Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:51:47.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Nonparametric Analysis of Efficiency for a Sample of Kansas Beef Cow Farms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Allen M. Featherstone ,
Michael R. Langemeier  and
Mohammad Ismet
Allen M. Featherstone
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University
Michael R. Langemeier
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University
Mohammad Ismet
Affiliation:
Indonesian Food Logistics Agency
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Competitive pressures in the cow-calf sector increased in 1995 because of a decline of 27% in calf prices. Technical, allocative, and scale efficiency measures were used to examine the competitiveness of a sample of Kansas beef cow farms. On average, the farms were 78% technically efficient, 81% allocatively efficient, and 95% scale efficient. Enterprise profitability was correlated positively with the efficiency measures. Inefficiency was related to herd size and degree of specialization. Producers should focus on using capital, feed, and labor more efficiently rather than increasing their size. Increased concentration of the cow-calf sector will not result in large cost savings given the current technology.

Keywords

beef cowindustry structurenonparametric efficiency
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , July 1997 , pp. 175 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauer, P.W. “Recent Developments in the Econometric Estimation of Frontiers.” J. Econometrics 46(October/November 1990):287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavas, J.P., and Aliber, M.. “An Analysis of Economic Efficiency in Agriculture: A Nonparametric Approach.” J. Agr. and Resour. Econ. 18,1(1993):1–16.Google Scholar
Cloutier, L.M., and Rowley, R.. “Relative Technical Efficiency: Data Envelopment Analysis and Quebec's Dairy Farms.” Can. J. Agr. Econ. 41(1993):169-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drabenstott, M. “Industrialization: Steady Current or Tidal Wave?” Choices (4th Quarter 1994):4–8.Google Scholar
Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., and Lovell, C.A.K.. The Measurement of Efficiency of Production. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fare, R., and Lovell, C.A.K.. “Measuring die Technical Efficiency of Production.” J. Econ. Theory 19(1978):150-62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Featherstone, A.M., Moghnieh, G.A., and Goodwin, B.K.. “Farm-Level Nonparametric Analysis of Cost-Minimization and Profit-Maximization Behavior.” Agr. Econ. 13(1995):109-17.Google Scholar
Feuz, D.M., and Ward, C.E.. “Industrialization of the Beef Subsector.” Invited paper presented at the annual meetings of the WAEA, Rapid City SD, 9–12 July 1995.Google Scholar
Garcia, P., Sonka, S., and Yoo, M.. “Farm Size, Tenure, and Economic Efficiency in a Sample of Illinois Grain Farms.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 64(1982):119-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, B.F., and Leveen, E.P.. “Farm Size and Economic Efficiency: The Case of California.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 60(1978):589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallam, A. “Economies of Size and Scale in Agriculture: An Interpretive Review of Empirical Measurement.” Rev. Agr. Econ. 13(1991):155-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D.G., Conner, J.M., Josling, T., Schmitz, A., and Schuh, G.E.. “Competitive Issues in the Beef Sector: Can Beef Compete in the 1990s?” Humphrey Institute Rep. No. 1, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1989.Google Scholar
Langemeier, M.R., McGrann, J.M., and Parker, J.. “Economies of Size in Cow-Calf Production.” Agri-Practice 16(May 1995):15–19.Google Scholar
Matulich, S.C. “Efficiencies in Large-Scale Dairying: Incentives for Further Structural Change.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 60(1978):642-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J.F., and Moffitt, R.A.. “The Uses of Tobit Analysis.” Rev. Econ. and Statis. 62(1982):318-21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, V.J. “The Industrialization of Hog Production.” Rev. Agr. Econ. 17(1995):107-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexton, R.J., Wilson, B.M., and Wann, J.J.. “Some Tests of the Economic Theory of Cooperatives: Metiiodology and Application to Cotton Ginning.” West. J. Agr. Econ. 14,l(1989):56–66.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1992 Census of Agriculture, Vol. 1, Part 16, Kansas State and County Data. Washington DC: U.S.Government Printing Office, April 1994.Google Scholar