Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:14:10.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of Local Labor Market Conditions on the Off-Farm Earnings of Farm Operators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

Lewell Gunter  and
Kevin T. McNamara
Lewell Gunter
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at theUniversity of Georgia, Athens, GA
Kevin T. McNamara
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at theUniversity of Georgia, Athens, GA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Local labor market characteristics are theoretically relevant to the determination of off-farm earnings of farm operators, but the empirical analysis of these effects has been hindered by a lack of appropriate data. This study employs the new census public use micro-data sample, PUMS-D, to investigate the effect of local labor market characteristics on off-farm earnings of farm operators. The PUMS-D data allow local characteristics to be defined on a labor market area basis, rather than on a political boundary basis. For a sample of Georgia farm operators, local labor market size, unemployment rates, and industrial structure were found to have significant impacts on off-farm employment and earnings.

Keywords

off-farm earningsfarm laborlabor marketsrural development
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , July 1990 , pp. 155 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bollman, R.D. “Off-Farm Work By Farmers: An Application of the Kinked Demand Curve for Labor.” Can. J. Agr. Econ., 27 (3) (1979):37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, W.T. and Lang, K.. “A Test of Dual Labor Market Theory.” Am. Econ. Rev., 75 (1985):792–805.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. LIMDEP, Version 5.1, New York, NY: Econometric Software, 1989.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. “Sample Selection Bias As A Specification Error.” Econometrica, 47 (1979): 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, W.E. “Farm and Off-Farm Work Decisions: The Role of Human Capital.” Rev. Econ. and Stat., 62 (1980): 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, T.G. “Off-Farm Employment of Small-Farm Operators: A Strategy for Survival.” Strategy for Survival of Small Farmers: International Implications. Williams, Thomas T., ed., Human Resources Development Center, Tuskegee Institute, 1985.Google Scholar
Judge, G. Griffiths, W., Hill, R., Luthkepohl, H., and Lee, T.C.. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1985.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Peter. A Guide To Econometrics. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Killingsworth, M. Labor Supply. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyson, T.A. “Entry Into Farming: Implications of A Dual Agricultural Structure.” Chapter 8 in Agricultural Change: Consequences of Southern Farms and Rural Communities. Molnar, Joseph J., ed., Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Maddala, G.S. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, W. and Kapitany, M.. “The Off-Farm Work Behavior of Farm Operators.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 65 (4) (1983):801–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, D.A. “The Off-Farm Labor Supply of Farmers.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 64 (3) (1982): 499–509.Google Scholar
Thurmeier, M. “The Determinants of Off-Farm Employment of Saskatchewan Farmers.” Can. J. Agr. Econ., 29 (3) (1981): 339–348.Google Scholar
Tolbert, C.M. and Killian, M.S.. Labor Market Areas for the United States. United States Department of Agriculture, ERS, ARED. Staff Report AGES 870721, August, 1987.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, National Economic Branch. Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector: Income and Balance Sheet Statistics, 1983, December, 1984.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Farm Sector Financial Problems: Another Perspective. AIB 499, May, 1986.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Census of Population and Housing, 1980: Public-Use Microdata Samples Technical Documentation. Bureau of the Census. Washington, DC, 1983.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1985. Washington, DC, 1984.Google Scholar