Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T08:27:41.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring the Quality of Imported Tobacco

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

George C. Davis  and
William J. Hewitt
George C. Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
William J. Hewitt
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, the University of Tennessee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Domestic tobacco producers have faced increasing competition from imported tobacco since the late 1970s. Much of the debate has centered on the unknown quality of imported tobacco. This study provides a discussion and clarification of the concept of quality, and demonstrates a method of measuring the average quality of imported tobacco. The results show that since 1977, imported tobacco has been steadily decreasing in average quality and moving toward lower quality producing countries and types of tobacco. The reasons for this decline are discussed along with the policy implications.

Keywords

index numbersqualitytobacco
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , July 1996 , pp. 148 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aw, B. W., and Roberts, M. J.. “Estimating Quality Change in Quota-Constrained Import Markets: The Case of U.S. Footwear” J. Internat. Econ. 21(1986):45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, B., and Johnson, P. R.. “Standards Applicable to Flue-Cured Leaf from Start of On-Farm Preparation for Sale Until Time to ‘Break the Sale.’” In The U.S. Tobacco Marketing System, ed., Marshall, J. P.. Proceedings of a symposium sponsored by the Multi-State, Inter-Belt Tobacco and Marketing Cost Study Committee. Dept. of Agr. and Appi. Econ., VPI and State University, Blacksburg VA, August 1989.Google Scholar
Bickers, C. “The 75% Domestic Content Law.” Tobacco International 196,4(1 March 1994):16–21.Google Scholar
Chinloy, P. “Sources of Quality Change in Labor Input” Amer. Econ. Rev. 70(1980):108–19.Google Scholar
Diewert, W. E. “Aggregation Problems in the Measure of Capital.” In Essays in the Theory and Measurement of Consumer Behavior in the Honor of Sir Richard Stone, ed., Deaton, A., pp. 163–208. London: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Doolittle, D. E. “Blind Justice or Blind Policy?” Tobacco Reporter 120,10(October 1993):22–26.Google Scholar
Grise, V. “The World Tobacco Market: Government Intervention and Multilateral Reform.” Staff Rep., U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington DC, February 1990.Google Scholar
Grise, V., and Griffin, K.. “The U.S. Tobacco Industry.” Agr. Econ. Rep. No. 589, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, September 1988.Google Scholar
Hanemann, M. “Quality and Demand Analysis.” In New Directions in Econometric Modeling and Forecasting in U.S. Agriculture, ed., Rausser, G. C., Chap. 3. New York: North-Holland, 1982.Google Scholar
Houthakker, H. S. “Compensating Changes in Quantities and Qualities Consumed” Rev. Econ. Stud. 19(1952):155–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. The Economics of the Tobacco Industry. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1984.Google Scholar
Lancaster, K. Modern Consumption Theory. Brookfield VT: Edward Elgar, 1991.Google Scholar
Pompelli, G., and Pick, D.. “Passthrough of Exchange Rates and Tariffs in Br'azil-U.S. Tobacco Trade” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 72(1992):676–81.Google Scholar
Snell, W., Palmer, G., and Duncan, G.. “Marketing U.S. Burley in the 1990s to Meet Changing Consumer Demand: Can the U.S. Burley Tobacco Industry Remain Competitive and Sustain Profitability?” In The Marketing of U.S.-Produced Tobacco: Burley and Flue-Cured, ed., Marshall, J. P., pp. 65–89. Proceedings of a symposium sponsored by the Multi-State, Inter-Belt Tobacco and Marketing Cost Study Committee. Dept. of Agr. and Appi. Econ., VPI and State University, Blacksburg VA, December 1992.Google Scholar
Theil, H. “Qualities, Prices, and Budget Enquiries” Rev. Econ. Stud. 19(1952):129–47.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. U.S. Imports for Consumption and General Imports: FT246 and FT247. USBC, Washington DC. Annual Reports, 1977–1993.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Tobacco Situation and Outlook Report. USDA/Economic Research Service, Washington DC. Various Issues, 1977–1994.Google Scholar