Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T03:20:51.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Antibiotics Reduce Production Risk for U.S. PorkProducers?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Xuanli Liu ,
Gay Y. Miller  and
Paul E. McNamara
Xuanli Liu
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Station, Fort Valley State University, Fort Valley, GA
Gay Y. Miller
Affiliation:
Departments of Veterinary Pathobiology, Veterinary Clinical Medicine, and Agricultural and Consumer Economics
Paul E. McNamara
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois, Urbana–Champaign, IL
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We combine econometric and financial analyses of the NAHMS 2000 Swine Surveydata to examine whether evidence exists for reducing risk by usingantibiotics for growth promotion (AGP) in the U.S. swine industry. Astochastic dominance analysis of alternative lengths of time (days) of AGPapplication reveals that AGP used in the range of 65–75 days is preferred byrisk-averse producers. Risk is reduced and profits are increased from use ofAGP. The combined impacts of increased average daily gain and decreasedvariability in pig live weight increase producer profits by $2.99 per pigmarketed.

Keywords

antibioticsgrowth promotionpigsriskstochastic dominancevariabilityD21D61D81Q12R32
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , December 2005 , pp. 565 - 575
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J.R., Dillon, J.L., and Hardaker, J.B.. Agricultural Decision Analysis. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Boland, M.A. “Economic Optimization of Animal Replacement, Ration Composition, and Nutrient Management: An Application to Pork Production.” Ph.D. dissertation, Purdue University, 1996.Google Scholar
Cromwell, G.L. “Why and How Antibiotics Are Used in Swine Production.” Animal Biotechnology 13(2002):7–27.Google Scholar
Dillon, J.L. The Analysis of Response in Crop and Livestock Production. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Gollier, C. and Pratt, J.W.. “Risk Vulnerability and the Tempering Effect of Background Risk.” Econometrica 64(1996): 1109–23.Google Scholar
Hardaker, J.B., Huirne, R.B.M., and Anderson, J.R.. Coping with Risk in Agriculture. New York: CAB International, 1997.Google Scholar
Hayes, D.J., Jensen, H.H., Backstrom, L., and J.E Fabiosa. “Economic Impact of a Ban on the Use of Over-the-Counter Antibiotics in U.S. Swine Rations.” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 4(2001):81–97.Google Scholar
Hays, V.W. Effectiveness of Feed Additive Usage of Antibacterial Agents in Swine and Poultry Production. Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, Washington, DC., 1977.Google Scholar
Hocking, R.R. “The Analysis and Selection of Variables in Linear Regression.” Biometrics, 32(1976): 1–49.Google Scholar
Judge, G.G., Griffiths, W. E., Hill, R. C., and Lee, T.C.. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1980.Google Scholar
Just, R.E. “Risk Aversion under Profit Maximization.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 57 (1975):347–52.Google Scholar
Kliebenstein, J.B., and Lawrence, J.D.. “Contracting and Vertical Coordination in the United States Pork Industry.” Staff Paper No. 265, Iowa State University, Department of Economics, 1995.Google Scholar
Lapan, H., and Moschini, G.. “Futures Hedging under Price, Basis, and Production Risk.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76,3(1994):465–77.Google Scholar
Losinger, W.C. “Feed-Conversion Ratio of Finisher Pigs in the USA.” Preview of Veterinary Medicine 36(1998):287–305.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. “Two-Moment Decision Models and Expected Utility Maximization.” American Economic Review, 77(1987):421–30.Google Scholar
Miller, G.Y., Song, Y., and Bahnson, P.B.. “An Economic Model for Estimating Batch Finishing System Profitability with an Application in Estimating the Impact of Preventive Measures for Porcine Respiratory Disease Complex.” Journal of Swine Health and Production 9(2001): 169–77.Google Scholar
Miller, G.Y., Algozin, K.A., McNamara, P.E. and Bush, E.J.. “Productivity and Economic Impacts of Feedgrade Antibiotic Use in Pork Production.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 12(2003):469–82.Google Scholar
Miller, G.Y., Liu, X., McNamara, P.E. and Bush, E.J.. “Producer incentives for antibiotic use in U.S. pork production.” Journal of Agribusiness, 23(2005): 147–162.Google Scholar
PigCHAMP®. Benchmarking in Swine Herds. Regents of the University of Minnesota, p. 90. 1999.Google Scholar
Sahn, D.E., and Stifel, D.C.. “Robust Comparisons of Malnutrition in Developing Countries.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(2002):716–35.Google Scholar
Song, Y.H., and Miller, G.Y.. “Effects of Marketing Decisions on Net Present Value of Pork Production for Independent and Allied Swine Producers.” Review of Agricultural Economics, 24,1 (Spring/Summer 2002):181–95.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Livestock, Meat, and Wool Weekly Summary and Statistics. Livestock and Seed Division, Agricultural Marketing Service, United States Department of Agriculture, January-December 1995.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Hog Costs and Return Data. Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, September, 2000. Internet site: http://ers.usda.gov/data/FarmIncome/car/hogs3.htm (Accessed May 13, 2003).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics 2003. National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2003. Internet site: http://www.usda.gov/nass/pubs/agr03/acro03.htm (Accessed August 15, 2003).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Animal Health Monitoring System. Part 1: Reference of Swine Health and Management in the United States, 2000, August 2001.Google Scholar
Wallace, T.D. “Pretest Estimation in Regression: A Survey.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59(1977):431–43.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D.R. “Role of Subtherapeutic Levels of Antimicrobial in Pig Production.” Journal of Animal Science 62(Suppl. 3, 1986):6–17.Google Scholar