Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:03:29.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE DECOLONIZATION OF EQUATORIAL GUINEA: THE RELEVANCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL FACTOR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2003

ALICIA CAMPOS
ALICIA CAMPOS
Affiliation:
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The demise of Spanish colonialism in Central Africa has to be understood as part of the general process of African decolonization. In accepting the methodological framework proposed by some historians for studying the collapse of European domination in the continent, we can explain the independence of Equatorial Guinea, in 1968, as a result of the interaction between three different factors: international, metropolitan and colonial. This article delineates the decolonization of the only Spanish colony south of the Sahara, its main argument being that, in the case of Equatorial Guinea, the international factor – specifically, the role of the United Nations – is fundamental to the understanding of the timing, the actors' strategies and the results.

Keywords

Equatorial Guineadecolonizationnationalism
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , March 2003 , pp. 95 - 116
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article is based on my Ph.D. thesis, ‘Política exterior, cambio normativo internacional y surgimiento del estado postcolonial: la Descolonización de Guinea Ecuatorial 1955–1968’ (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 2000). A book derived from the thesis has just appeared: Alicia Campos Serrano, De colonia a estado: Guinea Ecuatorial, 1955–1968 (Madrid, 2002). The article was completed at the Centre of International Studies of the University of Cambridge and Sidney Sussex College thanks to a scholarship awarded by La Caixa-British Council during the academic year 2000–1. I would like to thank especially Francisco Javier Peñas, James Mayall, John Iliåe, John Lonsdale, Ramon Sarró, Elissa Jobson, Lloyd Rundle and all the participants in the African History Group in Cambridge and the Grupo de Estudios Africanos in Madrid for their kind help in producing this essay.