Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T16:48:33.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The East African Sisal Industry, 1929–1949: The Marketing of a Colonial Commodity During Depression and War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Nicholas Westcott
Nicholas Westcott
Affiliation:
London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Sisal growing spread rapidly in East Africa during the 1920s and 1930s to become one of the most important export crops in both Kenya and Tanganyika. The sisal industry nevertheless suffered severely from the low prices and erratic commodity markets which characterized the depression. Producers blamed the merchants and merchants blamed the market, but the sisal growers began increasingly to look for ways to bring marketing under their own control in the hope of securing a better return. During the Second World War, state control over the sisal trade enabled producers, through their powerful growers' associations, to exert a greater influence over marketing than ever before. They used this and the dramatic wartime change in market conditions, firstly, to improve the price paid them by the Ministry of Supply and, secondly, to try to consolidate their control over marketing after the war when government purchase ended. In this way they were actively supported by the Colonial Office but vigorously opposed by the London-based merchants and their client growers in East Africa. After a long struggle the independent producers failed to gain the complete control they wanted, but nevertheless considerably strengthened their own hand and reversed a trend towards greater metropolitan control over the sisal industry which had developed during the thirties. Producers could not single-handedly stabilize the market for their commodity, but through concerted action they were able to improve their return from it. The study raises questions about the assumptions behind both liberal and Marxist interpretations of imperial trade and shows that in the case of one of East Africa's most important exports relations between producers and traders were more complex than has been assumed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , October 1984 , pp. 445 - 461
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The literature is too large to list, but see, e.g., Brett, E. A., Colonialism and Under-development in East Africa, 1919–1939 (London, 1973)Google Scholar; Swainson, N., The Development of Corporate Capitalism in Kenya, 1918–1977 (London, 1980)Google Scholar; and for a different area and ideological perspective, Bauer, P. T., West African Trade (Cambridge, 1954).Google Scholar For help in collecting the information on which this paper is based I am grateful to the Directors and staffs of the Tanzania National Archives (TNA), Dar es Salaam, and the Public Record Office, Kew (for the Colonial Office (CO) papers), and to Mr J. Hugh Leslie of Wigglesworth & Co. I am also grateful to Professor Fieldhouse and other members of the Development Studies Association seminar for comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

2 Harlow, V. and Chilver, E. M. (eds.), History of East Africa, vol. II (Oxford, 1965), 219–236Google Scholar; Iliffe, J., A Modern History of Tanganyika (Cambridge, 1979), 146–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar The problems of production are discussed elsewhere. Here I shall concentrate on the questions of financial control and marketing.

3 Iliffe, , Tanganyika, 261–263.Google Scholar

4 ‘List of registered sisal estates’, 1940Google Scholar, TNA 29113/57D. Stahl, K. M., The Metropolitan Organisation of British Colonial Trade (London, 1951), 248–272.Google Scholar Information from Wigglesworth's and Mr Anver Karimjee. Wigglesworth's also represented the one major sisal estate in Portugese East Africa, which exported some 3–4,000 tons a year.

5 ‘Sisal production in British East Africa’, Note by C.O., 16 Sept. 1943Google Scholar, CO 852/517/5. (I have used the new CO 852 classification, omitting original file numbers, for the sake of brevity.) Discussions with London sisal merchants, C. H. Dale, 20 Sept. 1930, TNA 11475/1/93. Stahl, , Colonial Trade, 146–147, 271Google Scholar; Guillebaud, C. W., The Sisal Industry of Tanganyika (Welwyn, 1958), 18–25Google Scholar; Lock, G. W., Sisal (London, 1962), 323–325.Google Scholar

6 ‘Memorandum on the sisal industry and taxation’, Hitchcock, E. F., Dec. 1941Google Scholar, TNA 30015/1/117. ‘Tanganyika's merchant princes’, Caltex Star, III 9 (Sept. 1959), 4–7Google Scholar (kindly lent me by Mr Karimjee).

7 Correspondence in TNA 11475/1 and TSGA Report for 1937, TNA 19475/1. Iliffe, , Tanganyika, 352.Google Scholar

8 Provincial Commissioner Tanga to Chief Secretary (CS), 19 Sept, 1931, and Lead to CS, 3 Nov. 1931, TNA 11475/1/239, 247.

9 Hitchcock, Sir Eldred, ‘The sisal industry of East Africa’, Tanganyika Notes and Records, 52 (1959), 11.Google ScholarBrett, , Under development, 170–173.Google Scholar

10 Hitchcock, , ‘Sisal industry’, 10–12.Google ScholarStahl, , Colonial Trade, 249, 258–264.Google Scholar

11 Note of TSGA meeting with Government, 13 Dec. 1930, and Report of TSGA Committee, TNA 11475/1/118,188; TSGA Committee meeting, 16 Sept. 1938, TNA 22472/161. Hitchcock to J. M. Keynes, 19 Feb., and Hitchcock note of 16 April 1941, CO 852/432/6. ‘Memorandum on the sisal industry’, Bosanquet, N. (SGA), 11 Dec. 1942Google Scholar, CO 852/432/8. Stahl, , Colonial Trade, 271.Google ScholarWigglesworth, A., A Retrospect, 1895–1935 (London, 1935), 7.Google Scholar

12 Correspondence in CO 852/2/7 (1935). Sisal Review (London), Jan. and March 1938.Google ScholarBrett, , Underdevelopment, 151.Google ScholarRowe, J. W. F., Primary Commodities in International Trade (Cambridge, 1965), 136–155.Google Scholar

13 Stahl, Colonial Trade, 249–60. Sisal Review (1938).Google Scholar

14 Hitchcock to Marlow, 4 May 1944, CO 852/609/4.

15 Correspondence in TNA 22472; TSGA meeting, 21 Oct. 1944, TNA 29513/1/57. ‘Co-operative marketing’, memorandum by Bovill, E. W., March 1943Google Scholar, CO 852/517/8. Sisal Review, Sept. 1938.Google Scholar

16 Wakefield to CS, 6 June, and Sisal Board meetings, Dec. 1938, TNA 22472. Sisal Review, Jan. 1939.Google Scholar

17 Hitchcock to Lead, 9 Sept. 1940, TNA 27674/111/247; Hitchcock to Bretherton, 28 May 1947, TNA 29513/11/189; C.O. to Melville, 18 Dec. 1941, CO 852/431/12; negotiations in CO 852/311/8 and CO 852/431/10.

18 Goldberg (M.o.S.) to Figg (C.O.), 8 Aug, 1941, CO 852/431/11. Hurstfield, J., The Control of Raw Materials (HMSO, 1953), 258.Google Scholar

19 Tanganyika, , Agricultural Report, 1939, p. 2.Google ScholarStahl, , Colonial Trade, 258.Google Scholar

20 TSGA meeting, 21 Oct. 1939, TNA 19417/11/11. Correspondence in CO 852/311/8 and 9.

21 C.O. to Governor, 21 Sept. 1940, and other items in TNA 27674/111; material in TNA 29113 and TNA 29513/1. Hitchcock to Figg, 1 July 1941, CO 852/432/6.

22 Notes of meetings and correspondence in CO 852/311/10 (1940) and CO 852/431/11 (1941).

23 Melville to Caine, 25 Sept. 1941, CO 852/431/11.

24 Believing there were ‘several government officials, entirely ignorant of business but ideologically at war with non-socialist enterprise in all forms’ and whose ‘ignorance was total’ in regard to sisal marketing. I am grateful to Mr Aschan of Wigglesworth's for his reminiscences of this period.

25 Correspondence in CO 852/431/11 and 12. The Ministry sold surplus sisal to the USA on a ‘no profit no loss basis’.

26 Minute by Carstairs, , 16 April 1943Google Scholar, CO 852/517/6.

27 TSGA meeting (Tanga), 6 May 1940, TNA 19417/11/22; memorandum by Hitchcock, Dec. 1941, TNA 30015/1/117. Correspondence and meetings, Jan.-Feb. 1941, CO852/432/6. Report by Sir J. Foley, 1944, CO 822/117/46748/2. Stahl, , Colonial Trade, 258.Google Scholar

28 TSGA Report for 1943. TNA 29513/1/33. Minute by Carstairs, 16 April 1943, CO 852/517/6; Killham to Hempo, 9 Jan. 1944, CO 852/609/1.

29 C.O. to Governor Tanganyika, 3 April 1942, CO 852/431/13; Note for Secretary of State, 14 Sept. 1943, CO 852/517/5. Record of E.A. Governors’ Conference meeting, 22 Nov. 1943, CO 822/107/46506/E; TSGA meeting, 11 Nov. 1943, TNA 29513/1/31. The Royal Navy converted entirely to sisal ropes during the war.

30 TSGA Annual Reports, 1944–6. Westcott, N. J., ‘The impact of the second world war on Tanganyika, 1939–1949’ (Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge, 1982), 87–93Google Scholar for full references.

31 See CO 852/517/6 and CO 852/609/1.

32 Governor's Deputy to C.O., 9 Feb. 1944, CO 852/609/1.

33 Shillidy (M.o.S.) to Helsby (Treasury), 7 Aug. 1943, and Helsby to Shillidy, 18 Aug. 1943, CO 852/517/7.

34 Shillidy to Carstairs, 11 March 1944, CO 852/609/1.

35 Correspondence and meetings, 1946, CO 852/609/3. Minutes by Melville, Jan 1947, CO 852/925/1.

36 Hitchcock to Bretherton (B.o.T.), 20 Jan. 1947, and Melville to Proctor (Treas.), 13 Feb. 1947, CO 852/925/1. Melville to Sandford (CS), 11 March 1947, TNA 16682/1/73. Melville to Leslie (Tanganyika), 8 Jan. 1948, CO 852/925/2.

37 Bretherton to Proctor, 20 May 1946, CO 852/609/3.

38 Flett (Treas.) to Shillidy, 28 Feb 1947, CO 852/925/1. Hitchcock to Bretherton, 28 May 1947, TNA 16682/I/30E.

39 Minutes by Hadow, and Governor, , April 1947Google Scholar, TNA 16079/V/746–7. C.O. to Governor Tanganyika, 8 March 1947, CO 852/925/1. Westcott, , ‘Impact’ 329.Google Scholar

40 Correspondence in CO 852/925/2. US Consul Nairobi to CS, 3 Sept 1947, and C.O. to Governor, 26 March 1948, TNA 16682/1/113 and 149.

41 Guillebaud, , Sisal Industry, 27–32.Google Scholar

42 Keynes to Leith Ross, 26 Feb. 1941, CO 852/432/6. Hitchcock to Marlow, 4 May 1944, CO 852/609/4.

43 Minute by Clauson, 22 Dec. 1942, CO 852/432/8. Clauson to Jackson (Governor Tanganyika), 9 Dec. 1943, CO 852/517/8. Rowe, , Primary Commodities, 155–161.Google ScholarGardner, R. N., Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy (Oxford, 1956), 365–380.Google Scholar

44 Jackson to Stanley, 14 Aug. 1943, and minute by Bull, 6 Oct. 1943, CO 852/517/8.

45 Bosanquet memorandum, 11 Dec. 1942, CO 852/432/8. Bovill memorandum, March 1943, and minute by Clauson, 28 Oct. 1943, CO 852/517/8.

46 TSGA meeting (with Chairman of SGA), 21 Oct. 1944, TNA 29513/1/57

47 Clauson to Battershill (Governor Tanganyika), 20 July 1945, CO 852/609/5.

48 Information gleaned from CO 852/609/4 and TNA 29513/1 and II. Obituary in Tanganyika Notes and Records, 52 (1959), 1–3.Google Scholar Rumour has it he was the brother of Alfred Hitchcock, the film-maker.

49 Minute by Monson, 22 Dec., and Clauson to Jackson, 28 Dec. 1944, CO 852/609/4. Stahl, , Colonial Trade, 269–272.Google Scholar

50 Correspondence and minutes in CO 852/609/4, 5 and 6.

51 TSGA meetings, 1944–5, TNA 29513/1 and II; Tanganyika, , The Sisal Industry Ordinance, 1945.Google Scholar

52 ‘Report of the joint marketing committee to the members of the Tanganyika and Kenya sisal growers’ associations’ (March 1948)Google Scholar; printed copy in the University Library, Dar es Salaam (hereafter Report of JMC).

53 J.M.C. meeting with C.O. and B.o.T., 16 Sept. 1947, Report of JMC p. 35.

54 ibid. and minute by Miller, 6 April 1948, TNA 16682/1/154.

55 ‘Minority Report submitted by Mr J. H. S. Tranter’, Report of JMC, p. 84. Creech Jones to Battershill, 12 July 1948 (enclosing record of C.O. meeting with merchants on 11 May), TNA 16682/1/220. Wigglesworth, A., The Future of the Sisal Industry in East Africa (London, 1946Google Scholar; kindly lent me by Mr Leslie).

56 Melville to Surridge, 11 July 1947, and Melville to Sandford, 24 April 1948, TNA 16682/1/77 and 173.

57 Minute by Miller, 6 April 1948, and Leslie to Lockhart, 30 June 1947, TNA 16682/1/31 and 154.

58 CS Tanganyika to C.O., 20 and 26 April 1948, TNA 16682/1/166.

59 TSGA Special meetings, 30 March and 31 May 1948, TNA 29513/111/204 and 213.

60 Yoshida, M., ‘Agricultural marketing reorganization in postwar East Africa’, The Developing Economies XI:3 (1973), 252.Google Scholar Material in CO 852/1165/1 (1950).

61 TSGA to CS, 10 July 1948, TNA 16682/1/218.

62 Little remains of the extravagances of the sisal barons in those years except a few municipal halls and a lot of anecdotes.