Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:26:39.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurement and Explanation of Technical Efficiency Performance in Ukrainian Agriculture, 1991–1996

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Olga I. Murova ,
Michael A. Trueblood  and
Keith H. Coble
Olga I. Murova
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
Michael A. Trueblood
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C
Keith H. Coble
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study examines technical efficiency patterns in Ukraine's crop sector for 1991-1996. The economic and policy environment in Ukraine has changed since reform began in 1991. Many policy changes have exerted offsetting economic pressures on efficiency. Enterprise privatization and the liberalization of prices and trade put upward pressure on technical efficiency, whereas start-stop land privatization efforts, unpredictable government intervention, and slow developments in the credit and labor markets put downward pressure on efficiency. We found that technical efficiency appears to have improved slightly over the 1991-1996 period, suggesting that the positive forces had more impact.

Keywords

Data envelopment analysisenterprise privatizationinefficiencyprice liberalizationproductivitystochastic frontier analysistechnical efficiencyD29E23E66O38P32
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , April 2004 , pp. 185 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aigner, D., Loveli, C.A.K., and Schmidt, P.. “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models.” Journal of Econometrics 6(July 1977):21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battese, G.E., and Coelli, T.J.. “A Model for Technical Efficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data.” Empirical Economics 20(April 1995):325–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battese, G.E., and Corra, G.S.. “Estimation of a Production Frontier Model: With Application to the Pastoral Zone of Eastern Australia.” Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 21 (December 1977):169–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjornlund, B. “Ukraine—Issues and Analysis.” Internet site: http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/ukraine/issues.htm (Accessed March 15, 2000).Google Scholar
Bouzaher, A., Carriquiry, A., and Jensen, H.. “The Structure of Ukrainian Agriculture: Comparative Efficiency with International Agriculture and Implications for Policy Reform.” CARD Staff Report 94-SR72, Iowa State University, 1994.Google Scholar
Bravo-Ureta, B.E., and Rieger, L.. “Alternative Production Frontier Methodologies and Dairy Farm Efficiency.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 41(May 1990):215–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chames, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E.. “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research 2(November 1978):429–44.Google Scholar
Coelli, T.J. A Guide to FRONTIER Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Frontier Production Function Estimation, CEPA Working Paper 96/07, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia, 1996.Google Scholar
Csaki, C, and Lerman, Z.. “Land Reform in Ukraine: The First Five Years.” Discussion Paper No. 371. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., and Loveli, C.A.K.. Production Frontiers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Farrell, M.J. “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Gen. 125(1957):253–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrier, G.D., and Loveli, C.A.K.. “Measuring Cost Efficiency in Banking: Econometric and Linear Programming Evidence.” Journal of Econometrics 46(October/November 1990):229–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Econometric Frontier Functions.” Journal of Econometrics 13(May 1980):27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjalmarsson, L., Kumbhakar, S.C., and Heshmati, A.. “DEA, DEA, and SFA: A Comparison.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 7(July 1996):303–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute of Agrarian Economy. “Ukrainian Agrobusiness Complex: Situation and Perspectives for 1990-2000.” Institute of Agrarian Economy, Kiev, January 1999. [In Ukrainian]Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF). Direction of Trade Statistics. Washington, DC: IMF, 2000a.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF). International Financial Statistics Yearbook, Washington, DC: IMF, 2000b.Google Scholar
Jensen, H., Lakshminarayan, RG., Bouzaher, A., Carriquiry, A., Johnson, S.R., and Sabluk, P.. “A Stochastic Frontier Analysis of Technical Efficiency of Ukrainian Crop and Livestock Enterprises and Implications for Reform.” Ukrainian Economic Review 2(1996):4–22.Google Scholar
Johnson, S.R., Bouzaher, A., Carriquiry, A., Jensen, H., and Lakshminarayan, P.G.. “Production Efficiency and Agricultural Reform in Ukraine.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(1994):629–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovaleva, E. “Regional Politics in Ukraine's Transition: Donetsk Elites.” Sunderland University, United Kingdom, Internet site: http://www.sunderland.ac.uk/~osOhva/kova.htm (Accessed February 14, 2003).Google Scholar
Macours, K., and Swinnen, J.EM.. “Causes of Output Decline in Economic Transition: The Case of Central and Eastern European Agriculture.” Journal of Comparative Economics 28(2000):172–06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeusen, W, and van den Broeck, J.. “Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error.” International Economic Review 18(June 1977):435–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, D.L., Garcia, E., and Nelson, C.H.. “Technical Efficiency: A Comparison of Production Frontier Methods.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 44, 3(September 1993):479–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL). Newsline Vol. 5, No. 208, Part II. Prague, Czech Republic: RFE/RL, 1 November 2001.Google Scholar
Sedik, D., Trueblood, M.A., and Arnade, C.. “Corporate Farm Performance in Russia, 1991-1995: An Efficiency Analysis.” Journal of Comparative Economics 27,3(1999):514–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, R. “Likelihood Functions for Generalized Stochastic Frontier Estimation.” Journal of Econometrics 13,1(May 1980):57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, W., and Wan, G.H.. “Technical Efficiency and Its Determinants in China's Grain Production.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 13,2(2000):159–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Ukraine internet briefing room, http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Ukraine/policy.htm (Accessed April 28, 2000).Google Scholar
World Bank. Ukraine: Economic Growth With Equity—A Participatory Country Economic Memorandum. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2000.Google Scholar