Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:24:59.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: The Economics of Animal Welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Darren Hudson
Darren Hudson*
Affiliation:
Larry Combest Chair of Agricultural Competitiveness, Texas Tech University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This discussion highlights some of the strengths and weaknesses of the literature on animal welfare. Most pointedly, the literature on the economics of animal welfare is quite scant. As exemplified by these papers, however, there is a growing body of literature, especially those related to added costs of production and consumer demand for animal welfare attributes.

Keywords

animal welfarecost estimateswillingness to payconsumer researchQ13Q16Q18
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , August 2010 , pp. 453 - 455
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hudson, D. “Why Buy Brie? What Are We Measuring with Willingness to Pay for Geographic Indicators.” Presented to the INRA Conference Geographic Indicators and Brands: Firm Strategies and Public Policy, June 2007, Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
Olynk, N., Tonsor, G., and Wolf, C. “Verifying Credence Attributes in Livestock Production.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 42(2010):439–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, D., Matthews, W., Mench, J., and Rosen-Molina, J. “The Economics of Regulation on Hen Housing in California.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 42(2010):429–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonsor, G., and Wolf, C. “Drivers of Resident Support for Animal Care Oriented Ballot Initiatives.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 42(2010):419–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar