Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:28:22.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nonconstant Price Expectations and Acreage Response: The Case of Cotton Production in Georgia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Scott D. Parrott  and
Christopher S. McIntosh
Scott D. Parrott
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Tennessee
Christopher S. McIntosh
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An adaptive regression model is used to examine the relative importance of cash and government support prices in determining cotton production over time. The results show that the cash price is more important as a source of price information for cotton producers than the government program price. The cash price was shown to have a greater influence on acreage response in every year, including periods thought to be dominated by government commodity programs.

Keywords

adaptive regressioncotton acreage responseprice expectations
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , July 1996 , pp. 203 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahrendsen, B. L. “A Structural Approach to Estimating Rate of Return Expectations of Farmers.” J. Agr. and Appi. Econ. 25,2(1993):56–68.Google Scholar
Antonovitz, F., and Green, R.. “Alternative Estimates of Fed Beef Supply Response to Risk” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 72(1990):475–87.Google Scholar
Askari, H., and Cummings, J. T.. “Estimating Agricultural Supply Response with the Nerlove Model: A Survey” Internat. Econ. Rev. 18(1977):257–92.Google Scholar
Chavas, J.-P., Pope, R. D., and Kao, R. S.. “An Analysis of the Role of Futures Prices, Cash Prices, and Government Programs in Acreage Response” West. J. Agr. Econ. 8(1983):27–33.Google Scholar
Cooley, T. F., and Prescott, E. C.. “An Adaptive Regression Model” Internat. Econ. Rev. 14(1973a): 364–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooley, T. F., and Prescott, E. C.. “Estimation in the Presence of Stochastic Parameter Variation” Econometrica 44(1976): 167–84.Google Scholar
Cooley, T. F., and Prescott, E. C.. “Systematic (Non-Random) Variation Models Varying Parameter Regression: A Theory and Some Applications” Ann. Econ. and Social Measure. 2(1973b): 463–73.Google Scholar
Duffy, P. A., Richardson, J.W., and Wohlgenant, M. K.. “Regional Cotton Acreage Response.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 19(1987): 99–108.Google Scholar
Gardner, B. L. “Futures Prices in Supply Analysis” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 58(1976): 81–84.Google Scholar
Houck, J. P., Abel, M. E., Ryan, M. E., Gallagher, P. W., Hoffman, R. G., and Penn, J. B.. “Analyzing the Impact of Government Programs on Crop Acreage.” Tech. Bull. No. 1548, USDA/Agricultural Research Service, Washington DC, August 1976.Google Scholar
Lee, D. R., and Helmberger, P. G.. “Estimating Supply Response in the Presence of Farm Programs” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 67(1985): 193–203.Google Scholar
McIntosh, C. S. “Specification of Government Policy Variables for Feed Grains, Wheat, Soybeans, Rice, Cotton, Peanuts, Tobacco, Sugar Beets, and Milk, 1950–86.” Faculty Series FS89-61, Dept. of Agr. Econ., University of Georgia, 1989.Google Scholar
McIntosh, C. S., and Shideed, K. H.. “The Effect of Government Programs on Acreage Response over Time: The Case of Corn Production in Iowa” West. J. Agr. Econ. 14(1989):38–44.Google Scholar
McIntosh, C. S., and Shumway, C. R.. “Evaluating Alternative Price Expectations Models for Multiproduct Supply Analysis” Agr. Econ. 10(1994): 1–11.Google Scholar
Morzuch, B. J., Weaver, R. D., and Helmberger, P. G.. “Wheat Acreage Supply Response Under Changing Government Programs.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 62 (1980):29–37.Google Scholar
Nerlove, M. “Estimates of the Elasticities of Supply of Selected Agricultural Commodities” J. Farm Econ. 38(1956):496–509.Google Scholar
Orazem, P., and Miranowski, J.. “An Indirect Test for the Specification of Expectations Regimes.” Rev. Econ. and Statis. 68(1986):603–09.Google Scholar
Pope, R. D. “Supply Response and the Dispersion of Price Expectations.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 63(1981): 161–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romain, R. F. J. “A Commodity-Specific Simulation Model for U.S. Agriculture.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University, 1983.Google Scholar
Shideed, K. H., and White, F. C.. “Alternative Forms of Price Expectations in Supply Analysis for U.S. Corn and Soybean Acreages.” West. J. Agr. Econ. 14 (1989):281–92.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Statistical Reporting Service. Agricultural Prices. Washington DC: Government Printing Office. Various issues, 1957–1991.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Statistical Reporting Service. Agricultural Statistics. Washington DC: Government Printing Office. Various issues, 1949–1991.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Statistical Reporting Service. Georgia Agricultural Facts. Athens GA: Georgia Crop Reporting Service. Various issues, 1950–1990.Google Scholar
Ward, R. W., and Meyers, L. H.. “Advertising Effectiveness and Coefficient Variation over Time” Agr. Econ. Res. 31(1990)1–8.Google Scholar