Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:50:17.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foreign Economic Development: The Need and How Well It Is Being Met

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Ralph K. Davidson
Ralph K. Davidson*
Affiliation:
The Rockefeller Foundation
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Today, the need for economic development is self-evident to the millions of people in Asia, Africa and Latin America who suffer from malnutrition, are ill-housed, poorly educated, and either unemployed or grossly underemployed. The ultimate objective of economic development is to raise the standard of life – the quality of life - for the mass of the people, to widen their area of choice, to open up new opportunities for human well-being. The less developed countries have two-thirds of the 3.5 billion people but receive only 12.5 percent of the world's gross national product. Life appears to be an economic treadmill with the future blighted by an excessive rate of population growth for millions of people. India provides a good illustration of the problem. With an estimated population of 525 million at mid-1968, India had 15 percent of the world's population, 2.4 percent of the world's land area, hardly 2 percent of the world's income, and an annual per capita income level of around $75.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , December 1970 , pp. 53 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Agency for International Development, Statistics and Reports Division, Gross National Product, pp. 6–11, Washington, D. C., April 25, 1969.Google Scholar
2. Bose, S. R. and Clark, E. H. II “Some Basic Considerations on Agricultural Mechanization in West Pakistan,” The Pakistan Development Review, pp. 273–308, Autumn, 1969.Google Scholar
3. Consortium for the Study of Nigerian Rural Development, Strategies and Recommendations for Nigerian Rural Development, 1969/1985, pp. 1–17, CSNRD 33, East Lansing, 1969.Google Scholar
4. Deane, P. and Cole, W. A., British Economic Growth, 1688-1959, pp. 283–285, Cambridge, England, 1962.Google Scholar
5. Hayami, Yujiro, “Green Revolution in Historical Perspective: The Experience of Japan, Taiwan and Korea,” unpublished paper, Dept. of Ag. Econ., University of Minnesota. Google Scholar
6. Hirschman, Albert O., New York Times, p. 16, Dec. 30, 1969.Google Scholar
7. Johnson, Harry G., Economic Policies Toward Less Developed Countries, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 1967.Google Scholar
8. Johnston, B. F. and Cownie, J., ‘The Seed-Fertilizer Revolution and Labor Force Absorption,” American Econ. Review, p. 59 and pp. 569–582, Sept. 1969.Google Scholar
9. McNamara, Robert S., “Address to the Board of Governors,” World Bank, pp. 13–22, Washington, D. C., Sept. 29,1969.Google Scholar
10. Oshima, Harry T., “Growth and Unemployment in Postwar Asia, in the Structure and Development in Asia Economies,” Proceedings of a conference held by Japan Economic Research Center, Sept., 1968, The Japan Economic Research Center, Tokyo, 1968.Google Scholar
11. Sicat, Gerado P., ‘Economic Progress in South Korea and Taiwan: Lessons for the Philippines,” pp. 4–77, Institute of Economic Development and Research Discussion Paper, Oct. 27, 1969.Google Scholar
12. Streeter, Carroll P., “A Partnership to Improve Food Production in India,” pp. 3, 4, 109 and 125, New York: Rockefeller Foundation, 1969.Google Scholar
13. The Economist, “Green Revolution or Red?” p. 9, London: Dec. 27, 1969.Google Scholar
14. The Pearson Commission, “Partners in Development,” pp. 3, 24, 33, 52, 53, 58 and 360, New York: Praeger, 1969.Google Scholar
15. United Nations, report in New York Times, Dec. 28, 1969.Google Scholar
16. World Bank, Annual Report 1969, pp. 34, 36 and 46, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar