Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Bark, R.H.
Osgood, D.E.
Colby, B.G.
Katz, G.
and
Stromberg, J.
2009.
Habitat preservation and restoration: Do homebuyers have preferences for quality habitat?.
Ecological Economics,
Vol. 68,
Issue. 5,
p.
1465.
Thurston, Hale
Schrecongost, Alyse
and
Heberling, Matthew
2009.
Environmental Economics for Watershed Restoration.
p.
15.
Dasgupta, Partha
2009.
The Welfare Economic Theory of Green National Accounts.
Environmental and Resource Economics,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 1,
p.
3.
Polasky, Stephen
and
Segerson, Kathleen
2009.
Integrating Ecology and Economics in the Study of Ecosystem Services: Some Lessons Learned.
Annual Review of Resource Economics,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 1,
p.
409.
Bin, Okmyung
Landry, Craig E.
and
Meyer, Gregory F.
2009.
Riparian Buffers and Hedonic Prices: A Quasi‐Experimental Analysis of Residential Property Values in the Neuse River Basin.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics,
Vol. 91,
Issue. 4,
p.
1067.
Hodgkinson, Ann
and
Valadkhani, Abbas
2009.
Community Valuations of Environmental Quality in Coastal Lakes: Lake Illawarra Case Study*.
Economic Papers: A journal of applied economics and policy,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 2,
p.
155.
Boyd, James William
and
Krupnick, Alan
2009.
The Definition and Choice of Environmental Commodities for Nonmarket Valuation.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Dasgupta, Partha
2010.
Handbooks in Economics.
Vol. 5,
Issue. ,
p.
4977.
OKUYAMA, Tadahiro
2012.
MEASURING ADDITIONAL ACCSESS FEES BASED ON ENVIRONMENRAL DEGRATIONS: A CASE OF WETLANDS IN HOKKAIDO, JAPAN.
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. G (Environmental Research),
Vol. 68,
Issue. 6,
p.
II_207.
Boyd, James
and
Krupnick, Alan
2013.
Using Ecological Production Theory to Define and Select Environmental Commodities for Nonmarket Valuation.
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Mazzotta, Marisa
Besedin, Elena
and
Speers, Ann
2014.
A Meta-Analysis of Hedonic Studies to Assess the Property Value Effects of Low Impact Development.
Resources,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 1,
p.
31.
Cohen, Jeffrey P.
Cromley, Robert G.
and
Banach, Kevin T.
2015.
Are Homes Near Water Bodies and Wetlands Worth More or Less? An Analysis of Housing Prices in One Connecticut Town.
Growth and Change,
Vol. 46,
Issue. 1,
p.
114.
Kriesel, Warren P.
2016.
Are Some Natural Amenities as Good as Gold? Evidence from Coastal Real Estate and Marshlands.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Suparman, Yusep
Folmer, Henk
and
Oud, Johan H.L.
2016.
The willingness to pay for in‐house piped water in urban and rural Indonesia.
Papers in Regional Science,
Vol. 95,
Issue. 2,
p.
407.
Bonetti, Federico
Corsi, Stefano
Orsi, Luigi
and
De Noni, Ivan
2016.
Canals vs. Streams: To What Extent Do Water Quality and Proximity Affect Real Estate Values? A Hedonic Approach Analysis.
Water,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 12,
p.
577.
Nepal, Mani
Karki Nepal, Apsara
and
Berrens, Robert P.
2017.
Where gathering firewood matters: Proximity and forest management effects in hedonic pricing models for rural Nepal.
Journal of Forest Economics,
Vol. 27,
Issue. ,
p.
28.
Trenholm, Ryan
Haider, Wolfgang
Lantz, Van
Knowler, Duncan
and
Haegeli, Pascal
2017.
Landowner preferences for wetlands conservation programs in two Southern Ontario watersheds.
Journal of Environmental Management,
Vol. 200,
Issue. ,
p.
6.
Wang, Haoying
2017.
Market Response to Flood Risk: An Empirical Study of Housing Values Using Boundary Discontinuities.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Liou, Je‐Liang
Randall, Alan
Wu, Pei‐Ing
and
Chen, Han‐Huei
2019.
Monetarizing Spillover Effects of Soil and Groundwater Contaminated Sites in Taiwan: How Much More Will People Pay for Housing to Avoid Contamination?.
Asian Economic Journal,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 1,
p.
67.
Bose, Satyajit
Dong, Guo
and
Simpson, Anne
2019.
The Financial Ecosystem.
p.
137.