Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:23:09.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring Use Value from Recreation Participation: Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Donald B. K. English
Affiliation:
Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, USDA-Forest Service, 320 Green St., Athens, GA 30602
J. M. Bowker
Affiliation:
Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, USDA-Forest Service, 320 Green St., Athens, GA 30602

Extract

In a recent article in this Journal, Whitehead (1992) presents a method for estimating annual economic surplus for recreation trips to a natural resource site based on whether an individual participates in recreation at that site. Whitehead proposes his method as an alternative to the traditional two-stage travel cost approach. We contend that Whitehead's method contains two serious problems. The first is theoretical, and results in an overstatement of the value of recreation trips. The second is empirical, and pertains to the likely misspecification of his model in failing to incorporate what we feel is important sample information. We address these issues in order.

Type
Comments and Replies
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boadway, R.W., and Bruce, N.. Welfare Economics. New York: Blackwell. 1984. 344p.Google Scholar
Just, R.E., Hueth, D.L., and Schmitz, A.. Applied Welfare Economics and Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1982. 491p.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T.. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. 1989. 463p.Google Scholar
Whitehead, John C.Measuring Use Value from Recreation Participation.S. J. Agr. Econ., (1992): 113119.Google Scholar