Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T16:39:43.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Higher Education Costs and the Production of Extension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2005

David N. Laband  and
Bernard F. Lentz
David N. Laband
Affiliation:
Forest Policy Center, School of Forestry & Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL
Bernard F. Lentz
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Do cost considerations justify the current structure of production of extension services in which one or more providers exists in virtually all of the contiguous U.S. states? Provision of extension services has sizable cost implications for the host institutions. Yet, to our knowledge, there has been virtually no analysis of the impact of extension on higher education costs. Using academic year 1995–1996 data, we estimate a multiproduct cost function for 1,445 public institutions of higher education in the United States, including 65 that provide extension services. We find evidence of significant economies of scale with respect to the provision of extension services but no evidence of significant economies of scope between the provision of extension and the production of research, undergraduate education, or graduate education.

Keywords

costsextension serviceshigher educationmultiproduct cost functionI22L89
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , April 2005 , pp. 229 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumol, W.J., Panzar, J.C., and Willig, R.D.. Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982.Google Scholar
Birkhaeuser, D., Evenson, R.E., and Feder, G.. “The Economic Impact of Agricultural Extension: A Review.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 39(April 1991):607–50.10.1086/451893Google Scholar
Cohn, E., Rhine, S.L.W., and Santos, M.C.. “Institutions of Higher Education as Multi-product Firms: Economies of Scale and Scope.” Review of Economics and Statistics 71(1989):284–90.10.2307/1926974Google Scholar
Dinar, A. “Provision and Request of Agricultural Extension Services.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71(May 1989):294–302.10.2307/1241586Google Scholar
Dinar, A. “Extension Commercialization: How Much to Charge for Extension Services.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(February 1992): 1–12.Google Scholar
Huffman, W.E. “Assessing Returns to Agricultural Extension.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 60(December 1978):969–75.10.2307/1240130Google Scholar
Huffman, W.E., and Just, R.E.. “Funding, Structure, and Management of Public Agricultural Research in the United States.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(November 1994):744–59.10.2307/1243736Google Scholar
Ingram, P. “The United Kingdom Experience in the Privatization of Extension.” Public and Private Roles in Agricultural Development, Proceedings of the Twelfth Agricultural Sector Symposium, Anderson, J.R. and de Haan, C., eds., pp. 51–58. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1992.Google Scholar
Just, R.E., and Huffman, W.E.. “Economic Principles and Incentives: Structure, Management, and Funding of Agricultural Research in the United States.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74(December 1992): 1101–08.10.2307/1242764Google Scholar
Laband, D.N., and Lentz, B.F.. “New Estimates of Economies of Scale and Scope in Higher Education.” Southern Economic Journal 70,1 (July 2003): 172–83.10.2307/1061638Google Scholar
LeGouis, M. “Alternative Financing of Agricultural Extension: Recent Trends and Implications for the Future.” Agricultural Extension: Worldwide Institutional Evolution and Forces for Change, chap. 6, Rivera, W.M. and Gustafson, D.J., eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1991.Google Scholar
Schuh, G.E. “Privatization of Agricultural Research at Land Grant Universities.” Emerging Agricultural Technologies: Issues for the 1990's. Washington, DC: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, 1992.Google Scholar
Scwartz, L.A., and Zijp, W.. “Public and Private Roles in Delivery of Extension Services.” Public and Private Sector Roles in the Provision of Agricultural Support Services. Proceedings of the World Bank International Symposium, San Jose, Costa Rica, 17-19 May 1993. Washington D.C.: The World Bank, 1994.Google Scholar
Toutkoushian, R.K. “The Value of Cost Functions for Policymaking and Institutional Research,” Research in Higher Education 40,1(1999): 1–15.10.1023/A:1018718226489Google Scholar
Toutkoushian, R.K., Porter, S.R., Danielson, C., and Hollis, P.R.. “Using Publication Counts to Measure an Institution's Research Productivity,” Research in Higher Education 44,2(April 2003): 121–48.10.1023/A:1022070227966Google Scholar
White, E.C., and Havlicek, J. Jr. “Optimal Expenditures for Agricultural Research and Extension Implications of Underfunding.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64(February 1982):47–55.10.2307/1241171Google Scholar