clauson, 18 Jan. 1938, CO. 852/133/15006/3/38.Google Scholar
28 Gold Coast to C.O., 28 June. 1938, C.O. 852/133/115006/3/38; Ormsby-Gore informed the Cabinet on 1 Feb.Google Scholar
29 U.A.C. to CO., 6 April. 1938, C.O. 852/133/15006/3/38.Google Scholar
30 Gold Coast to CO., telegram, 21 Apr. 1938, CO. 852/133/15006/3/38.Google Scholar
31 Notes of meeting between representatives of U.A.C. and Cadbury Bros., and C.O., 1 Sept. 1938; notes of telephone conversation between Mellor (U.A.C.) and Sir Henry Moore (Assistant Under Secretary of State), 6 Sept., C.O. 852/134/15006/3/38.Google Scholar
32 C.O. to Gold Coast, telegram, 12 Sept. 1938, C.O. 852/134/15006/3/38.Google Scholar
33 Report of the Commission on the Marketing of West African Cocoa, British Parliamentary Papers [hereafter B.P.P.J, 1937–1938, iX, Cmd. 5845, 191.Google Scholar
34 Gold Coast to CO., 1 Jun. 1939, CO. 852/192/15006/IF/39.Google Scholar
35 C.O. to Gold Coast, 31 Aug. 1939, CO. 852/192/15006/IF/39.Google Scholar
36 U.A.C. to C.O., 11 Sept. 1939, CO. 852/256/16015/39/1.Google Scholar
37 Minute by Lord Dufferin and Ava (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for the Colonies), 21 Sept. 1939, CO. 852/256/16015/39/1;Google Scholarminute by Carstairs, C. Y., 6 May 1943, CO. 852/530/19875/9/1/43.Google Scholar
38 Sir Henry Moore to Lord Dufferin and Ava, 21 Sept. 1939, C.O. 852/256/16015 39/1;Google ScholarC.O. to Treasury, 19 Sept. 1940, CO. 852/319/18015/IK/40.Google Scholar
39 C.O. to Gold Coast and Nigeria, 23 Sept. 1939, CO. 852/256/16015/39/I,Google Scholar
40 Ibid.
41 First revised draft of control scheme, 18 Nov. 1939, C.O. 852/256/16015/39/3.Google Scholar
42 Memorandum by the Association of West African Merchants, 3 Nov. 1939, C.O. 852/256/16015/39/2.Google Scholar
43 Ibid.
44 Coddington and Lamb Ltd. to CO., 29 Dec. 1939, C.O. 852/256/16015/39/4.Google Scholar
45 Minutes of third meeting of Gold Coast Cocoa Committee, 23 Dec. 1939, C.O. 852/ 256/16015/39/4.Google ScholarIn the Gold Coast, Sir Nana Ofori Atta demanded 50,000 tons for ‘B’ shippers: Ghana National Archives (hereafter G.N.A.), C.S.O. 506/39/SF3.Google Scholar
46 U.A.C. to CO., 29 Nov. 1939, C.O. 852/256/ 6015/39/3.Google Scholar
47 Gold Coast to C.O., 29 Dec. 1939, C.O. 852/318/18015/1/40.Google Scholar
48 C.O. to Leventis, 16 Oct 1940, C.O. 852/318/18105/1H/40.Google Scholar
49 G.N.A., C.S.O. B.F.0001/114 (1940).Google Scholar
50 Gold Coast to C.O. 16 Jun. 1940, C.O. 852/318/18015/1/40.Google Scholar
51 C.O. to Gold Coast., 20 Mar. 1940, C.O. 852/318/18015/11/40. See also the case of G. D. Egremont, whom the Gold Coast Government supported, G.N.A., C.S.O. 506/ 39/SF2O/ 1940.Google Scholar
52 Ibid
53 Nigeria to CO., 27 Nov. 1939, C.O. 852/256/16015/39/3.Google Scholar
54 Minute by Williams, O. G., 5 Mar. 1940, C.O. 852/318/18015/1D/40.Google Scholar
55 Minute by Melville, E., 4 May 1940, C.O. 852/318/18015/1/40.Google Scholar
56 Minutes of meeting of W.A.C.C.B., 12 Sept. 1940, C.O. 852/319/18015/1M(i)40.Google Scholar
57 C.O. to Gold Coast, 1 Sept. 1940, C.O. 852/318/18015/IK/40.Google Scholar
58 Ibid.
59 Minute by Melville, 19 Sept. 1940, CO. 852/318/18015/1K/40.Google Scholar
60 Minute by Melville, 12 Jun. 1940, C.O. 852/318/18015/1K/40;Google ScholarGovernor Hodson expressed similar sentiments in March 1940, G.N.A., B.F. 0028/1/40.Google Scholar
61 Melville to Caine, 10 Feb. 1941, C.O. 85/444/18015/IH/41.Google Scholar
62 Minute by Caine, 3 Jun. 1941, CO. 852/444/18015/1H/41.Google Scholar
63 Minute by Caine, 1 Dec. 1941, C.O. 852/444/18015/ID/41.Google Scholar
64 Ibid
65 Tansley to Miles, 4 Jun. 1941, CO. 853/4/18015/1D/41.Google Scholar
66 Minute by Williams, 28 Nov. CO. 852/444/ 18015/1D/41.Google Scholar
67 Minute by Henlen, 1 Dec. C.O. 852/4/18015/1D/41;Google ScholarCocoa Association of London to C.O., 23 Dec. CO. 852/445/18015/1K(3)42.Google Scholar
68 Colonial Secretary, Gold Coast to Melville, 18 Jul. C.O. 852/445/18015/IK/41.Google Scholar
69 Tansley to Henlen, 8 Jun. 1942, C.O. 852/445/18015/1K(3)42.Google Scholar
70 W.A.P.C.B. Paper No. 21, 10 Sept. 1943, CO. 852/512/19601/43.Google Scholar
71 Minutes of meeting between Gerard Creasy, Eric Tansley and representatives of the Gold Coast Government, Accra, 13 Jun. 1944, C.O. 852/595/19601/9/44.Google Scholar
72 CO. to Gold Coast and Nigeria, Aug. 1943, C.O. 852/445/18015/1K/41;Google ScholarC.O.memorandum, Oct. 1943, C.O. 852/525/19760/43.Google Scholar See also: Bauer, P. T.. West African Trade: A Study of Competition, Oligopoly and Monopoly in a Changing Economy (Cambridge, 1954); Bauer, ‘Origins of the statutory export monopolies’; Meredith,‘State controlled marketing’.Google Scholar
73 Accumulated cocoa profits stood at £37 millions at the end of the 1942–1943 season; the U.S.A. took 39 per cent of the cocoa sold by the Board in 1942–1943, but profit per ton on U.S. sales was £12.3.4d compared to £6.5.od per ton on sales to the Ministry of Food (Report on Cocoa Control in West Africa 1939–1943 and Statement of Future Policy(B.P.P.1943–1944, iii, 153, Cmd. 6554); W.A.P.C.B., C.O. 852/525/19760/74/1/43).Google Scholar
74 CO. Memorandum, 10 Oct. 1943, CO. 852/525/19760/43.Google Scholar
75 Cadbury to Creasy, 6 Mar. 1945, C.O. 852/596/19601/9/7/PT2/45.Google Scholar
76 Cadbury to Ministry of Supply, 13 Mar. 1942, C.O. 852/318/18015/G1/42.Google Scholar
77 Minutes of meeting between Secretary of State for the Colonies and the Association of West African Merchants Cocoa Sub-Committee, 15 Nov. 1944, C.O. 852/596/19601/ 9/7/44.Google Scholar
78 Joint Provincial Council to Gold Coast Government, 26 Jun. C.O. 852/596/19601/9/7/PT2/45Google Scholar see also, Echo, Daily, 26 Oct. 1945Google Scholar and Gold Coast Independent, 28 Oct. 1945.Google Scholar
79 Minute by Creasy, 1 Jul. C.O. 852/596/19601/9/7/PT2/45.Google Scholar
80 Minutes of a meeting between Cadbury Bros., Frys, Rowntrees, C.W.S and Lyons and Creasy, 21 Sept. 1944 C.O. 852/595/19601/9/44.Google Scholar
81 Gold Coast to C.O., 9 Oct. C.O. 852/596/19601/9/7/44.Google Scholar
82 Nigeria to C.O., 13 May 1944, C.O. 852/595/19601/9/4/44.Google Scholar
83 C.O. to Gold Coast, 10 Dec. 1945, C.O. 852/596/19601/9/7/PT3/45.Google Scholar
84 For example, Clauson met Samuel at the Savoy Hotel on 12 Jun. 1938 (Samuel told him he thought the hold-up would soon end), and in October 1938 the Secretary of State gave a dinner party for ‘leading personalities’ of the U.A.C.Google Scholar (Minute by Clauson, 13 Jun. 1937, C.O. 852/133/15006/3/38; note by Eastwood, 18 Oct. 1938, CO. 852/134/15006/3/38).Google Scholar
85 Some years previously Hodson (as Governor of Sierra Leone) was in trouble at the Colonial Office over the gift of a diamond to Lady Hodson from Consolidated African Selection Trust Ltd., which was in negotiation with the Sierra Leone Government for diamond-mining rights. (CO. 267/642/2094/1933; this incident is also discussed in Kaniki, Michael, ‘Economic change in Sierra Leone during the 1930s’, Trans-African Journal of History, III, I-II (1973), 72–95.)Google Scholar
86 Wickizer, V. D., Coffee, Tea and Cocoa: An Economic and Political Analysis (Stanford, 1951), 324.Google Scholar
87 W.A.C.P.B. Policy Paper No. 7, 24 Nov. 1942, C.O. 852/533/3/42.Google Scholar
88 CO to Gold Coast and Nigeria, 1 Dec. 1939, CO. 852/256/16015/PT3/39.Google Scholar
89 Minute by Clauson, 11 Sept. 1940, CO. 852/318/18015/1K/40.Google Scholar
90 Nigeria to C.O., 13 May 1944, CO. 852/595/19601/9/4/44.Google Scholar
91 Gold Coast to C.O., 11 Feb. 1945;Google ScholarNigeria to C.O., 15 Feb. 1945, C.O. 852/596/19601/9/7/45.Google Scholar
92 CO. to Gold Coast and Nigeria, 22 Nov. CO. 852/596/19601/9/7/PT3/45.Google Scholar
93 Ibid.
- 8
- Cited by