Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:14:37.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Law of One Price: Developed and Developing Country Market Integration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Jian Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Accounting, Finance and Information Systems, Prairie View A&M University
David A. Bessler
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
David J. Leatham
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University

Abstract

The Law of One Price (LOP) is important to models of international trade and exchange rate determination. This study investigates a variant of the LOP applied to developed and developing countries. The competing hypotheses are (1) that one price prevails in both developed and developing countries and (2) that one price prevails in developed countries and another single price in developing countries. Using data from an internationally competitive commodity (soybean meal), we found evidence favors the first hypothesis, although two large developing countries under study are active participants in regional trade integration, which may bias them against the first hypothesis.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ardeni, P.G.Does the Law of One Price Really Hold for Commodity Prices?American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71(1989):661669.Google Scholar
Baffe, J.Some Further Evidence on The Law of One Price: The Law of One Price Still Holds.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(1991):126473.Google Scholar
Bessler, D.A. and Peterson, E.W.F.. “Cotton Prices in the U.S. and Northern Europe: Government Policies Affect Cointegration.” Working Paper, 1996.Google Scholar
Bessler, D.A. and Akleman, D.G. “Farm Prices, Retail Prices and Directed Graphs: Results For Pork and Beef.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(1998):11441149.Google Scholar
Cristini, A.Economic Activity and Commodity Prices: Theory and Evidence,” in: Vines, D. and Currie, D., Ed., North-South Linkages and International Macroeconomic Policy, Cambridge University Press, 4970, 1995.Google Scholar
Diakosawas, D.How Integrated Are World Beef Markets? The Case of Australian and U.S. Beef Markets.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 12(1995):3753.Google Scholar
Dickey, D.A. and Fuller, W.A.. “The Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series With A Unit Root.” Econometrica 49(1981):10571072.Google Scholar
Doan, T.RATS: User's Manual, Version 4.0. Evanston, Illinois. 1992.Google Scholar
Ghosh, S.R.Reverse Linkages: The Growing Importance of Developing Countries.” Finance and Development 33(1996):3841.Google Scholar
Goodwin, B.K.Multivariate Cointegration Tests and The Law of One Price in International Wheat Markets.” Review of Agricultural Economics 14(1992):117–24.Google Scholar
Hansen, H. and Juselius, K.. The Manual For CATS In RATS. Estima, Illinois. 1995.Google Scholar
Hollifield, B. and Uppal, R.. “An Examination of Uncovered Interest Rate Parity in Segmented International Commodity Markets.” Journal of Finance 52(1997):21452170.Google Scholar
Johansen, S. and Juselius, K.. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration-With Application to the Demand for Money.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52(1990):169210.Google Scholar
Johansen, S. and Juselius, K.. “Identification of the Long-Run and the Short-Run Structure: An Application To The ISLM Model.” Journal of Econometrics 63(1994):736.Google Scholar
Johansen, S.Determination of Cointegration Rank In The Presence of A Linear Trend.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 54(1992):383397.Google Scholar
Michael, P., Nobay, R.A., and Peel, D.. “Purchasing Power Parity Yet Again: Evidence From Spatially Separated Commodity Markets.” Journal of International Money and Finance 13(1994):637657.Google Scholar
Mohanty, S., Peterson, E.W.E, and Smith, D.B.. “Price Relationships Between U.S. and Canadian Wheat Prices: Cointegration and Error Correction Approach.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 44(1996):265277.Google Scholar
Mohanty, S., Peterson, E.W.F., and Smith, D.B.. “Fractional Cointegration and The False Rejection of the Law of One Price in International Commodity Markets.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 30(1998):267276.Google Scholar
Mohanty, S., Meyers, W.H., and Smith, D.B.. “A Reexamination of Price Dynamics in the International Wheat Market.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 47(1999):2129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monke, E.A. and Taylor, L.D.. “International Trade Constraints and Commodity Market Models: An Application To The Cotton Market.” Review of Economics and Statistics 67(1985):98107.Google Scholar
Orden, D. and Fisher, L.A.. “Financial Deregulation and Dynamics of Money, Prices and Output In New Zealand and Australia.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 25(1993):273292.Google Scholar
Pantula, S.G., Gonzalez-Farias, G., and Fuller, W.A.. “A Comparison of Unit-Root Test Criteria.” Journal Of Business And Economic Statistics 12(1994):449459.Google Scholar
Pearl, J.Causal Diagrams for Empirical Research.” Biometrika 82(1995):669710.Google Scholar
Phillips, P.Impulse Response and Forecast Error Variance Asymptotics in Nonstationary Vars.” Journal of Econometrics 83(1998):2156.Google Scholar
Phillips, P. and Perron, P.. 1988. “Testing For A Unit Root In Time Series Regression.” Biometrica 75(1988):335–46.Google Scholar
Protopapadakis, A. and Stoll, H.R.. “Spot and Futures Prices and The Law of One Price.” Journal of Finance 38(1983):14311455.Google Scholar
Protopapadakis, A. and Stoll, H.R.. “The Law of One Price in International Commodity Markets: A Reformulation and Some Formal Tests.” Journal of International Money and Finance 5(1986):335360.Google Scholar
Ravallion, M.Testing Market Integration.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(1986):102109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schemes, R., Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., and Meek, C.. TETRAD II: User's Manual and Software, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 1994.Google Scholar
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., and Schemes, R.. Causation, Prediction, and Search, New York: Springer-Verlag. 1993.Google Scholar
Stigler, G.J. and Sherwin, R.A.. The Extent of The Market, Journal of Law and Economics 27(1985):555585.Google Scholar
Swanson, N.R. and Granger, C.W.J.. “Impulse Response Functions Based on A Causal Approach to Residual Orthogonalization In Vector Auto-regressions.” Journal of The American Statistical Association 92(1997):357367.Google Scholar
Taylor, E.L., Bessler, D.A., Waller, M.L., and Rister, M.E.. “Dynamic Relationships Between US and Thai Rice Prices.” Agricultural Economics 14(1996):123133.Google Scholar
Whittaker, J.Graphical Models in Applied Multivariate Statistics, Chichester: John Wiley. 1990.Google Scholar
Yang, J. and Leatham, D.J.. “Price Discovery in Wheat Futures Markets.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 31(1999):359370.Google Scholar
Zanias, G.RTesting For Integration In European Commodity Agricultural Product Markets.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 44(1993):418–27.Google Scholar