Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:15:15.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Implications of Discontinuing the Texas High Plains Boll Weevil Suppression Program*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Ronald D. Lacewell ,
James L. Larson ,
D. G. Bottrell ,
D. R. Rummel  and
Ray V. Billingsley
Ronald D. Lacewell
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
James L. Larson
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
D. G. Bottrell
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Lubbock
D. R. Rummel
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Lubbock
Ray V. Billingsley
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The federal government has supported and continues to support or share in the support, financially and technically, of several regional pest management programs. Implicit in continued federal support is the concept that the benefits of the program to society exceed the governmental portion of the costs. As these programs are evaluated and consideration is given to discontinuing federal support, improved estimates of program benefits, or costs of discontinuing, are needed.

The objective of this study was to identify and quantify the expected effects in terms of agricultural output, insecticide use, and production costs of discontinuing a regional boll weevil suppression program on the Texas High Plains. Results of this study are useful to governmental decision makers, local producers, environmentalists and economists.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , December 1974 , pp. 33 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Article No. 11311. This publication was supported in part by the National Science Foundation and the Environmental Protection Agency, through a grant (NSF GB-34718) to the University of California. The work was in cooperation with ARS-USDA and funded in part under USDA Coop. Agr. No. 12-14-100-11, 194(33). The findings, opinions, and recommendations expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the University of California, the National Science Foundation or the Environmental Protection Agency. Data and suggestions by Roy Moritz, J.C. Hatchett, Ed Dean, John Thomas, Ray Frisky, and three unidentified reviewers significantly improved the study and manuscript.

References

[1]Adkisson, P. L., Davis, J.W., Owen, W.L., and Rummel, D.R.. Evaluation of the 1964 Diapause Boll Weevil Control Program on the High Plains of Texas. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Department of Entomology Technical Report 65-1, 1965.Google Scholar
[2]Adkisson, P. L., Rummel, D.R., Sterling, W.L., and Owen, W.L.. Diapause Boll Weevil Control: A Comparison of Two Methods. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 1054, 1966.Google Scholar
[3]Bottrell, D.G., Rummel, D.R., and Adkisson, P. L.. “Spread of the Boll Weevil into the High Plains of Texas.” Environmental Entomology, 1:136–140, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Lacewell, Ronald D.; Bottrell, D.G., Billingsley, Ray V., Rummel, D.R., and Larson, James L.. Texas High Plains Reproductive Diapause Boll Weevil Control Program: Preliminary Estimate of Impact. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Miscellaneous Publication, in press, 1974.Google Scholar
[5]Strickland, P. L., and Lynn Harwell, R.. Selected U.S. Crop Budgets: Yields, Inputs and Variable Costs, Volume V - South Central Region. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, ERS-461 April 1971.Google Scholar
[6]Texas Agricultural Extension Service. Texas Crop Budgets. Texas A&M University, MP-1024, 1972.Google Scholar
[7]Texas Dept. of Agriculture. Texas Cotton Statistics. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Statistical Reporting Service, 1969, 1970, 1971.Google Scholar