Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:18:20.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Evaluation of U.S. Hog Producer Preferences Toward Autonomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Jeffrey M. Gillespie ,
Christopher G. Davis  and
Noro C. Rahelizatovo
Jeffrey M. Gillespie
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA
Christopher G. Davis
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
Noro C. Rahelizatovo
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hog farmers' preferences for autonomy are assessed through the use of eight questions dealing with their preferences for general decision making and with respect to specific management actions. Farmers generally preferred to make a higher percentage of the decisions about their operations, especially older producers and those who operated farrowing units. Farmers who placed lower values on autonomy finished hogs, were nearing retirement, valued social relationships with other farmers more highly, had higher off-farm income, or were larger farmers.

Keywords

Autonomycontractingpork productionutilityQ12L14D21
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , December 2004 , pp. 575 - 590
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basarir, A. “Multidimensional Goals of Farmers in the Beef Cattle and Dairy Industries.” Ph.D. dissertation, Louisiana State University, June 2002.Google Scholar
Boehlje, M. “Alternative Models of Structural Change in Agriculture and Related Industries.” Agribusiness 8(1992):219–31.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, C.G. “Factors Affecting the Selection of Business Arrangements by Hog Farmers in the United States.” Ph.D. dissertation, Louisiana State University, July 2002.Google Scholar
Dillman, D.A. “The Design and Administration of Mail Surveys.” Annual Review of Sociology 17(1991):225–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eden, D. “Self-Employed Workers: A Comparison Group for Organizational Psychology.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 9(1973):186–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulton, J., and Gillespie, J.. “Emerging Business Organizations in a Rapidly Changing Pork Industry.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(December 1995):1219–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, J.M. “The Effect of Risk and Autonomy on Hog Producers' Contracting Decisions.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, October 1993.Google Scholar
Gillespie, J.M., and Eidman, V.R.. “The Effect of Risk and Autonomy on Independent Hog Producers' Contracting Decisions.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 30(July 1998):175–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W.H.Econometric Analysis, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2000.Google Scholar
Grey, M.A. “‘Those Bastards Can Go to Hell!’: Small-Farmer Resistance to Vertical Integration and Concentration in the Pork Industry.” Human Organization 59(Summer 2000):169–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hundley, G. “Why and When Are the Self-Employed More Satisfied with Their Work?” Industrial Relations 40(2001):293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C.S., and Foster, K.A.. “Risk Preferences and Contracting in the U.S. Hog Industry.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 26(1994):393–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J.A. “How Satisfied Are the Self-Employed: A Secondary Analysis Approach.” Entrepre-neurship Theory and Practice 17(1993):35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, P.J. “Franchising and the Choice of Self-Employment.” Journal of Business Venturing 14(1999):345–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeney, R.L., and Raiffa, H.. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kliebenstein, J.B., Barrett, D.A., Hefferman, W.D., and Kirtley, C.L.. “An Analysis of Farmers' Perceptions of Benefits Received from Farming.” North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics 2(1980):131–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, J.D., Grimes, G., and Hayenga, M.. “Production and Marketing Characteristics of U.S. Pork Producers, 1997-1998.” Staff Paper No. 311, Dept. of Econ., Iowa State University, 1998.Google Scholar
Paarlberg, D.American Farm Policy. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1964.Google Scholar
Robison, L.J., and Hanson, S.D.. “Social Capital and Economic Cooperation.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 27(July 1995):43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenheuvel, A., and Wooden, M.. “Self-Employed Contractors and Job Satisfaction.” Journal of Small Business Management 35(1997):11–20.Google Scholar
Weaver, C.N., and Franz, R.S.. “Work-Related Attitudes of Entrepreneurs, Public and Private Employees.” Psychological Reports 70(1992):387–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H.Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1994.Google Scholar