Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:14:53.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Information and Herd Health Management Practices in Texas Dairies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Wayne H. Howard ,
Thomas O. Knight ,
C. Richard Shumway ,
Robert W. Blake  and
Michael A. Tomaszewski
Wayne H. Howard
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Business, University of Guelph(formerly a Research Associate at Texas A&M University)
Thomas O. Knight
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
C. Richard Shumway
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
Robert W. Blake
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Cornell University
Michael A. Tomaszewski
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The dissemination of information by extension agents on dairy management practices used to control mastitis and the reception and use of that information by producers are investigated. Producers are surveyed to determine current practices used. The relationship between milk yield, somatic cell count, management practices, and producer and production characteristics is estimated. Subjective probabilities are elicited from “experts,” extension agents, and producers concerning the impact and cost of various management practices. Subjective marginal value products and marginal input costs are computed and compared for the respondent groups. Stochastic dominance is used to rank the relative importance of the practices as perceived by the respondents.

Keywords

informationdairy managementmastitissubjective probabilities
Type
Submitted Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , December 1987 , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asby, C. B., Ellis, P. R., Griffin, T. K., and Kingwill, R. G.. “The Benefits and Costs of a System of Mastitis Control in Individual Herds.” Unpublished mimeograph, University of Reading, Reading, England.Google Scholar
Bonnen, J. T. “Improving Information on Agriculture and Rural Life.” Amer. J. Agri. Econ., 57(1975):753–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caspari, J. A. “Fundamental Concepts of Information Theory.” Managerial Accounting, 49 (1968):8–10.Google Scholar
Chavas, J. P., and Pope, R. D.. “Information: Its Measurement and Valuation.” Amer. J. Agri. Econ., 66(1984):705–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dykhuizn, A. A., and Stelwagen, J.. “The Economic Significance of Mastitis in the Netherlands.” Netherlands Milk Dairy J., 36(1982):267–269.Google Scholar
Etgen, W. M., and Reaves, P. M.. Dairy Cattle Feeding and Management. Sixth Edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1978.Google Scholar
Gilmore, J. A. A Relationship of Milk Yield and Other Traits Measured Early in Life to a Dairy Cattle Profitability Model Including Health and Opportunity Costs. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 1977.Google Scholar
Griliches, Z. “Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technological Change.” Econometrica, 25(1957):501–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, S. J., and Stiglitz, E. J.. “Information and Competitive Price Systems.” Amer. Econ. Rev., 66(1976):246–253.Google Scholar
Hadar, J., and Russell, W. R.. “Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects.” Amer. Econ. Rev., 59(1969)55–34.Google Scholar
Hess, J. “Risk and the Gain from Information.” J. Econ. Theory, 27(1982):231–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G. M., Pearson, R. E., Clasgaugh, G. A., and Heald, C. W.. “Relationships Between Somatic Cell Counts and Milk Production.” J. Dairy Sci., 67(1984):1823–1831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marschak, J. “Economics of Information Systems.” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 66(1971):1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marschak, J., and Radner, R.. Economic Theory of Games. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. “Choice Among Distributions.” J. Econ. Theory, 14(1975):326–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natzke, R. P. “Elements of Mastitis Control.” J. Dairy Sci., 64(1981):1431–1442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philpot, W. N. Mastitis Management. Oak Brook, IL: Babson Brothers Co., 1984.Google Scholar
Pratt, J. W. “Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large.” Econometrica, 32(1964):122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. W. “STODOM: Fortran Software Package.” Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, 1981.Google Scholar
Salop, S. “Information and Monopolistic Competition.” Amer. Econ. Rev., 66(1976):81–101.Google Scholar
Shanon, C. E., and Weaver, W., The Mathematical Theory of Communications. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. “The Economics of Information.” J. Pol. Econ., 69(1961):213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P. D. “Milking Machines—The Past Twenty-five Years.” J. Dairy Sci., 64(1981):1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar