Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:40:39.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Implications of the 1973 Farm Program on Wheat and Beef Production – Southern High Plains Winter Wheat Area*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Robert E. Whitson ,
Ronald D. Lacewell ,
Lonnie L. Jones  and
John Shipley
Robert E. Whitson
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Ronald D. Lacewell
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Lonnie L. Jones
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
John Shipley
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Interrelationships among enterprises on individual farms complicates decision-making by the individual producers and efforts to estimate producer response to alternative farm programs. This is especially true for wheat producers, where wheat both competes with other field crops and can be used for grazing (an input to beef production). Acreage allocated to wheat provides little indication of the quantity of wheat grain that will be produced since stockers may be withdrawn from grazing wheat throughout the production period. Wheat output is determined by length of grazing. With sufficiently attractive cattle prices, relative to wheat prices, wheat may be used only for graze-out (no grain harvested). The actual outcome depends primarily on price of wheat, price of beef and the characteristics of the government wheat program.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , December 1973 , pp. 37 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Article No. 10511

References

[1]Helmers, G. A. and Lagrone, W. F., “Wheat and Feed Grains in the Great Plains and Northwest: Supply Response and Resource Use,” Great Plains Agricultural Council Publication No. 37, April, 1970.Google Scholar
[2]Shipley, John, “Economic Alternatives With Grazing Irrigated Wheat,” Presented at Symposium on Grazing Small Grains, Aug. 1, 1972, U. S. Department of Agriculture Southwestern Great Plains Research Center at Bushland, Texas, 1972.Google Scholar
[3]Shipley, John, “Irrigating Wheat for Forage and Grain Production,” Presented at Symposium on Grazing Small Grains, Aug. 5, 1971, U. S. Department of Agriculture Southwestern Great Plains Research Center at Bushland, Texas, 1971.Google Scholar
[4]Telephone communication with Oklahoma Crop and Livestock Reporting Service U. S. Department of Agriculture, Statistical Reporting Service, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
[5]Texas Department of Agriculture, Texas Small Grain Statistics, 1972, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
[6]Tweeten, Luther G., “Commodity Programs for Agriculture,” Agricultural Policy: A Review of Programs and Needs, National Advisory Commission on Food and Fiber, Vol. V, Technical Papers, Aug. 1967.Google Scholar
[7] “U. S. Department of Agriculture Eliminates Required Set-Aside from 1973 Wheat Program: Lifts Grazing Ban,” Press Release, Washington, D.C., Jan. 10, 1973.Google Scholar
[8]U. S. Department of Agriculture, Wheat Situation, Economic Research Service, Feb. 1973.Google Scholar
[9]U. S. Department of Agriculture, “1973 Wheat Programs,” Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service Leaflet, Aug. 1972.Google Scholar
[10]Whitson, Robert E., et. al., “Economic Analysis of Irrigated Wheat Stocker Grazing Alternatives in the Northern High Plains of Texas,” (Forthcoming Texas Agri. Exp. Stat. Publication).Google Scholar